ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Rzeszow (Poland), clay
ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Rzeszow (Poland), clay
27.06.2026 07:30 UTC
Finished

ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Rzeszow (Poland), clay

Guttau N./Larvig N. - Molder M./Tamm K.

Tennis
G
Guttau N./Larvig N.
2 : 1
Finished
M
Molder M./Tamm K.
AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

2Molder M./Tamm K. (odds1.03) Score 0:2 confidence 84% ✗ outcome missed
  • Guttau N./Larvig N
  • — Molder M./Tamm K
  • (tennis)
  • Model backs Molder M./Tamm K.: probability 84%.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Guttau N./Larvig N. - Molder M./Tamm K. June 27, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite Fonbet: Molder M./Tamm K.. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 7.60 / 2 1.03
  • Total 2.5: over probability 0.0%

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 10.2%
1 11.9%
2 88.1%

Odds source: Fonbet. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

AI

Model consensus

Glavnyy konsensus AI: 2

Main outcome
Agreement 5/5
Confidence 86.2%
Total Under 2.5
Score 0:2

Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.

VALUE

Fonbet · historical ROI

Extra value signals (not 1x2)

LOW

tennis.main.total: Under 33.5

odds 1.78 hist. ROI +0.0%

Tennis Under (silnyy favorit — bystryy match)

Signals built from a May 2026 backtest: statistical windows with a stable positive ROI. Not financial advice — play responsibly.

Buy the full AI analysis

Full match breakdown: outcomes, market scenarios, form, lineups and key risks. During live you can get another, more accurate prediction accounting for the score, minute and tempo. Price: 100 RUB

Payment via YooKassa. After payment we will redirect you to a private link with the prediction.

Match center
Start 27.06.2026 07:30 UTC
Match center

Guttau N./Larvig N. - Molder M./Tamm K.

H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 4 model / bookmakers
Post-match / PropickAI database
Score 2:1
Events 0
Statistics 0
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Guttau N./Larvig N. 11.9% -
Draw 0.0% -
Molder M./Tamm K. 88.1% - market favourite
Total 2.5 Over 0.0% - Under 0.0%
Model check - - Difference 0.00
Thin market consensus Market vs Glicko gap: 0.00

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 1.03 Fonbet · line only
1 7.60 Fonbet · line only
Handicap
2 +0.5 1.62 Fonbet · line only
1 +0.5 2.15 Fonbet · line only
Total
Over 19.5 3.90 Fonbet · line only
Over 20.5 10.00 Fonbet · line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Открыть на Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Fonbet
2.15 46.5%
4.50 22.2%
6.50 15.4%
3.05 32.8%
3.90 25.6%
1.35 74.1%
1.62 61.7%
1.15 87.0%
1.06 94.3%
1.30 76.9%
1.19 84.0%
2.95 33.9%

Total

Outcome Fonbet
Over 19.5 3.90 25.6%
Over 20.5 10.00 10.0%
Over 21.5 1.90 52.6%
Over 22.5 2.55 39.2%
Over 23.5 3.95 25.3%
Over 24.5 1.80 55.6%
Over 25.5 1.90 52.6%
Over 27.5 2.10 47.6%
Over 30.5 2.30 43.5%
Over 31.5 1.63 61.4%
Over 32.5 1.75 57.1%
Over 33.5 1.92 52.1%
Under 19.5 1.20 83.3%
Under 20.5 1.02 98.0%
Under 21.5 1.80 55.6%
Under 22.5 1.45 69.0%
Under 23.5 1.19 84.0%
Under 24.5 1.90 52.6%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Fonbet
7.60 13.2%
1.03 97.1%
Match center
? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ????????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? ? ??? ????????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ??? ??????¦? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? ? ??? ????????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ??? ??????¦? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????°? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ? ? ??????? ?????????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????°? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????±? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????»? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ? ? ??????? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????° ? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??-? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????° ? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ??? ??????¦? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????µ? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ????? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? ? ????????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ? ? ??????? ?????????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??-? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ??? ??????¦? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????°.

The tournament summary is shown from SStats while the donor comparison is not collected yet.