Matchboard
AI tennis predictions: professional match breakdown
The page gathers the upcoming matches of the selected sport, model probabilities, odds, results and AI breakdowns in a single match center.
Bonding O./Maxted L.
Khands T./Summers M.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 40.7% / 59.3%
Market 1 / 2: 40.7% / 59.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Roehampton, Great Britain Men Doubles
Khignett L./Walters M.
Bittun-Kuzmin K./Shimizu Iu.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 35.5% / 64.5%
Market 1 / 2: 33.6% / 66.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Roehampton, Great Britain Men Doubles
Gannon C./Makkinlei Dzh.
Barry C./Brum Ch.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 43.1% / 56.9%
Market 1 / 2: 42.1% / 57.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Roehampton, Great Britain Men Doubles
Nesterov P./Ovcharenko A,
Kompanuchchi T./Rikka Dzh.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 59.8% / 40.2%
Market 1 / 2: 61.4% / 38.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Sion, Switzerland Men Doubles
Bernet H./Striker D.
Kalyanpur A / Nedunchezhiyan J
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 64.5% / 35.5%
Market 1 / 2: 66.4% / 33.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Sion, Switzerland Men Doubles
Blankano Zh./Hermans M.
Estevez J./La Serna J. M.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 61.5% / 38.5%
Market 1 / 2: 62.5% / 37.5%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Sion, Switzerland Men Doubles
Sueoka Y / Tajima N
Merino A / Zhu Michael
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 56.8% / 43.2%
Market 1 / 2: 50.0% / 50.0%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: International ATP Challenger. Sion. Doubles
Nesterov P./Ovcharenko A,
Compagnucci T / Ricca G
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 46.2% / 53.8%
Market 1 / 2: 51.4% / 48.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 33%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: International ATP Challenger. Sion. Doubles
Bernet H / Stricker D
Kalyanpur A / Nedunchezhiyan J
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 52.1% / 47.9%
Market 1 / 2: 66.3% / 33.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 33%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: International ATP Challenger. Sion. Doubles
Kuczer D./Samir S.
Maduzzi G./Pace F.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 39.7% / 60.3%
Market 1 / 2: 37.6% / 62.4%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Doubles: W35 Krakow (Poland), clay
Berto L
Wygona J. (Pol)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 60.3% / 39.7%
Market 1 / 2: 62.3% / 37.7%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 4 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Krakow (Poland), clay
Ceban, Mark
Radulov I
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 48.1% / 51.9%
Market 1 / 2: 47.8% / 52.2%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger. Roehampton
Pucinelli de Almeida M
Tarvet, Oliver
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 29.1% / 70.9%
Market 1 / 2: 27.1% / 72.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: International ATP Challenger Roehampton, Great Britain Men Singles
Gombos N
Cuenin S
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 40.8% / 59.2%
Market 1 / 2: 40.7% / 59.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Prague, Czech Republic Men Singles
Barton G./Vrbenski M.
Dzevetski K./Valkov Sh.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 56.9% / 43.1%
Market 1 / 2: 57.4% / 42.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ATP Challenger Prague, Czech Republic Men Doubles
Cassani S./Uoker B.
Nad A./Simion O. G.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 18.0% / 82.0%
Market 1 / 2: 14.2% / 85.8%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 3 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Women - Doubles: W35 Bistrita (Romania), clay
Silva J D
Andaloro F
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 45.1% / 54.9%
Market 1 / 2: - / -
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 12%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 0 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Idanha-a-Nova 2 (Portugal), hard
Barroso Campos A
Bravo A. (Ssha)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 57.5% / 42.5%
Market 1 / 2: - / -
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 6%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 0 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Idanha-a-Nova 2 (Portugal), hard
Vetrih M. (Sln)
Pieri S
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 53.0% / 47.0%
Market 1 / 2: 8.4% / 91.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Slovenj Gradec (Slovenia), clay
Swiatek I
Parry D
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 89.9% / 10.1%
Market 1 / 2: 93.2% / 6.9%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 72%
Match context
Court:Lindner Femili Tennis Senter.
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 5 · total 0
Tournament: International WTA Cincinnati, USA Women Singles
Cirstea S
Pegula J
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 29.4% / 70.6%
Market 1 / 2: 27.7% / 72.3%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 24%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 4 · total 0
Tournament: WTA Cincinnati, USA Women Singles
Fischer F. (Avt)
Zielinski M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 11.7% / 88.3%
Market 1 / 2: 8.4% / 91.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M15 Mistelbach (Austria), clay
Harnoth M. L. (Ger)
Nagel A. (Fra)
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 55.9% / 44.1%
Market 1 / 2: 100.0% / -
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Singles: M25 Ueberlingen (Germany), clay
Wessels L
Shell N. (Ger)
Bonding O / Maxted L
Hands T / Summers M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 41.7% / 58.3%
Market 1 / 2: 41.4% / 58.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 33%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 2 · total 0
Tournament: International ATP Challenger. Roehampton. Doubles
Beraldo L./Comino L.
Parenti L./Rispoli N.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 48.4% / 51.6%
Market 1 / 2: 58.9% / 41.1%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 18%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 1 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Doubles: M25 Lesa (Italy), clay
Blanchar A / Garcia Mestre J
Lopes Montagud K./Lopes Morilo I.
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 44.2% / 55.8%
Market 1 / 2: - / -
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 6%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 0 · total 0
Tournament: ITF Men - Doubles: M25 Santander (Spain), clay
Galloway R / King E
Darderi L / Etcheverry T M
All stats and model conclusions
Model vs market
Glicko 1 / 2: 60.7% / 39.3%
Market 1 / 2: 62.4% / 37.6%
Favourite trap: no
Data completeness: 39%
Match context
Bookmaker coverage: 1×2 6 · total 0
Tournament: International ATP. Doubles. Cincinnati. Hard
Analytics
Why are PropickAI tennis predictions effective?
Tennis is a sport of individual matchups, so the model considers more than just player ranking. It factors in court surface, form in recent tournaments, head-to-head records, serve and return quality, draw density and possible fatigue. AI tennis predictions help you see where ATP and WTA statistics match the market line and where there is a discrepancy.