AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Barry C / Broom C. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Gray A / Rybakov A | Barry C / Broom C | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 100% | 83.3% |
| Hard % | 100% | 83.3% |
| Clay % | 0% | 0% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 0% | 0% |
| Tie-breaks % | 100% | 66.7% |
| Titles (total) | 0 | 1 |
| Last 10 | W | LWWWWW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Gray A / Rybakov A | Barry C / Broom C | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 4.68 | 5.94 |
| Double faults per match | 2.84 | 2.12 |
| Breaks per match | 1.53 | 2.84 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 29.4% 5 / 17 Matches | 72.9% 35 / 48 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 36.7% 11 / 30 Matches | 72.4% 55 / 76 Matches |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 54.6% 6 / 11 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 54.6% 6 / 11 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 50.0% 1 / 2 Matches | 55.6% 5 / 9 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 50.0% 1 / 2 Matches | 55.6% 5 / 9 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| Wins this year | 40.0% 12 / 30 Matches | 67.8% 40 / 59 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 41.9% 18 / 43 Matches | 69.0% 60 / 87 Matches |
| Current rank | 507 | 289 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $176,503 USD | $286,390 USD |
| Rating | 507 | 289 |
| Age | 29 | 28 |
| Height | 1.85m | 1.78m |
| Weight | 77kg | 82kg |
| Playing hand | Left-handed | Right-handed |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 40 % | 68 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 40 % | 68 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 27 % | 51 % |
| Wins From Behind | 18 % | 21 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 70 % | 81 % |
| Set 1 Win | 43 % | 68 % |
| Set 2 Win | 53 % | 64 % |
| Set 3 Win | 31 % | 56 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 1 | 4 |
| 1st serve percentage | 83% | 61% |
| 1st serve points won | 67% (44/66) | 69% (34/49) |
| 2nd serve points won | 29% (4/14) | 58% (18/31) |
| Break Points Saved | 7/10 | 10/10 |
| 1st return points won | 31% (15/49) | 33% (22/66) |
| 2nd return points won | 42% (13/31) | 71% (10/14) |
| Break Points Converted | 0/10 | 3/10 |
| Service Points Won | 60% (48/80) | 65% (52/80) |
| Return Points Won | 35% (28/80) | 40% (32/80) |
| Total Points Won | 48% (76/160) | 53% (84/160) |
| Last 10 balls | 4 | 6 |
| Match points saved | 4 | 0 |
| Service games won | 73% (8/11) | 100% (10/10) |
| Return games won | 0% (0/10) | 27% (3/11) |
| Total games won | 38% (8/21) | 62% (13/21) |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.83 | 9.39 | 9.61 |
| Over 6.5 | 97 % | 97 % | 97 % |
| Over 7.5 | 90 % | 88 % | 89 % |
| Over 8.5 | 70 % | 66 % | 68 % |
| Over 9.5 | 50 % | 37 % | 44 % |
| Over 10.5 | 30 % | 20 % | 25 % |
| Over 11.5 | 30 % | 20 % | 25 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 4.68 | 5.94 | 10.62 |
| Most Aces in a match | 53 % | 47 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 95 % | 85 % | 98 % |
| 2+ | 68 % | 79 % | 93 % |
| 3+ | 58 % | 65 % | 92 % |
| 4+ | 58 % | 62 % | 86 % |
| 5+ | 47 % | 53 % | 74 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 1.53 | 2.84 | 4.37 |
| Over 0.5 | 42 % | 94 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 37 % | 91 % | 97 % |
| Over 2.5 | 37 % | 24 % | 96 % |
| Over 3.5 | 0 % | 6 % | 47 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 3 % | 36 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 3 % | 36 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.3 | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| Over 0.5 | 30 % | 29 % | 29 % |
| Over 1.5 | 0 % | 5 % | 3 % |
| Under 0.5 | 70 % | 71 % | 29 % |
| Under 1.5 | 100 % | 95 % | 3 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 2.84 | 2.12 | 4.96 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 84 % | 76 % | 96 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 58 % | 56 % | 92 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 53 % | 35 % | 80 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 42 % | 26 % | 69 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 32 % | 9 % | 56 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 11 % | 6 % | 47 % |
| Alex Rybakov | Charles Broom | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 10.5 | 8.07 | 18.57 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 100 % | 73 % | 87 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 93 % | 67 % | 80 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 86 % | 33 % | 60 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 79 % | 27 % | 53 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 79 % | 20 % | 50 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 79 % | 20 % | 50 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Gray A / Rybakov A take on Barry C / Broom C on August 21, 2026 in the ATP Challenger. Roehampton. Doubles, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Gray A / Rybakov A 2-0-0, Barry C / Broom C 3-0-0. Full analysis — form, H2H, odds and the PropickAI AI prediction — follows on this page.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
2 Barry C / Broom C — 53%
Model estimate: win Gray A / Rybakov A 46.8%, win Barry C / Broom C 53.2%. Model favourite — Barry C / Broom C.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 2 books (Betcity, Fonbet). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Model consensus
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
AI overview
AI analysis:1/7 ready · Still preparing:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Claude, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
Current Form and Head-to-Head History
The home team of Alastair Gray and Alex Rybakov kicked off their partnership successfully at the Roehampton Challenger by securing a straight-sets victory (6-0, 6-6 [7-3]) against M. Dhamne and G. Perego in the round of 16. However, analyzing their individual recent records reveals contrasting levels of activity. Alastair Gray has played sparsely in recent months, whereas Alex Rybakov has been heavily active across the Challenger circuit, showing mixed results in singles but standard match fitness. As a newly formed pairing for this tournament, they possess a clean sheet of 1 win and 0 losses.
