Matchboard
AI hockey predictions: analytical breakdown of KHL and NHL matches
The page gathers the upcoming matches of the selected sport, model probabilities, odds, results and AI breakdowns in a single match center.
Live win probability (market-implied) — how often it wins, not a profit forecast.
Halifax Mooseheads
Charlottetown
Krasnoyarskie Rysi
Kuznetskie Medvedi
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 50.9% / - / 49.1%
Market 1/X/2: 20.5% / 21.0% / 58.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-0-3 · goals 13:18
Away (form): W-D-L 1-0-3 · goals 6:14
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Belye Medvedi
Stalnye Lisy
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 48.1% / - / 51.9%
Market 1/X/2: 35.5% / 20.5% / 44.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 0-0-2 · goals 2:4
Away (form): W-D-L 3-1-1 · goals 17:11
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Krasnaya Armiya
Red Machine Atlant
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 47.5% / - / 52.5%
Market 1/X/2: 57.9% / 18.9% / 23.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 1-0-2 · goals 8:10
Away (form): W-D-L 3-0-0 · goals 11:8
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Omskie Krylia
Toros
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 49.1% / - / 50.9%
Market 1/X/2: 45.0% / 22.0% / 33.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 4-1-0 · goals 21:9
Away (form): W-D-L 5-0-0 · goals 16:5
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
SKA-VMF
Admiral
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 47.7% / - / 52.3%
Market 1/X/2: 21.6% / 20.2% / 58.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 42%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-1-1 · goals 7:6
Away (form): W-D-L 3-0-2 · goals 18:14
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Sibirskie Snaipery
Omskiye Yastreby
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 50.9% / - / 49.1%
Market 1/X/2: 29.8% / 21.5% / 48.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 42%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 4-0-1 · goals 24:11
Away (form): W-D-L 4-1-0 · goals 13:5
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Ak Bars
Dinamo Minsk
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 46.0% / - / 54.0%
Market 1/X/2: 35.9% / 22.6% / 41.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 68%
Context and risks
Arena:Megasport (Moscow, Russia), capacity: 12396
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 1-0-4 · goals 10:15
Away (form): W-D-L 4-0-1 · goals 23:18
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Lada
Salavat Yulayev
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 53.2% / - / 46.8%
Market 1/X/2: 25.7% / 21.6% / 52.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 47%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-0-2 · goals 7:10
Away (form): W-D-L 2-0-2 · goals 9:10
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
VERVA Litvinov
Karlovy Vary
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 49.3% / - / 50.7%
Market 1/X/2: 39.4% / 22.0% / 38.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 3-0-1 · goals 10:7
Away (form): W-D-L 1-0-0 · goals 6:3
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Dukla Michalovce
Kosice
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 49.1% / - / 50.9%
Market 1/X/2: 39.1% / 21.9% / 39.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 1-0-1 · goals 6:8
Away (form): W-D-L 2-0-1 · goals 10:5
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Vitkovice Ridera
Olomouc
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 48.4% / - / 51.6%
Market 1/X/2: 51.5% / 22.1% / 26.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 42%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 0-0-3 · goals 0:8
Away (form): W-D-L 1-0-2 · goals 5:6
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Tappara
Karpat
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 50.7% / - / 49.3%
Market 1/X/2: 56.4% / 19.8% / 23.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 0-2-3 · goals 6:11
Away (form): W-D-L 1-0-3 · goals 6:11
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Brynas
Djurgardens
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 51.9% / - / 48.1%
Market 1/X/2: 49.2% / 21.0% / 29.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 1-0-0 · goals 3:1
Away (form): W-D-L 0-0-2 · goals 3:5
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
SKA St. Petersburg
Barys
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 51.3% / - / 48.7%
Market 1/X/2: 65.6% / 18.3% / 16.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 42%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-0-0 · goals 5:2
Away (form): W-D-L 1-0-2 · goals 4:8
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Frolunda
Malmo
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 49.0% / 19.5% / 31.6%
Market 1/X/2: 48.7% / 21.2% / 30.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 22%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 2 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 3-0-0 · goals 8:3
Away (form): W-D-L 0-0-2 · goals 2:4
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
HV71
Rogle
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 49.4% / - / 50.6%
Market 1/X/2: 29.9% / 22.6% / 47.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-0-1 · goals 7:6
Away (form): W-D-L 1-0-0 · goals 3:2
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Dinamo SPb
Gornyak-UGMK
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 51.0% / - / 49.0%
