Matchboard
AI tennis predictions: professional match breakdown
The page gathers the upcoming matches of the selected sport, model probabilities, odds, results and AI breakdowns in a single match center.
Live win probability (market-implied) — how often it wins, not a profit forecast.
Lehecka J
Samuel T
Vacherot V
Majchrzak K
Bublik A
Mannarino A
Duckworth J
Wu Yibing
Berrettini M
Navone M
Sakamoto R
Tiafoe F
Wang Xinyu
Kalinskaya A
Harris L
Tsitsipas S
Cruz A / Kawano Cho G
Dourado J R / Sanchez Uribe M J
Li A
Vekic D
Faria J
Alkaras K. (Isp)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 12.3% / 87.7%
Market 1 / 2: 11.2% / 88.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 4 · total 0
Tournament: International US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge
Svitolina E
Joint M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 85.0% / 15.0%
Market 1 / 2: 85.7% / 14.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: International US Open. Women
Tararudee L
Noskova L
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 21.8% / 78.2%
Market 1 / 2: 21.1% / 79.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: WTA - Singles: Open Championship USA (USA), Hard
Ichikawa T
Matsuda Ryuki
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 50.8% / 49.2%
Market 1 / 2: 51.1% / 48.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 29%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Tanuma R
Shiraishi H
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 31.4% / 68.6%
Market 1 / 2: 30.9% / 69.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Honda N
Nakagawa N
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 43.2% / 56.8%
Market 1 / 2: 43.1% / 56.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 29%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Saitoh K
Ferguson C
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 52.5% / 47.5%
Market 1 / 2: 52.6% / 47.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Mitsui S
Koizumi N
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 82.1% / 17.9%
Market 1 / 2: 83.0% / 17.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Fukuda S
Sekulic P
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 29.4% / 70.6%
Market 1 / 2: 28.4% / 71.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Erel Y
Oki Y
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 81.3% / 18.7%
Market 1 / 2: 81.9% / 18.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Urayasu (Japan), Hard
Jones Alex / Jones Miles
Choe J./Kim G. J.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 54.3% / 45.7%
Market 1 / 2: 64.4% / 35.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Liu Siu/Yang X.
Sinkler K./Vuiich S.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 38.6% / 61.4%
Market 1 / 2: 38.0% / 62.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Persell M./Van Tszen
Jin Yuquan / Sun Qian
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 34.3% / 65.7%
Market 1 / 2: 33.9% / 66.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Sun Z./Van Ian
Chen X./Trongcharoenchaikul V.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 20.1% / 79.9%
Market 1 / 2: 19.0% / 81.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Yamaguchi Mei
Bai Ch. (Kit)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 27.0% / 73.0%
Market 1 / 2: 26.5% / 73.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Garlend Dzh. (Tvn)
Kulikova A
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 66.5% / 33.5%
Market 1 / 2: 67.0% / 33.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Nugroho P. M. (Inz)
Morvayova V
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 64.5% / 35.5%
Market 1 / 2: 64.5% / 35.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Kaji H
Shi Han
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 27.9% / 72.1%
Market 1 / 2: 27.5% / 72.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Kim Geun Jun
Dzhons A. (Ssha)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 58.8% / 41.2%
Market 1 / 2: 73.4% / 26.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Yang Z. (Kit)
Trongcharoenchaikul W
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 20.1% / 79.9%
Market 1 / 2: 18.9% / 81.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Koyama H
Sun Qian
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 51.3% / 48.7%
Market 1 / 2: 51.4% / 48.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Simakin I
Dellavedova M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 67.2% / 32.8%
Market 1 / 2: 68.0% / 32.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Singles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Santillan A
Ivashka I
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 29.8% / 70.2%
Market 1 / 2: 29.4% / 70.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Singles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Becroft I
Chen Yan Cheng
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 78.8% / 21.2%
Market 1 / 2: 79.5% / 20.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Susanto A
Barki N. A. (Inz)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 23.2% / 76.8%
Market 1 / 2: 22.5% / 77.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Ha Minh Duc Vu
Borg L
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 8.2% / 91.8%
Market 1 / 2: 6.8% / 93.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 4 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Chanta T. (Tai)
O'Connell B. (Avs)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 68.4% / 31.6%
Market 1 / 2: 69.1% / 30.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Dong Chen
Sureshkumar M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 32.0% / 68.0%
Market 1 / 2: 31.4% / 68.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Suksumrarn T. (Tai)
Hashimoto H. (Ssha)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 48.1% / 51.9%
Market 1 / 2: 47.8% / 52.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Analytics
Why are PropickAI tennis predictions effective?
Tennis is a sport of individual matchups, so the model considers more than just player ranking. It factors in court surface, form in recent tournaments, head-to-head records, serve and return quality, draw density and possible fatigue. AI tennis predictions help you see where ATP and WTA statistics match the market line and where there is a discrepancy.