Matchboard
AI tennis predictions: professional match breakdown
The page gathers the upcoming matches of the selected sport, model probabilities, odds, results and AI breakdowns in a single match center.
Live win probability (market-implied) — how often it wins, not a profit forecast.
Dzhaisingkhani R
Chen Yan Cheng
Hasson J. (Izr)
Sharoenfon Iu. (Tai)
Shi Han
Saigo R
Kaji H
Ren Yufei
Morvayova V
Saito S
Trotter J
Hsu Yu Hsiou
Tseng C H
Watanuki Y
Odzeki M
Lee Eun Ji
Jang Su Jeong
Lin Fang An
Jeong Sunam
Yoshioka K
Storch S
Shearer M
Tian Fanzhan
Li Zongyu
Charlton Dzh./Van Aozhan
Kadkhe A / Iudzuki T
Sun F
Liu H. (Kit)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 81.1% / 18.9%
Market 1 / 2: 82.3% / 17.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Singles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Leong M W K
Matsuda, Koki
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 52.1% / 47.9%
Market 1 / 2: 52.1% / 47.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Singles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Sun F
Liu Khani
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 80.1% / 19.9%
Market 1 / 2: 81.1% / 18.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: International Chzhantszyagan
Kamput V
Weber A
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 9.7% / 90.3%
Market 1 / 2: 8.1% / 91.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Muto S. (Iapo)
Hashimoto H. (Ssha)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 29.7% / 70.3%
Market 1 / 2: 28.9% / 71.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Sato C. (Iapo)
Sumizava D. (Iapo)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 25.6% / 74.4%
Market 1 / 2: 24.4% / 75.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Srisen T. (Tai)
Mukund S. K. (Ind)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 9.4% / 90.6%
Market 1 / 2: 8.1% / 91.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Bax F
Suzuki K. (Iapo)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 86.2% / 13.8%
Market 1 / 2: 86.9% / 13.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Nonthaburi (Thailand), Hard
Aiukava M./Ye Q.
Fen Sh./Wang J.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 47.0% / 53.0%
Market 1 / 2: 46.9% / 53.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Doubles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Huang Yujia/Chzhen U.
Bak D./Kavaguti N.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 57.6% / 42.4%
Market 1 / 2: 57.8% / 42.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Doubles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Li Ia./Ian I.
Khosogi S./Naito I.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 61.9% / 38.1%
Market 1 / 2: 62.2% / 37.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Doubles: W75 Tianjin (China), Hard
Nam D./Pak U.
Khuan Ts./Imamura M.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 57.1% / 42.9%
Market 1 / 2: 57.3% / 42.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Doubles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Jiang F./Zhang T.
Iasika O./Tomich B.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 57.2% / 42.8%
Market 1 / 2: 45.2% / 54.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Doubles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Kong W./Meng F.
Dileini Dzh./Dileini Dzh.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 44.5% / 55.5%
Market 1 / 2: 10.3% / 89.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Doubles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Papa C./Zheng B.
Castelnuovo L / Santillan A
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 50.2% / 49.8%
Market 1 / 2: 50.0% / 50.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Doubles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Bar Biryukov P / Lomakin G
Hsu Y. H./Sun F.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 50.3% / 49.7%
Market 1 / 2: 50.0% / 50.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: Challenger Men - Doubles: Zhangjiagang (China), Hard
Chen X. D. (Kit)
Han X. (Kit)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 46.0% / 54.0%
Market 1 / 2: 45.9% / 54.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Vickery L. (Avs)
Koyama H
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 19.9% / 80.1%
Market 1 / 2: 18.9% / 81.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Vujic S
Talic Z. (Avs)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 90.6% / 9.4%
Market 1 / 2: 91.8% / 8.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Liu Siu (Kit)
Van Tszen (Kit)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 72.2% / 27.8%
Market 1 / 2: 72.8% / 27.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Wuning 7 (China), Hard
Susanto A
Chauhan H. (Ind)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 38.5% / 61.5%
Market 1 / 2: 38.2% / 61.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Bali 3 (Indonesia), Hard
Jiang Fumin / Zhang Tianhui
Jasika O / Tomic B
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 61.0% / 39.0%
Market 1 / 2: 45.7% / 54.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 33%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: International ATP Challenger. Zhangjiagang. Doubles
Papa C / Zheng Baoluo
Kastelnuovo L / Santilian A
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 56.3% / 43.7%
Market 1 / 2: 50.0% / 50.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 33%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: International ATP Challenger. Zhangjiagang. Doubles
Cirstea J. C. (Rum)
Stamatova J
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 61.9% / 38.1%
Market 1 / 2: 28.6% / 71.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W15 Brasov 2 (Romania), Clay
Marcu T. (Rum)
Dumitru K. E. G. (Rum)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 69.0% / 31.0%
Market 1 / 2: 69.6% / 30.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W15 Brasov 2 (Romania), Clay
Popa G. S. (Rum)
Kryvoruchko S
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 87.9% / 12.1%
Market 1 / 2: 89.0% / 11.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W15 Brasov 2 (Romania), Clay
Sandru I. M. (Rum)
Barbulescu B E
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 26.6% / 73.4%
Market 1 / 2: 25.6% / 74.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 29%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W15 Brasov 2 (Romania), Clay
Todoni C N
Sagmar I
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 78.5% / 21.5%
Market 1 / 2: 79.0% / 21.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W15 Brasov 2 (Romania), Clay
Cucu S./Sandru I. M.
Marinescu A./Sanduleasa I. I.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 62.3% / 37.7%
Market 1 / 2: 62.4% / 37.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Doubles: W15 Brasov 2 (Romania), Clay
Nica B./Srutwa M.
Prishakariu A./Safta A.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 12.3% / 87.7%
Market 1 / 2: 11.0% / 89.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Doubles: W15 Brasov 2 (Romania), Clay
Analytics
Why are PropickAI tennis predictions effective?
Tennis is a sport of individual matchups, so the model considers more than just player ranking. It factors in court surface, form in recent tournaments, head-to-head records, serve and return quality, draw density and possible fatigue. AI tennis predictions help you see where ATP and WTA statistics match the market line and where there is a discrepancy.