Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles

Andrade A / Zink T - Chidekh C / Grenier H

🎯 PropickAI prediction
Low confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

1 Andrade A / Zink T58%

Pure model vs market (1 · Andrade A / Zink T): model 52% · market 59% Δ −7 pp model estimates below the market

1 · Andrade A / Zink T58.2%
market59%
2 · Chidekh C / Grenier H41.8%
market41%

Model estimate: win Andrade A / Zink T 58.2%, win Chidekh C / Grenier H 41.8%. Model favourite — Andrade A / Zink T.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

1Andrade A / Zink T (odds1.56) Score 2:1 confidence 50%
  • Andrade A./Zink T
  • — Chidekh C./Grene U
  • (tennis)
  • Model backs Andrade A./Zink T.: probability 50% vs 64% on the line (odds 1.56)
  • no edge over the line (-14 pp) — informational only.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Andrade A / Zink T - Chidekh C / Grenier H July 29, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite Fonbet: Andrade A / Zink T. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 1.55 / 2 2.25

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 9.0%
1 59.2%
2 40.8%

Odds source: Fonbet. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

Tennis ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles hard 29.07.2026 15:00 UTC Not started
29.07.2026 15:00 UTC Not started
A
Andrade A / Zink T
C
Chidekh C / Grenier H
-:-
Odds
P1 1.58 59.0% BetBoom
P2 2.27 41.0% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
Match center
Start 29.07.2026 15:00 UTC
Coverage hard
Match center

Andrade A / Zink T - Chidekh C / Grenier H

H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Match Participants Line
More needed
Form Championat, Flashscore
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Movement Line history
Overview Championat
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Andrade A / Zink T 58.9% 58.2% market and model agree
Chidekh C / Grenier H 41.1% 41.8%

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 58.2% / 41.8% probabilities
Rating 1,500 / 1,500 Andrade A / Zink T / Chidekh C / Grenier H
RD 350 / 350 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 800-2,200 / 800-2,200 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 2.25 Fonbet · no value · model 41.8%
1 1.55 Fonbet · no value · model 58.2%

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Open on Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Fonbet Leon
1.57 63.7% 1.56 64.1% 1.55 64.5% 1.58 63.3%
2.25 44.4% 2.27 44.1% 2.25 44.4% 2.24 44.6%