Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles

Jung J / Maginley J - Chan Duncan / George B T

Tennis ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles hard 29.07.2026 19:30 UTC Finished
29.07.2026 19:30 UTC Finished
J
Jung J / Maginley J
C
Chan Duncan / George B T
2:0
Odds
P1 1.45 64.2% BetBoom
P2 2.60 35.8% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
🎯 PropickAI prediction
Medium confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

1 Jung J / Maginley J63%

Pure model vs market (1 · Jung J / Maginley J): model 52% · market 88% Δ −36 pp model estimates below the market

1 · Jung J / Maginley J ✓ Pick63.2%
market88%
2 · Chan Duncan / George B T36.8%
market12%

Model estimate: win Jung J / Maginley J 63.2%, win Chan Duncan / George B T 36.8%. Model favourite — Jung J / Maginley J.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

1Jung J / Maginley J (odds1.44) Score 2:1 confidence 50% ✓ outcome correct
  • Dzhang Dzh./Maginli Dzh
  • — Chan D./George B
  • T
  • (tennis)
  • Model backs Dzhang Dzh./Maginli Dzh.: probability 50% vs 69% on the line (odds 1.44)
  • no edge over the line (-19 pp) — informational only.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Jung J / Maginley J - Chan Duncan / George B T July 29, 2026

Tennis math model

Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Jung J / Maginley J.

Line favourite Fonbet: Jung J / Maginley J. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 1.05 / 2 7.60
  • Glicko: Jung J / Maginley J 63.2% / Chan Duncan / George B T 36.8%

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 8.4%
1 ✓ Pick 87.9%
2 12.1%

Odds source: Fonbet. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

For reference

Line movement

How the odds changed from opening to the current line — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner 1 1.45 → 1.45
Winner 2 2.60 → 2.60

↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.

Match center
Start 29.07.2026 19:30 UTC
Coverage hard
Match center

Jung J / Maginley J - Chan Duncan / George B T

H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Bookiesapi match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Match Participants Line Movement
More needed
Form Championat, Flashscore
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Overview Championat
Post-match / PropickAI database
Score 2:0
Events 0
Statistics 0
PropickAI check: math model and Glicko-2

We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.

Option Signal Prediction / actual Rating
Glicko-2: base favourite Audit tennis is audit-only for now: surface, serve/return and market are needed Data: line, coverage home - 63.2% fact: home hit / ROI 45.0% / Brier 0.271 / LogLoss 0.459
Glicko-2: calibrated favourite Audit tennis is audit-only for now: surface, serve/return and market are needed Data: line, coverage home - 51.6% fact: home hit / ROI 45.0% / Brier 0.469 / LogLoss 0.662
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Jung J / Maginley J 64.4% 63.2% market and model agree
Chan Duncan / George B T 35.6% 36.8%
1X2: 4 Bookies

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 63.2% / 36.8% probabilities
Rating 1,500 / 1,500 Jung J / Maginley J / Chan Duncan / George B T
RD 350 / 350 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 800-2,200 / 800-2,200 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 7.60 Fonbet · no value · model 36.8%
1 1.05 Fonbet · no value · model 63.2%
Handicap
2 -0.5 2.20 Fonbet · line only
2 +0.5 1.85 Fonbet · line only
1 -0.5 1.60 Fonbet · line only
1 +0.5 1.85 Fonbet · line only
Total
Over 19.5 1.53 Fonbet · line only
Over 20.5 2.20 Fonbet · line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Open on Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Fonbet
1.85 54.1%
1.73 57.8%
1.60 62.5%
1.43 69.9%
1.25 80.0%
1.38 72.5%
1.02 98.0%
1.60 62.5%
2.35 42.6%
1.85 54.1%
2.00 50.0%
2.20 45.5%
2.60 38.5%
3.70 27.0%
2.80 35.7%
10.00 10.0%
2.20 45.5%
1.53 65.4%

Total

Outcome Fonbet
Over 19.5 1.53 65.4%
Over 20.5 2.20 45.5%
Over 21.5 10.00 10.0%
Over 22.5 1.90 52.6%
Over 23.5 1.85 54.1%
Over 24.5 2.20 45.5%
Over 25.5 2.35 42.6%
Over 26.5 1.90 52.6%
Over 27.5 1.85 54.1%
Over 28.5 1.78 56.2%
Over 29.5 1.82 55.0%
Over 30.5 1.92 52.1%
Over 31.5 1.82 55.0%
Over 32.5 1.90 52.6%
Under 19.5 2.35 42.6%
Under 20.5 1.60 62.5%
Under 21.5 1.02 98.0%
Under 22.5 1.80 55.6%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Fonbet Leon
1.44 69.4% 1.44 69.4% 1.05 95.2% 1.44 69.4%
2.60 38.5% 2.60 38.5% 7.60 13.2% 2.60 38.5%