The away pairing consisting of Charles Barry and Charles Broom enters this quarterfinal match with slightly higher combined momentum. Seeded 3rd in the tournament, they fought through a challenging round of 16 tiebreaker match against C. Gannon and J. MacKinlay, coming out victorious with a 6-7, 6-3, 12-10 match tiebreak decision. Over their last matches, Charles Broom has shown magnificent individual form on British hard and grass courts, which includes a dominant straight-sets singles win over Rybakov himself just 24 hours prior to this match at this very venue.
Head-to-Head (H2H): There are no prior professional encounters recorded between these two specific doubles line-ups. However, Charles Broom possesses a fresh psychological edge over Alex Rybakov after defeating him 7-5, 6-3 in the singles round of 16.
Polymarket
+1
Injuries and Suspensions: No physical injuries, medical retirements, or technical suspensions are reported for any of the four active competitors.
Polymarket
Probability Analysis and Market Divergence
The analytical model assigns a narrow edge to the home team with probabilities set at P1 51% / P2 49%. While the model evaluates the individual raw baseline serve and volley metrics highly for Gray and Rybakov, my expert analysis subtly diverges toward the away team, adjusting the baseline valuation to P1 47% / P2 53%.
The reasoning for this variance centers around local conditions, motivation, and fresh head-to-head tape. Charles Broom is playing some of the most consistent tennis of his career on home soil and has established full structural rhythm at the National Tennis Centre. Having already cracked Rybakov’s baseline game in singles on August 19, Broom understands exactly how to attack his opponent's second serve. Coupled with Charles Barry's steady net play, the 3rd-seeded away team exhibits superior synergy under high-pressure deuce points and match tiebreaks compared to the newer Gray/Rybakov tandem.
LTA
+3
Additional Markets and Game Totals
Fast, outdoor hardcourt surfaces at Roehampton naturally favor aggressive serving structures, leading to a low variance in broken service games. Both duos feature players with big first serves; Gray and Rybakov hammered 7 aces in their opening match, while Barry and Broom hit 6 aces.
Wikipedia
+1
Total Games Forecast: Given the standard ATP Challenger doubles format—where a deciding match tiebreak replaces a traditional third set—the match length typically stays compressed. A line of Under 22.5 Games offers high mathematical utility. A 2-set match finishing 7-5, 6-4 hits the under comfortably, and even a 6-4, 4-6 split going into a 10-point match tiebreak counts as only 21 total games.
Polymarket
Exact Set Score: The away side is primed to capitalize on Broom's tactical momentum. Expect a tight first set followed by a late break in the second, resulting in a 0:2 victory for Barry/Broom.
Conclusion and Main Bet
The recommended play is to back the away team based on Broom's superior match fitness and his recent psychological victory over Rybakov on these exact courts.
If you would like to explore this further, let me know if you want to look at:
The live weather conditions in Roehampton that could affect court speed.
Individual singles fatigue levels for players pulling double duty.
Detailed service hold percentages for Charles Broom this season.
| AI | 1 | 2 | Score | Total games | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 47% | 53% | 0:2 | Under 22.5 | Barry Ch / Brum Ch win |
Get the 7-AI consensus, math-model probabilities, value picks and full reports for every match with Full Access.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko46.8% · +Elo prior (weight0.60).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Betcity | Fonbet |
|---|---|---|
| 2.00 50.0% | 1.95 51.3% | |
| 1.72 58.1% | 1.75 57.1% |
Gray A / Rybakov A
Barry C / Broom C
The Gray A / Rybakov A - Barry C / Broom C breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
August 21, 2026.