Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
ATP Challenger. Vancouver
ATP Challenger. Vancouver

Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ - Zink T

Tennis ATP Challenger. Vancouver
ATP Challenger. Vancouver hard 29.07.2026 17:00 UTC Finished
29.07.2026 17:00 UTC Finished
T
Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Z
Zink T
1:2
Odds
P1 2.05 46.9% BetBoom
P2 1.81 53.1% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
🎯 PropickAI prediction

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

2 Zink T β€” 52%

Pure model vs market (2 Β· Zink T): model 39% Β· market 53% Ξ” βˆ’14 pp model estimates below the market

1 Β· Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅48.4%
2 Β· Zink T51.6%

Model estimate: win Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ 48.4%, win Zink T 51.6%. Model favourite β€” Zink T.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

1Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ (odds1.87) Score 2:1 confidence 51% βœ— outcome missed
  • Trotter J
  • K
  • πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ β€” Zink T
  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (tennis)
  • Trotter J
  • K
  • πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅: forma VVVVP (4-1)
  • Zink T
  • πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ: forma VPPVP (2-3)
  • Model backs Trotter J
  • K
  • πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅: probability 51% vs 53% on the line (odds 1.87)
  • no edge over the line (-2 pp) β€” informational only.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ - Zink T July 29, 2026

Tennis math model

Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Zink T.

Line favourite market consensus: Zink T. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (market consensus): 1 2.05 / 2 1.81
  • Glicko: Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ 48.4% / Zink T 51.6%

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin β€” for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 4.0%
1 46.9%
2 53.1%

Odds source: market consensus. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds β€” reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

Head-to-head and form stats

Head-to-head and form

Team form

Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
4-6LLWLWLWLWL
scored 1.0conceded 1.4
Zink T

no data

Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics β€” for reference.

Match center
Start 29.07.2026 17:00 UTC
Coverage hard
Form 6 matches
Match center

Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ - Zink T

V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.

Form 5/5 recent games
H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Form Match Participants Line Overview
More needed
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Movement Line history
Post-match / PropickAI database
Score 1:2
Events 0
Statistics 0
PropickAI check: math model and Glicko-2

We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.

Option Signal Prediction / actual Rating
Glicko-2: base favourite Audit tennis is audit-only for now: surface, serve/return and market are needed Data: line, form, coverage away - 51.6% fact: away hit / ROI 81.0% / Brier 0.468 / LogLoss 0.661
Glicko-2: calibrated favourite Audit tennis is audit-only for now: surface, serve/return and market are needed Data: line, form, coverage away - 50.2% fact: away hit / ROI 81.0% / Brier 0.496 / LogLoss 0.689
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ 46.9% 48.4%
Zink T 53.1% 51.6% market and model agree
1X2: 3 Bookies

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 48.4% / 51.6% probabilities
Rating 1,758 / 1,473 Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ / Zink T
RD 187 / 210 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 1,383-2,132 / 1,052-1,893 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 1.75 market consensus Β· no value Β· model 51.6%
1 1.98 market consensus Β· no value Β· model 48.4%
Handicap
2 -0.5 1.82 market consensus Β· line only
2 +0.5 1.81 market consensus Β· line only
1 -0.5 1.93 market consensus Β· line only
1 +0.5 1.91 market consensus Β· line only
Total
Over 22.5 1.77 market consensus Β· line only
Over 23.5 1.97 market consensus Β· line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Leon
1.91 52.4% 1.91 52.4%
1.72 58.1% 1.84 54.4%
1.91 52.4% 1.94 51.6%
2.02 49.5%
1.81 55.3% 1.81 55.3%
1.70 58.8%
1.81 55.3% 1.83 54.6%
2.00 50.0% 1.90 52.6%

Total

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Leon
Over 22.5 1.76 56.8% 1.74 57.5% 1.80 55.6%
Over 23.5 1.97 50.8% 1.97 50.8%
Under 22.5 1.97 50.8% 1.98 50.5% 1.94 51.6%
Under 23.5 1.74 57.5% 1.78 56.2%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Leon
1.98 50.5% 1.90 52.6% 2.05 48.8%
1.75 57.1% 1.81 55.3% 1.69 59.2%
Match center
Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
W W W W L
28.07 17:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Vankuver (Canada) - Qualifying, hard
Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ 2:0 Matsuoka H. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅Matsuoka H. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
27.07 20:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Vankuver (Canada) - Qualifying, hard
Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ 2:1 Arseneault M. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦Arseneault M. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
20.07 17:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Winnipeg (Canada) - Qualifying, hard
Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ 2:0 Isomura K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
19.07 19:15 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Winnipeg (Canada) - Qualifying, hard
Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ 2:0 Dalmasso G. πŸ‡«πŸ‡·Dalmasso G. πŸ‡«πŸ‡·
14.07 21:30 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Granbi (Canada), hard
Trotter J. K. πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅ 1:2 Draksl L. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦Draksl L. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
4 Wins
1 Losses
1.8 Sets won
0.6 Sets lost
80% Win percentage
Zink T
W L L W L
27.07 17:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Vankuver (Canada) - Qualifying, hard
Zink T 2:0 Arseneault N. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
21.07 17:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Winnipeg (Canada), hard
Zink T 0:2 Chzhan Ch. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³Chzhan Ch. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³
15.07 12:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Granbi (Canada), hard
Zink T 1:2 Galarno A. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦Galarno A. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
07.07 17:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Newport πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ - Qualifying, grass
Zink T 2:0 Baris O. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈBaris O. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
29.05 21:20 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Singles: Little Rock πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ, hard
Zink T 0:1 Smit K. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈSmit K. πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
2 Wins
3 Losses
1.0 Sets won
1.0 Sets lost
40% Win percentage