| Van de Zandschulp B | Hurkacz H | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 50% | 59.3% |
| Hard % | 0% | 59.2% |
| Clay % | 50% | 57.8% |
| Grass % | 0% | 62.5% |
| Deciding set % | 0% | 55% |
| Tie-breaks % | 0% | 52.2% |
| Titles (total) | 0 | 8 |
| Last 10 | LW | WWLWWWLWLL |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Van de Zandschulp B | Hurkacz H | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 5.26 | 11.14 |
| Double faults per match | 4.48 | 2.36 |
| Breaks per match | 2.17 | 1.05 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 50.0% 6 / 12 Matches | 25.0% 2 / 8 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 50.0% 16 / 32 Matches | 25.0% 2 / 8 Matches |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 58.3% 7 / 12 Matches | 63.6% 7 / 11 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 58.3% 7 / 12 Matches | 63.6% 7 / 11 Matches |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 33.3% 1 / 3 Matches | 33.3% 1 / 3 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 33.3% 1 / 3 Matches | 33.3% 1 / 3 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Sets | 3 (60.0%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| Wins this year | 50.0% 17 / 34 Matches | 50.0% 15 / 30 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 50.0% 27 / 54 Matches | 50.0% 15 / 30 Matches |
| Current rank | 70 | 72 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $5,629,377 USD | $16,338,254 USD |
| Rating | 70 | 72 |
| Age | 30 | 29 |
| Height | 1.91m | 1.96m |
| Weight | 85kg | 81kg |
| Playing hand | Right-handed | Right-handed |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 50 % | 50 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 52 % | 45 % |
| Match Wins (5 Sets) | 50 % | 50 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 35 % | 27 % |
| Wins From Behind | 6 % | 21 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 76 % | 73 % |
| Set 1 Win | 59 % | 60 % |
| Set 2 Win | 50 % | 47 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Date | Tournament | Results |
|---|---|---|
| May 30 2021 | French Open ATP (Clay) | Botic Van De Zandschulp 3 – 2 Hubert Hurkacz |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 10 | 10.5 | 10.25 |
| Over 6.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 7.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 8.5 | 89 % | 82 % | 86 % |
| Over 9.5 | 48 % | 64 % | 56 % |
| Over 10.5 | 37 % | 32 % | 35 % |
| Over 11.5 | 37 % | 32 % | 35 % |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 5.26 | 11.14 | 16.40 |
| Most Aces in a match | 44 % | 95 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 89 % | 100 % | 97 % |
| 2+ | 85 % | 100 % | 97 % |
| 3+ | 70 % | 95 % | 95 % |
| 4+ | 59 % | 91 % | 87 % |
| 5+ | 44 % | 91 % | 87 % |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 2.17 | 1.05 | 3.22 |
| Over 0.5 | 93 % | 55 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 59 % | 0 % | 78 % |
| Over 2.5 | 7 % | 0 % | 76 % |
| Over 3.5 | 4 % | 0 % | 45 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 21 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 2 % |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.56 | 0.73 | 0.64 |
| Over 0.5 | 52 % | 55 % | 53 % |
| Over 1.5 | 4 % | 18 % | 11 % |
| Under 0.5 | 48 % | 45 % | 53 % |
| Under 1.5 | 96 % | 82 % | 11 % |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 4.48 | 2.36 | 6.84 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 100 % | 77 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 89 % | 55 % | 96 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 81 % | 41 % | 81 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 67 % | 27 % | 75 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 44 % | 18 % | 60 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 26 % | 5 % | 50 % |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | Hubert Hurkacz | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 7.07 | 7.83 | 14.9 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 70 % | 80 % | 75 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 70 % | 70 % | 70 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 61 % | 70 % | 66 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 61 % | 55 % | 58 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 57 % | 50 % | 54 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 48 % | 40 % | 44 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Van de Zandschulp B go head-to-head with Hurkacz H on August 7, 2026 in the ATP - Singles: Monreal (Canada), hard.
Recent form (W-D-L): Van de Zandschulp B 2-0-0, Hurkacz H 2-0-0. Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PrognozAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Hurkacz H — 66%
Pure model vs market (2 · Hurkacz H): model 51% · market 68% Δ −17 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Van de Zandschulp B 33.9%, win Hurkacz H 66.1%. Model favourite — Hurkacz H.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 3 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
Head-to-head and form stats
Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics — for reference.
Onlayn translyatsiya tennisnogo matcha Botik van de Zandskhulp - Khubert Khurkach. Monreal. Vsya informatsiya: statistika, novosti, intervyu, foto
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko33.9% · +Elo prior (weight0.31).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.72 58.1% | 1.72 58.1% | 1.78 56.2% | |
| 2.10 47.6% | 2.12 47.2% | 2.00 50.0% |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 22.5 | 1.82 55.0% | 1.82 55.0% | 1.80 55.6% |
| Under 22.5 | 1.97 50.8% | 1.98 50.5% | 1.98 50.5% |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.00 33.3% | 2.65 37.7% | 2.95 33.9% | |
| 1.39 71.9% | 1.48 67.6% | 1.39 71.9% |
Van de Zandschulp B
Medvedev D. (World)
Mpeshi-Perrikar Dzh. 🇫🇷
Hurkacz H
Tabilo A. 🇨🇱
Khiron M. 🇺🇸
Full head-to-head historyVan de Zandschulp B - Hurkacz H
The Van de Zandschulp B - Hurkacz H breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.