Matchboard
AI tennis predictions: professional match breakdown
The page gathers the upcoming matches of the selected sport, model probabilities, odds, results and AI breakdowns in a single match center.
Live win probability (market-implied) — how often it wins, not a profit forecast.
Cocciaretto E
Siniakova K
Mensik J
Mochizuki S
Shelton B
Griekspoor T
Auger-Aliassime F
Hijikata R
Dimitrov G
Popyrin A
Borges N
Tien L
Halys Q
Diaz Acosta F
Ustic M
Psonka J
Hidalgo J S
Hedgecoe D
Swiatek I
Wang Xiyu
Shang Juncheng
Trungelliti M
Damm M
Tiafo F. (Ssha)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 25.3% / 74.7%
Market 1 / 2: 24.8% / 75.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 4 · total 0
Tournament: ATP - Singles: Open Championship USA (USA), Hard
Damm M
Tiafoe F
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 24.5% / 75.5%
Market 1 / 2: 23.6% / 76.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: International US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge
Osaka N
Zakharova A
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 85.9% / 14.1%
Market 1 / 2: 86.9% / 13.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: WTA - Singles: Open Championship USA (USA), Hard
Takahata R
Koizumi N
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 36.3% / 63.7%
Market 1 / 2: 36.0% / 64.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Mitsui S
Nakagawa S
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 81.2% / 18.8%
Market 1 / 2: 81.9% / 18.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Saitoh K
Okabe S. (Iapo)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 90.5% / 9.5%
Market 1 / 2: 91.5% / 8.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Tanuma R
Kavakhasi Iu. (Iapo)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 58.4% / 41.6%
Market 1 / 2: 54.4% / 45.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Oki Y
Imai S
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 30.2% / 69.8%
Market 1 / 2: 29.9% / 70.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Ichikawa T
Roddick J
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 43.1% / 56.9%
Market 1 / 2: 42.6% / 57.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Ochi M
Tanaka Y
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 62.0% / 38.0%
Market 1 / 2: 62.0% / 38.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Wang JiaYi
Bai Ch. (Kit)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 24.9% / 75.1%
Market 1 / 2: 23.7% / 76.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Kulikova A
Yao Xinxin
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 50.2% / 49.8%
Market 1 / 2: 50.0% / 50.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Naito Y
Astakhova D
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 35.2% / 64.8%
Market 1 / 2: 34.7% / 65.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Yamaguchi Mei
Back Dayeon
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 36.6% / 63.4%
Market 1 / 2: 36.4% / 63.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Huang Yujia (Kit)
Ma YeXin
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 38.4% / 61.6%
Market 1 / 2: 38.2% / 61.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Wang J. (Kit)
Ian I. (Kit)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 85.3% / 14.7%
Market 1 / 2: 86.3% / 13.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Kuramochi M. (Iapo)
Inoue H
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 47.4% / 52.6%
Market 1 / 2: 47.4% / 52.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Okamura K
Sidorova K
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 36.4% / 63.6%
Market 1 / 2: 36.3% / 63.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Hsu Yu Hsiou
Ymer E
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 62.5% / 37.5%
Market 1 / 2: 59.7% / 40.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: International Chzhantszyagan
Castelnuovo L
Dellavedova M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 37.2% / 62.8%
Market 1 / 2: 37.1% / 62.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Singles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Simakin I
Yevseyev D
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 74.7% / 25.3%
Market 1 / 2: 75.3% / 24.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 4 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Singles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Tomic B
Imamura M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 64.2% / 35.8%
Market 1 / 2: 64.3% / 35.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Singles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Barki N. A. (Inz)
Perez Ramos P
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 24.2% / 75.8%
Market 1 / 2: 23.7% / 76.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Visaya A
Singh D P
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 34.1% / 65.9%
Market 1 / 2: 33.9% / 66.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Chan E. (Ssha)
Borg L
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 36.4% / 63.6%
Market 1 / 2: 35.6% / 64.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Patton T
Rathi A
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 43.9% / 56.1%
Market 1 / 2: 43.2% / 56.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Ryan Ziegann S
Ahren Moonga E. (Shve)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 74.1% / 25.9%
Market 1 / 2: 74.6% / 25.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Chanta T. (Tai)
Masabayashi T. (Iapo)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 74.4% / 25.6%
Market 1 / 2: 74.9% / 25.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
O'Connell B. (Avs)
Suresh K
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 84.0% / 16.0%
Market 1 / 2: 84.8% / 15.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Analytics
Why are PropickAI tennis predictions effective?
Tennis is a sport of individual matchups, so the model considers more than just player ranking. It factors in court surface, form in recent tournaments, head-to-head records, serve and return quality, draw density and possible fatigue. AI tennis predictions help you see where ATP and WTA statistics match the market line and where there is a discrepancy.