Market 1/X/2: 40.4% / 23.2% / 36.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: TNA Cup. Kazan
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 0-1-2 · goals 3:6
Away (form): W-D-L 0-1-4 · goals 7:17
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Bars
Neftyanik Almetyevsk
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 47.7% / - / 52.3%
Market 1/X/2: 36.9% / 22.2% / 41.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Club Friendly Games
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-0-2 · goals 6:10
Away (form): W-D-L 1-2-2 · goals 10:11
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Yuzhny Ural Orsk
Kristall Saratov
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 48.1% / - / 51.9%
Market 1/X/2: 41.3% / 21.6% / 37.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Club Friendly Games
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-1-1 · goals 12:7
Away (form): W-D-L 3-1-1 · goals 17:11
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Sokol Krasnoyarsk
HC Norilsk
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 46.6% / - / 53.4%
Market 1/X/2: 46.4% / 21.1% / 32.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Club Friendly Games
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 1-2-2 · goals 12:12
Away (form): W-D-L 2-2-1 · goals 14:13
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Avangard
Severstal
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 51.7% / - / 48.3%
Market 1/X/2: 57.7% / 21.6% / 20.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 63%
Context and risks
Arena:Dzhi-Drayv-Arena (Omsk, Russia), capacity: 12011
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Club Friendly Games
Form and absences
Home (form): no data
Away (form): W-D-L 0-0-4 · goals 9:15
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Dizel
CSK VVS Samara
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 47.4% / - / 52.6%
Market 1/X/2: 51.4% / 21.3% / 27.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Club Friendly Games
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 0-3-2 · goals 11:17
Away (form): W-D-L 1-1-3 · goals 11:13
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Krasnaya Mashina Yunior
Amurskie Tigry
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 51.1% / - / 48.9%
Market 1/X/2: 26.4% / 19.3% / 54.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Khokkey. Russia. Friendlies Matchi
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 1-1-0 · goals 4:3
Away (form): W-D-L 2-0-3 · goals 12:14
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Assat
Vaasan Sport
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 52.3% / - / 47.7%
Market 1/X/2: 51.4% / 20.6% / 28.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Finland. Friendly
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-0-1 · goals 11:6
Away (form): W-D-L 1-0-2 · goals 4:5
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
SaiPa
Jukurit
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 48.5% / - / 51.5%
Market 1/X/2: 51.9% / 20.5% / 27.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Finland. Friendly
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 1-0-1 · goals 4:9
Away (form): W-D-L 3-1-1 · goals 10:5
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
KooKoo
HIFK
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 50.6% / - / 49.4%
Market 1/X/2: 45.2% / 20.6% / 34.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Finland. Friendly
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 1-0-2 · goals 5:10
Away (form): W-D-L 0-0-2 · goals 3:5
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
HPK
Lukko
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 53.6% / - / 46.4%
Market 1/X/2: 39.5% / 21.1% / 39.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Finland. Friendly
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 2-0-1 · goals 7:5
Away (form): W-D-L 0-0-3 · goals 8:19
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Horacka Slavia Trebic
Zubr Prerov
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 54.9% / - / 45.1%
Market 1/X/2: 54.4% / 20.6% / 25.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 42%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Czech Republic. Friendly
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 4-0-1 · goals 19:8
Away (form): W-D-L 0-1-3 · goals 5:12
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Dukla Jihlava
Dynamo Pardubice B
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 52.2% / - / 47.8%
Market 1/X/2: 65.6% / 17.0% / 17.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 42%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Czech Republic. Friendly
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 4-0-1 · goals 14:9
Away (form): W-D-L 0-0-2 · goals 4:9
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Södertälje SK
Linkoping
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1/X/2: 48.5% / - / 51.5%
Market 1/X/2: 19.2% / 19.2% / 61.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 37%
Context and risks
Bookmaker coverage: 1X2 1 · pucks total 0
Tournament: International Sweden. Friendly
Form and absences
Home (form): W-D-L 0-0-1 · goals 0:3
Away (form): W-D-L 1-0-2 · goals 7:6
Absences: 0 / 0
Lineup confidence: -
Analytics
How does PropickAI predict hockey match results?
Hockey predictions need a dedicated model: goalie form, schedule density, power play and penalty kill, shot activity, roster fatigue and team motivation all matter. PropickAI uses AI and statistics to estimate outcome probabilities, totals and match scenarios. This approach helps you tell a strong signal from random odds movement faster.