Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
Challenger Men - Doubles: Grodzisk Mazowiecki (Poland), hard
Challenger Men - Doubles: Grodzisk Mazowiecki (Poland), hard

Henning P./Sakellaridis D. - Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F.

Henning P./Sakellaridis D. face Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F. on August 2, 2026 in the Challenger Men - Doubles: Grodzisk Mazowiecki (Poland), hard.

Scroll down for team stats, head-to-head record, odds and the PrognozAI AI pick.

🎯 PropickAI prediction
Medium confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

1 Henning P./Sakellaridis D.65%

Pure model vs market (1 · Henning P./Sakellaridis D.): model 52% · market 66% Δ −14 pp model estimates below the market

1 · Henning P./Sakellaridis D. ✓ Pick64.7%
market66%
2 · Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F.35.3%
market34%

Model estimate: win Henning P./Sakellaridis D. 64.7%, win Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F. 35.3%. Model favourite — Henning P./Sakellaridis D..

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

1Henning P./Sakellaridis D. (odds1.40) Score 2:1 confidence 65%
  • Henning P./Sakellaridis D
  • — Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F
  • (tennis)
  • Model backs Henning P./Sakellaridis D.: probability 65% vs 71% on the line (odds 1.40)
  • no edge over the line (-7 pp) — informational only.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Henning P./Sakellaridis D. - Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F. August 2, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite market consensus: Henning P./Sakellaridis D.. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (market consensus): 1 1.40 / 2 2.75

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 7.8%
1 ✓ Pick 66.3%
2 33.7%

Odds source: market consensus. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

Tennis Challenger Men - Doubles: Grodzisk Mazowiecki (Poland), hard
Challenger Men - Doubles: Grodzisk Mazowiecki (Poland), hard hard 02.08.2026 09:00 UTC Not started
02.08.2026 09:00 UTC Not started
H
Henning P./Sakellaridis D.
L
Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F.
-:-
Odds
P1 1.40 66.3% BetBoom
P2 2.75 33.7% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
Match center
Start 02.08.2026 09:00 UTC
Market 1 66.3% @ 1.40 / 2 33.7% @ 2.75
Coverage hard
Match center

Henning P./Sakellaridis D. - Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F.

H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Match Participants Line
More needed
Form Championat, Flashscore
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Movement Line history
Overview Championat
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Henning P./Sakellaridis D. 66.1% 64.7% market and model agree
Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F. 33.9% 35.3%

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 64.7% / 35.3% probabilities
Rating 1,500 / 1,500 Henning P./Sakellaridis D. / Lalami Laarussi Yu./Pechonka F.
RD 350 / 350 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 800-2,200 / 800-2,200 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 2.73 market consensus · no value · model 35.3%
1 1.40 market consensus · no value · model 64.7%

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

bookmaker line and markets

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Betcity Leon
1.40 71.4% 1.40 71.4%
2.70 37.0% 2.75 36.4%