| Wong C | Hong Seong Chan | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | N/A | 9.78 |
| Double faults per match | N/A | 2.25 |
| Breaks per match | N/A | 1.83 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 61.9% 26 / 42 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 61.8% 42 / 68 Matches |
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 40.0% 2 / 5 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 40.0% 2 / 5 Matches |
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 25.0% 1 / 4 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 25.0% 1 / 4 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Sets | 4 (66.7%) | 2 (33.3%) |
| Wins this year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 54.7% 29 / 53 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 57.5% 46 / 80 Matches |
| Current rank | - | 92 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $422,134 USD | $268,667 USD |
| Rating | — | 92 |
| Age | 29 | 22 |
| Height | 1.75m | 1.91m |
| Weight | 65kg | 80kg |
| Playing hand | Right-handed | Right-handed |
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | N/A | 55 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | N/A | 57 % |
| Match Wins (5 Sets) | N/A | 0 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | N/A | 38 % |
| Wins From Behind | N/A | 17 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | N/A | 77 % |
| Set 1 Win | N/A | 57 % |
| Set 2 Win | N/A | 58 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Date | Tournament | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 12 2024 | Busan Chall. Men (Hard) | Seong Chan Hong 2 – 1 Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
| Sep 27 2023 | Asian Games ATP (Hard) | Seong Chan Hong 2 – 1 Chak Lam Coleman Wong |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | N/A | 10.04 | 4.52 |
| Over 6.5 | N/A | 100 % | 50 % |
| Over 7.5 | N/A | 92 % | 46 % |
| Over 8.5 | N/A | 80 % | 40 % |
| Over 9.5 | N/A | 51 % | 25 % |
| Over 10.5 | N/A | 29 % | 14 % |
| Over 11.5 | N/A | 29 % | 14 % |
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | N/A | 9.78 | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | 88 % | N/A |
| 1+ | N/A | 98 % | N/A |
| 2+ | N/A | 98 % | N/A |
| 3+ | N/A | 98 % | N/A |
| 4+ | N/A | 96 % | N/A |
| 5+ | N/A | 90 % | N/A |
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | N/A | 1.83 | N/A |
| Over 0.5 | N/A | 98 % | N/A |
| Over 1.5 | N/A | 16 % | N/A |
| Over 2.5 | N/A | 10 % | N/A |
| Over 3.5 | N/A | 8 % | N/A |
| Over 4.5 | N/A | 2 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 | N/A | 0 % | N/A |
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | N/A | 0.41 | N/A |
| Over 0.5 | N/A | 37 % | 18 % |
| Over 1.5 | N/A | 4 % | 1 % |
| Under 0.5 | N/A | 63 % | 18 % |
| Under 1.5 | N/A | 96 % | 1 % |
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | N/A | 2.25 | N/A |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | N/A | 82 % | N/A |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | N/A | 61 % | N/A |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | N/A | 35 % | N/A |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | N/A | 22 % | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | N/A | 14 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | N/A | 8 % | N/A |
| Seong Chan Hong | Chak Lam Coleman Wong | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | N/A | 8.01 | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | N/A | 80 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | N/A | 70 % | N/A |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | N/A | 68 % | N/A |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | N/A | 60 % | N/A |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | N/A | 48 % | N/A |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | N/A | 43 % | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Wong C take on Hong Seong Chan on August 11, 2026 in the ATP. Tsintsinnati, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Wong C 3-0-2, Hong Seong Chan 2-0-3. PrognozAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 78% to win. Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PrognozAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
1 Wong C — 78%
Pure model vs market (1 · Wong C): model 57% · market 81% Δ −24 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Wong C 77.9%, win Hong Seong Chan 22.1%. Model favourite — Wong C.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Wong C.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 6 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Head-to-head and form stats
no data
Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics — for reference.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Fonbet |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 1.16 86.2% | |
| — | — | 1.19 84.0% | |
| — | — | 1.25 80.0% | |
| 1.64 61.0% | 1.73 57.8% | — | |
| — | 2.13 47.0% | — | |
| — | — | 4.80 20.8% | |
| 2.13 47.0% | 2.10 47.6% | — | |
| — | 1.72 58.1% | — | |
| — | — | 4.60 21.7% | |
| — | — | 4.15 24.1% | |
| — | — | 3.60 27.8% | |
| — | — | 2.80 35.7% | |
| — | — | 3.00 33.3% | |
| — | — | 2.25 44.4% | |
| — | — | 1.40 71.4% | |
| — | — | 1.15 87.0% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.03 97.1% | |
| 1.01 99.0% | |
| 14.00 7.1% | |
| 8.50 11.8% |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Fonbet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 17.5 | — | — | 1.28 78.1% |
| Over 18.5 | — | — | 2.25 44.4% |
| Over 19.5 | — | 1.85 54.1% | 3.00 33.3% |
| Over 20.5 | 1.81 55.3% | 2.00 50.0% | 2.15 46.5% |
| Over 21.5 | — | — | 2.15 46.5% |
| Over 22.5 | — | — | 2.50 40.0% |
| Over 23.5 | — | — | 2.80 35.7% |
| Over 24.5 | — | — | 2.95 33.9% |
| Over 25.5 | — | — | 3.30 30.3% |
| Under 17.5 | — | — | 3.30 30.3% |
| Under 18.5 | — | — | 1.60 62.5% |
| Under 19.5 | — | 1.95 51.3% | 1.35 74.1% |
| Under 20.5 | 1.91 52.4% | 1.82 55.0% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 14.00 7.1% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.01 99.0% |
| Bookmaker | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pari | 1.19 | 4.8 |
| Winline | 1.17 | 5 |
| Fonbet | 1.18 | 4.8 |
| Betcity | 1.16 | 5.2 |
Wong C
Hong Seong Chan
Full head-to-head historyWong C - Hong Seong Chan
The Wong C - Hong Seong Chan breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
By the PropickAI model, Wong C is favoured — about 78% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Wong C. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 11, 2026.