remo face Santos on August 5, 2026 in the Brazil: Kopa Betano.
Recent form (W-D-L): remo 0-1-0, Santos 0-1-0. These sides have met 1 time recently — the head-to-head record is shown below. The bookmaker line makes Santos the favourite at about 41%. Full analysis — form, H2H, odds and the PrognozAI AI prediction — follows on this page.
🎯 PropickAI prediction
Low confidence
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
2Santos — 41%
Pure model vs market (2 · Santos): model 33% · market 41%Δ −8 ppmodel estimates below the market
41%2
1 · remo29.3%
X · draw30.0%
2 · Santos40.7%
Model estimate: win remo 29.3%, draw 30.0%, win Santos 40.7%. Model favourite — Santos.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
🤖AI agent prediction
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
1remo (odds3.00)Score 1:0confidence 50%
•Model backs Remo: probability 50% vs 33% on the line (odds 3.00)
•edge over the line +17 pp — value pick
•Expected score 1:0.
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
*
Math-model prediction
AI match prediction remo - Santos August 5, 2026
Football math model
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Santos.
Line favourite market consensus: Santos. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
Odds source: consensus of 16 books (10Bet, 1xBet, Baltbet, Bet365, BetVictor, Betano). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
⚽
SStats data
Statistics and model
Copa Do Brasil
League table
remo
#127 ptsGP 32-1-05:2
Santos
#215 ptsGP 31-2-02:0
Best price
across 13 books
13.461xBet
X3.20Betfair
22.3210Bet
Highest odds across books (line-shopping) per SStats data — for reference, not advertising and not a betting recommendation.
Averages over the last 10 matches per SStats data — for reference.
Model form (Glicko)
remo
Rating 1771
Santos
Rating 1659
Glicko rating, expected goals (xG) and win probability per the SStats model — for reference, complements the AI review.
AI
Model consensus
AI outcome leader: 1
Main outcome
Agreement1/1
Confidence62.0%
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
🧮
Model prediction • nb-bet.com
Score prediction
remo1:1Santos
13.41
X3.08
22.30
Score prediction and odds (1X2): third-party model service nb-bet.com. For reference — not a PropickAI prediction. Source
*
AI overview
AI predictions
AI analysis:2/7 ready· Still preparing:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
Google AIupdated04.08.2026 01:42 UTC
126%
X34%
240%✓ favourite
Score0:0Total goals: Under 2.5BTTS:NoBet:Draw (X)
Per AI dataH2H: 0-1-0
Claudeupdated04.08.2026 01:45 UTC
128%
X32%
240%✓ favourite
Score0:1Total goals: Under 2.5BTTS:NoBet:Under 2.5
AI consensus:2
AI
1
X
2
Score
Total goals
BTTS
Bet
Google AI
26%
34%
40%
0:0
Under 2.5
No
Draw (X)
Claude
28%
32%
40%
0:1
Under 2.5
No
Under 2.5
Buy the full AI analysis
Full match breakdown: outcomes, market scenarios, form, lineups and key risks. During live you can get another, more accurate prediction accounting for the score, minute and tempo. Price: $1
Payment via YooKassa. After payment we will redirect you to a private link with the prediction.
Football math model.
The football model compares the market, Glicko-2, Poisson/xG, home advantage and tempo. The draw is accounted for as match risk but is not presented as a separate signal. Green value on an outcome means a mathematical edge, not a prediction guarantee.
OutcomeLineGlickoSignal
remo28.4%29.3%
Draw30.4%30.0%draw risk
Santos41.2%40.7%market and model agree
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Football math model
P1 / X / P229.3% / 30.0% / 40.7%
outcome probabilities; the draw is not highlighted as value
Rating1,415 / 1,411
Remo / Santos Ica
RD199 / 178
rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD1,018-1,813 / 1,054-1,768
strength interval
The football model compares the market, Glicko-2, Poisson/xG, home advantage and tempo. The draw is accounted for as match risk but is not presented as a separate signal. Green value on an outcome means a mathematical edge, not a prediction guarantee.
Betting snapshot
1X2
22.29
market consensus · no value · model 40.7%
X3.07
market consensus · draw accounted for as risk, not as a signal
13.28
market consensus · no value · model 29.3%
Double chance
121.36
market consensus · no value · model 70.0%
1X1.53
market consensus · no value · model 59.3%
X21.32
market consensus · no value · model 70.7%
Handicap
2 -0.52.23
market consensus · line only
2 01.63
market consensus · line only
1 +0.51.61
market consensus · line only
1 02.20
market consensus · line only
Total
Over 2.52.22
market consensus · line only
Under 2.51.64
market consensus · line only
Both teams to score
No1.86
market consensus · line only
Yes1.88
market consensus · line only
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
Bookmaker line
Match markets
bookmaker line and markets
Match Winner
Outcome
10Bet
1xBet
Bet365
Betano
Betfair
BetVictor
3.2530.8%
3.3829.6%
3.3030.3%
3.4529.0%
3.2530.8%
3.1032.3%
X
3.1032.3%
3.0832.5%
3.1032.3%
3.2031.3%
3.1032.3%
3.1032.3%
2.2843.9%
2.3143.3%
2.3043.5%
2.3742.2%
2.2544.4%
2.2045.5%
Both teams to score
Outcome
Leon
no
1.8653.8%
yes
1.8853.2%
Double chance
Outcome
Baltbet
Betcity
12
1.3673.5%
1.3673.5%
1x
1.5365.4%
1.5365.4%
x2
1.3275.8%
1.3275.8%
Exact Score
Outcome
10Bet
0_0
7.5013.3%
0_1
6.0016.7%
0_2
9.0011.1%
0_3
19.005.3%
0_4
46.002.2%
0_5
126.000.8%
1_0
7.0014.3%
1_1
5.2519.1%
1_2
7.5013.3%
1_3
15.006.7%
1_4
41.002.4%
1_5
101.001.0%
2_0
13.007.7%
2_1
9.0011.1%
2_2
13.007.7%
2_3
26.003.9%
2_4
61.001.6%
2_5
126.000.8%
Match center
Form & head-to-head
H2H 0-1-1, avg 1.0 gls
2026-08-02 · Remo 0:0 Santos
2026-04-02 · Remo 0:2 Santos
Source: ruscore
Odds · 5 bookmakers
Best price: 1 3.55 (Winline) · X 3.15 (Winline) · 2 2.34 (Betcity)
We use cookies to run the site and to understand how it’s used. Click “Accept all” to agree, or set your choice with “Cookie settings”. Read our cookie policy.
