Matchboard
AI tennis predictions: professional match breakdown
The page gathers the upcoming matches of the selected sport, model probabilities, odds, results and AI breakdowns in a single match center.
Wu R. X. (Kit)
Uchijima M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 63.5% / 36.5%
Market 1 / 2: 65.1% / 34.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W15 Tianjin 3 (China), hard
Yoshimoto N
Park E. (Kor)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 59.3% / 40.7%
Market 1 / 2: - / -
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 6%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 0 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W15 Tianjin 3 (China), hard
Kim Dong Ju
Kang Ku K. (Kor)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 77.6% / 22.4%
Market 1 / 2: 79.2% / 20.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Maanshan 7 (China), hard
Chzhou Siao (Kit)
Alhogbani A. F. (Sau)
Kim Geun Jun
Fitriadi M R
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 32.5% / 67.5%
Market 1 / 2: 31.8% / 68.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Maanshan 7 (China), hard
Kong Weiyi
Trongcharoenchaikul W
Zanolini C
Bole S. (Fra)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 46.9% / 53.1%
Market 1 / 2: 53.5% / 46.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W35 Bistrita (Romania), clay
Amarlei I. (Rum)
Ewald W
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 64.4% / 35.6%
Market 1 / 2: 42.1% / 57.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W35 Bistrita (Romania), clay
Szabo B
Simionescu D-I
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 49.0% / 51.0%
Market 1 / 2: 50.0% / 50.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W35 Bistrita (Romania), clay
Popa M. S. (Rum)
Bojica S
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 49.6% / 50.4%
Market 1 / 2: - / -
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 12%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 0 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W35 Bistrita (Romania), clay
Todoni C N
Soriano Santiago M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 62.0% / 38.0%
Market 1 / 2: 55.0% / 45.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W35 Bistrita (Romania), clay
Cherie Ligniere E. (Ita)
Andreescu S A
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 28.5% / 71.5%
Market 1 / 2: 27.2% / 72.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 29%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Arad (Romania), clay
Enache S. (Rum)
Garbero F. F. (Ita)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 63.9% / 36.1%
Market 1 / 2: 9.6% / 90.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Arad (Romania), clay
Paolini A
Mazdrashki A
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 29.6% / 70.4%
Market 1 / 2: 26.8% / 73.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Arad (Romania), clay
Tenti F. (Arg)
Brown P
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 63.9% / 36.1%
Market 1 / 2: - / -
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 12%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 0 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Arad (Romania), clay
Lan X./Zeng Z.
Kim D./Kim N.
Derepasko T
Shcherbakov E. (Mir)
Krstic V
Lefevre R
Tiukaev R
Vukovic K
Klaassen S
Schlagenhauf N
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 54.6% / 45.4%
Market 1 / 2: 54.4% / 45.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Lambermont (Belgium), clay
Astakhova D
Nilsson L
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 57.6% / 42.4%
Market 1 / 2: 59.3% / 40.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Singles: W75 Kursumlijska Banja 3 (Serbia), clay
Petrovich D. (Ser)
Golubovic L H
Majchrzak A. (Pol)
Zeuch T
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 37.2% / 62.8%
Market 1 / 2: 35.1% / 64.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Krakow (Poland), clay
Suresh D. (Ind)
Valkush M. (Ven)
Michalski D
Keremedchiev N
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 88.5% / 11.5%
Market 1 / 2: 92.1% / 7.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Krakow (Poland), clay
Grevelius E./Heinonen A.
Mansilla Diez M / Winter Lopez B
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 60.9% / 39.1%
Market 1 / 2: 61.4% / 38.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Prague, Czech Republic Men Doubles
Donald M./Nikod Ia.
Latinovic S./Lof T.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 31.2% / 68.8%
Market 1 / 2: 28.9% / 71.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Prague, Czech Republic Men Doubles
Silva Tiago
Piatti R. (Mnk)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 49.9% / 50.1%
Market 1 / 2: 52.6% / 47.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Idanha-a-Nova 2 (Portugal), hard
Kolombo A. (Ita)
Bertrand R
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 58.8% / 41.2%
Market 1 / 2: 29.4% / 70.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Idanha-a-Nova 2 (Portugal), hard
Fernandes R
Quesada Perez T
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 45.4% / 54.6%
Market 1 / 2: 88.1% / 11.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Idanha-a-Nova 2 (Portugal), hard
Analytics
Why are PropickAI tennis predictions effective?
Tennis is a sport of individual matchups, so the model considers more than just player ranking. It factors in court surface, form in recent tournaments, head-to-head records, serve and return quality, draw density and possible fatigue. AI tennis predictions help you see where ATP and WTA statistics match the market line and where there is a discrepancy.