Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
Challenger Men - Singles: Leksington πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ, hard
Challenger Men - Singles: Leksington πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ, hard

McCabe J - Lajovic D

McCabe J take on Lajovic D on August 2, 2026 in the Challenger Men - Singles: Leksington πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ, hard.

Recent form (W-D-L): McCabe J 1-0-4, Lajovic D 1-1-3. Read on for detailed stats, previous meetings, the bookmaker line and the PrognozAI neural-network verdict.

🎯 PropickAI prediction
Low confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model Β· comparison with the market line (no margin)

2 Lajovic D β€” 59%

Pure model vs market (2 Β· Lajovic D): model 41% Β· market 62% Ξ” βˆ’21 pp model estimates below the market

1 Β· McCabe J40.5%
market38%
2 Β· Lajovic D59.5%
market62%

Model estimate: win McCabe J 40.5%, win Lajovic D 59.5%. Model favourite β€” Lajovic D.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

1McCabe J (odds2.40) Score 2:1 confidence 59%
  • Makkeyb Dzh
  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί β€” Layovich D
  • πŸ‡·πŸ‡Έ (tennis)
  • Makkeyb Dzh
  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί: forma PPVPP (1-4)
  • Layovich D
  • πŸ‡·πŸ‡Έ: forma PPPPP (0-5)
  • Model backs Makkeyb Dzh
  • πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί: probability 59% vs 42% on the line (odds 2.40)
  • edge over the line +17 pp β€” value pick.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction McCabe J - Lajovic D August 2, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite Fonbet: Lajovic D. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 2.40 / 2 1.50

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin β€” for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 8.3%
1 38.5%
2 61.5%

Odds source: Fonbet. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds β€” reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

For reference

Line movement

How the odds changed from opening to the current line β€” for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Pobeditel P1 2.40 β†’ 2.40
Pobeditel P2 1.50 β†’ 1.50

↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.

Head-to-head and form stats

Head-to-head and form

Team form

McCabe J
6-4LLWWLWWWLW
scored 1.2conceded 1.1
Lajovic D
4-6LLLWWLLWLW
scored 0.9conceded 1.4

Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics β€” for reference.

Tennis Challenger Men - Singles: Leksington πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ, hard
Challenger Men - Singles: Leksington πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ, hard hard 02.08.2026 14:00 UTC Not started
02.08.2026 14:00 UTC Not started
McCabe J
McCabe J
L L L W L
Lajovic D
Lajovic D
L L L L W
-:-
Odds
P1 2.45 38.4% BetBoom
P2 1.53 61.6% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
Match center
Start 02.08.2026 14:00 UTC
Market 1 38.5% @ 2.40 / 2 61.5% @ 1.50
Coverage hard
Form 6 matches
Match center

McCabe J - Lajovic D

V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.

Form 5/5 recent games
H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Bookiesapi match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Form Match Participants Line Movement Overview
More needed
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
McCabe J 38.5% 40.5%
Lajovic D 61.5% 59.5% market and model agree

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 40.5% / 59.5% probabilities
Rating 1,453 / 1,252 Romboli F / Smith J P / Lajovic D
RD 125 / 216 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 1,203-1,703 / 819-1,684 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 1.50 Fonbet Β· no value Β· model 59.5%
1 2.40 Fonbet Β· no value Β· model 40.5%
Total
Over 21.5 1.80 Fonbet Β· line only
Under 21.5 1.90 Fonbet Β· line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Open on Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Betcity Fonbet
1.93 51.8%
1.75 57.1%
1.95 51.3%
1.77 56.5%

Total

Outcome Betcity Fonbet
Over 21.5 1.78 56.2% 1.80 55.6%
Under 21.5 1.92 52.1% 1.90 52.6%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Betcity Fonbet Leon
2.45 40.8% 2.40 41.7% 2.34 42.7%
1.49 67.1% 1.50 66.7% 1.53 65.4%
Match center
McCabe J
L L L W L
2026-07-25 2026 Washington, USA, Qualifying
McCabe J McCabe J 0:2 Bolt A
2026-07-21 2026 Winnipeg, Canada
McCabe J McCabe J 1:2 Chan Duncan
2026-07-16 2026 Lincoln, USA
McCabe J McCabe J 0:2 Tomic B
2026-07-15 2026 Lincoln, USA
McCabe J Imamura M 0:2 McCabe J
2026-07-08 2026 Newport, USA
McCabe J McCabe J 0:2 Jung Jason
1 Wins
4 Losses
0.6 Sets won
1.6 Sets lost
20% Win percentage
Lajovic D
D L L L W
2026-07-25 2026 Washington, USA, Qualifying
Hewitt Cruz 0:0 Lajovic D Lajovic D
2026-07-13 2026 Umag, Croatia
Lajovic D 1:2 Van Assche L Lajovic D
2026-06-30 2026 Wimbledon, London, Great Britain
Fritz T 3:0 Lajovic D Lajovic D
2026-06-25 2026 Wimbledon, London, GB, Qualifying, 3rd Round
Gaubas V 3:2 Lajovic D Lajovic D
2026-06-24 2026 Wimbledon, London, GB, Qualifying, 1st - 2nd Round
Rodesch C 0:2 Lajovic D Lajovic D
1 Wins
3 Losses
1.0 Sets won
1.6 Sets lost
20% Win percentage
Match center

Full head-to-head historyMcCabe J - Lajovic D

McCabe J
0 matches total
Lajovic D
Biggest win β€” largest score margin
Highest-scoring match β€” most goals in a game
Highest-scoring draw β€” draw with the most goals

Match history