WNBA
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Indiana Fever (w) — 74%
Pure model vs market (2 · Indiana Fever (w)): model 65% · market 75% Δ −10 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Portland (w) 26.0%, win Indiana Fever (w) 74.0%. Model favourite — Indiana Fever (w).
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: Fonbet. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Full match breakdown: outcomes, market scenarios, form, lineups and key risks. During live you can get another, more accurate prediction accounting for the score, minute and tempo. Price: $1
Payment via YooKassa. After payment we will redirect you to a private link with the prediction.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Basketball math model. The basketball model is built around the expected spread: Glicko-2, home court, tempo, lineup and margin of victory. Totals and handicaps are shown separately when there is enough market data for them.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Best value: no value found
The basketball model is built around the expected spread: Glicko-2, home court, tempo, lineup and margin of victory. Totals and handicaps are shown separately when there is enough market data for them.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Betcity | Fonbet |
|---|---|---|
| — | 1.67 59.9% | |
| — | 1.51 66.2% | |
| — | 2.60 38.5% | |
| — | 2.37 42.2% | |
| — | 2.23 44.8% | |
| — | 2.07 48.3% | |
| — | 1.96 51.0% | |
| 1.90 52.6% | — | |
| — | 2.07 48.3% | |
| — | 2.37 42.2% | |
| — | 1.44 69.4% | |
| — | 1.51 66.2% | |
| — | 1.58 63.3% | |
| — | 1.67 59.9% | |
| — | 1.75 57.1% | |
| — | 1.90 52.6% | |
| — | 1.96 51.0% | |
| 1.90 52.6% | — |
| Outcome | Betcity | Fonbet |
|---|---|---|
| Over 175.5 | — | 1.50 66.7% |
| Over 176.5 | — | 1.56 64.1% |
| Over 177.5 | — | 1.50 66.7% |
| Over 178.5 | — | 1.50 66.7% |
| Over 179.5 | — | 1.56 64.1% |
| Over 180.5 | 1.87 53.5% | 1.62 61.7% |
| Over 181.5 | — | 1.70 58.8% |
| Over 182.5 | — | 1.75 57.1% |
| Over 183.5 | 1.93 51.8% | 1.87 53.5% |
| Over 184.5 | — | 1.88 53.2% |
| Over 185.5 | — | 1.96 51.0% |
| Over 186.5 | — | 2.07 48.3% |
| Over 187.5 | — | 2.15 46.5% |
| Over 188.5 | — | 2.30 43.5% |
| Under 180.5 | 1.93 51.8% | — |
| Under 183.5 | 1.87 53.5% | — |
| Outcome | Betcity | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.30 23.3% | 3.75 26.7% | 3.80 26.3% | |
| 1.22 82.0% | 1.27 78.7% | 1.29 77.5% |
Portland (w)
Indiana Fever (w)
Sietl (zh)
Sietl (zh)
Golden Steyt (zh)
Full head-to-head historyPortland (w) - Indiana Fever (w)
The Portland (w) - Indiana Fever (w) breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
