AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Draper J. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Landaluce M | Draper J | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 52.8% | 64.9% |
| Hard % | 56.2% | 66.4% |
| Clay % | 46.4% | 56.8% |
| Grass % | 57.9% | 68.8% |
| Deciding set % | 57.1% | 47.4% |
| Tie-breaks % | 47.1% | 57.6% |
| Titles (total) | 2 | 3 |
| Last 10 | LLLLLWWLWL | LLWWWLLLWW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Landaluce M | Draper J | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 6.75 | 5.08 |
| Double faults per match | 1.83 | 4.13 |
| Breaks per match | 1.79 | 2.97 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 50.0% 4 / 8 Matches | 50.0% 11 / 22 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 55.6% 5 / 9 Matches | 58.3% 28 / 48 Matches |
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 58.3% 7 / 12 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 58.3% 7 / 12 Matches |
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 75.0% 3 / 4 Matches | 50.0% 3 / 6 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 75.0% 3 / 4 Matches | 50.0% 3 / 6 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 53.9% 7 / 13 Matches | 51.1% 23 / 45 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 57.1% 8 / 14 Matches | 54.1% 40 / 74 Matches |
| Current rank | 143 | 64 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $4,481,566 USD | $602,342 USD |
| Rating | 143 | 64 |
| Age | 24 | 20 |
| Height | 1.93m | 1.93m |
| Weight | 85kg | 80kg |
| Playing hand | Left-handed | Right-handed |
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 54 % | 51 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 58 % | 53 % |
| Match Wins (5 Sets) | N/A | 67 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 38 % | 29 % |
| Wins From Behind | 25 % | 22 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 77 % | 78 % |
| Set 1 Win | 46 % | 51 % |
| Set 2 Win | 69 % | 53 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 10 | 9.36 | 9.68 |
| Over 6.5 | 100 % | 95 % | 98 % |
| Over 7.5 | 75 % | 90 % | 83 % |
| Over 8.5 | 75 % | 78 % | 77 % |
| Over 9.5 | 58 % | 43 % | 51 % |
| Over 10.5 | 42 % | 18 % | 30 % |
| Over 11.5 | 42 % | 18 % | 30 % |
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 6.75 | 5.08 | 11.83 |
| Most Aces in a match | 42 % | 36 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 100 % | 97 % | 99 % |
| 2+ | 100 % | 82 % | 99 % |
| 3+ | 83 % | 69 % | 95 % |
| 4+ | 75 % | 59 % | 93 % |
| 5+ | 67 % | 46 % | 90 % |
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 1.79 | 2.97 | 4.76 |
| Over 0.5 | 50 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 42 % | 97 % | 96 % |
| Over 2.5 | 0 % | 54 % | 71 % |
| Over 3.5 | 0 % | 54 % | 71 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 51 % | 70 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 44 % |
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
| Over 0.5 | 42 % | 28 % | 35 % |
| Over 1.5 | 8 % | 3 % | 5 % |
| Under 0.5 | 58 % | 73 % | 35 % |
| Under 1.5 | 92 % | 98 % | 5 % |
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 1.83 | 4.13 | 5.96 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 83 % | 97 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 50 % | 85 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 25 % | 72 % | 85 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 17 % | 62 % | 56 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 8 % | 36 % | 51 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 0 % | 28 % | 47 % |
| Jack Draper | Martin Landaluce | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 4.65 | 5.24 | 9.89 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 30 % | 57 % | 44 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 10 % | 46 % | 28 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 0 % | 35 % | 18 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 0 % | 30 % | 15 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 0 % | 22 % | 11 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 0 % | 14 % | 7 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Landaluce M go head-to-head with Draper J on August 13, 2026 in the ATP Cincinnati, USA Men Singles.
PropickAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 33% to win. Read on for detailed stats, previous meetings, the bookmaker line and the PropickAI neural-network verdict.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Draper J — 67%
Model estimate: win Landaluce M 32.7%, win Draper J 67.3%. Model favourite — Draper J.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Draper J.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 3 books (Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
Onlayn translyatsiya tennisnogo matcha Martin Landalus - Dzhek Dreyper. Tsintsinnati (m). Vsya informatsiya: statistika, novosti, intervyu, foto
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko32.7% · +Elo prior (weight0.43).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Leon |
|---|---|
| 1.91 52.4% | |
| 1.86 53.8% |
| Outcome | Kambi BetMGM |
|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 2.40 41.7% |
| Over 2.5 | 2.48 40.3% |
| Over 4.5 | 1.81 55.3% |
| Over 5.5 | 2.10 47.6% |
| Over 7.5 | 1.07 93.5% |
| Over 8.5 | 1.24 80.7% |
| Over 9.5 | 1.74 57.5% |
| Over 10.5 | 3.15 31.8% |
| Over 12.5 | 4.50 22.2% |
| Over 19.5 | 1.38 72.5% |
| Over 20.5 | 1.56 64.1% |
| Over 21.5 | 1.70 58.8% |
| Over 22.5 | 1.96 51.0% |
| Over 23.5 | 2.23 44.8% |
| Over 24.5 | 2.28 43.9% |
| Over 25.5 | 2.48 40.3% |
| Under 0.5 | 1.53 65.4% |
| Under 10.5 | 1.33 75.2% |
| Outcome | Kambi BetMGM | Kambi Unibet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.20 31.3% | 3.20 31.3% | 3.15 31.8% | |
| 1.35 74.1% | 1.35 74.1% | 1.34 74.6% |
Landaluce M
Draper J
The Landaluce M - Draper J breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
By the PropickAI model, Draper J is favoured — about 67% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Draper J. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 13, 2026.