Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles

Poling K./Pattergill K. - Lammons N / Withrow J

🎯 PropickAI prediction
High confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

2 Lammons N / Withrow J65%

Pure model vs market (2 · Lammons N / Withrow J): model 56% · market 67% Δ −11 pp model estimates below the market

1 · Poling K./Pattergill K.34.7%
market33%
2 · Lammons N / Withrow J ✓ Pick65.3%
market67%

Model estimate: win Poling K./Pattergill K. 34.7%, win Lammons N / Withrow J 65.3%. Model favourite — Lammons N / Withrow J.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

2Lammons N / Withrow J (odds1.40) Score 1:2 confidence 51%
  • Poling K./Pattergill K
  • — Lammons N./Uitrou Dzh
  • (tennis)
  • Lammons N./Uitrou Dzh.: forma PVVVV (4-1)
  • Model backs Lammons N./Uitrou Dzh.: probability 51% vs 72% on the line (odds 1.40)
  • no edge over the line (-20 pp) — informational only.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Poling K./Pattergill K. - Lammons N / Withrow J July 28, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite market consensus: Lammons N / Withrow J. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (market consensus): 1 2.80 / 2 1.40

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 7.1%
1 33.3%
2 ✓ Pick 66.7%

Odds source: market consensus. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

Head-to-head and form stats

Head-to-head and form

Team form

Poling K./Pattergill K.

no data

Lammons N / Withrow J
6-4WLWLWLWWLW
scored 1.2conceded 0.9

Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics — for reference.

Tennis ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles
ATP Challenger. Vancouver. Doubles hard 28.07.2026 15:00 UTC Not started
28.07.2026 15:00 UTC Not started
P
Poling K./Pattergill K.
L
Lammons N / Withrow J
-:-
Odds
P1 2.80 33.3% BetBoom
P2 1.40 66.7% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
Match center
Start 28.07.2026 15:00 UTC
Coverage hard
Form 3 matches
Match center

Poling K./Pattergill K. - Lammons N / Withrow J

V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.

Form 3/5 recent games
H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Form Match Participants Line Overview
More needed
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Movement Line history
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Poling K./Pattergill K. 33.7% 34.7%
Lammons N / Withrow J 66.3% 65.3% market and model agree

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 34.7% / 65.3% probabilities
Rating 1,500 / 1,757 Poling K./Pattergill K. / Lammons N / Withrow J
RD 350 / 143 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 800-2,200 / 1,471-2,043 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 1.40 market consensus · no value · model 65.3%
1 2.76 market consensus · no value · model 34.7%

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

bookmaker line and markets

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Leon
2.73 36.6% 2.75 36.4% 2.80 35.7%
1.40 71.4% 1.40 71.4% 1.39 71.9%
Match center
Poling K./Pattergill K.
L W W
23.07 12:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Doubles: Bloomfield Hills 🇺🇸, hard
Poling K./Pattergill K. 1:2 Isaro P./Kaliyanda Punacha N.
18.07 20:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Doubles: Lincoln 🇺🇸, hard
Poling K./Pattergill K. 2:0 Goldkhoff Dzh./Kharper K.
17.07 22:30 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Doubles: Lincoln 🇺🇸, hard
Poling K./Pattergill K. 2:0 Martines L.-D./Shikhi Dzh.
2 Wins
1 Losses
1.7 Sets won
0.7 Sets lost
67% Win percentage
Lammons N / Withrow J
L W W W W
23.07 12:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Doubles: Bloomfield Hills 🇺🇸, hard
Lammons N / Withrow J 1:2 Isaro P./Kaliyanda Punacha N.
18.07 20:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Doubles: Lincoln 🇺🇸, hard
Lammons N / Withrow J 2:0 Goldkhoff Dzh./Kharper K.
17.07 22:30 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Doubles: Lincoln 🇺🇸, hard
Lammons N / Withrow J 2:0 Martines L.-D./Shikhi Dzh.
16.07 22:00 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Doubles: Lincoln 🇺🇸, hard
Lammons N / Withrow J 2:0 Bertola R./Echargi M.
15.07 20:30 UTC+0 Challenger Men - Doubles: Lincoln 🇺🇸, hard
Lammons N / Withrow J 2:0 Mineni S./Suresh D.
4 Wins
1 Losses
1.8 Sets won
0.4 Sets lost
80% Win percentage