ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Rzeszow (Poland), clay
ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Rzeszow (Poland), clay
27.06.2026 06:00 UTC
Finished

ITF Men - Doubles: M15 Rzeszow (Poland), clay

Homola P./Grazdil Ya. - Hoeyeraal H./Rivera L.

Tennis
H
Homola P./Grazdil Ya.
0 : 2
Finished
H
Hoeyeraal H./Rivera L.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Homola P./Grazdil Ya. - Hoeyeraal H./Rivera L. June 27, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite Fonbet: Homola P./Grazdil Ya.. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 1.09 / 2 5.60
  • Total 2.5: over probability 0.0%

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 9.6%
1 83.7%
2 16.3%

Odds source: Fonbet. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

AI

Model consensus

Glavnyy konsensus AI: 1

Main outcome
Agreement 5/5
Confidence 82.7%
Total Under 2.5
Score 2:0

Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.

VALUE

Fonbet · historical ROI

Extra value signals (not 1x2)

LOW

tennis.main.total: Over 21.5

odds 1.68 hist. ROI +0.0%

Tennis Over (blizkiy match — 3 sets veroyatny)

LOW

tennis.main.total: Under 36.5

odds 1.78 hist. ROI +0.0%

Tennis Under (silnyy favorit — bystryy match)

Signals built from a May 2026 backtest: statistical windows with a stable positive ROI. Not financial advice — play responsibly.

Buy the full AI analysis

Full match breakdown: outcomes, market scenarios, form, lineups and key risks. During live you can get another, more accurate prediction accounting for the score, minute and tempo. Price: 100 RUB

Payment via YooKassa. After payment we will redirect you to a private link with the prediction.

Match center
Start 27.06.2026 06:00 UTC
Match center

Homola P./Grazdil Ya. - Hoeyeraal H./Rivera L.

H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 4 model / bookmakers
Post-match / PropickAI database
Score 0:2
Events 0
Statistics 0
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Homola P./Grazdil Ya. 83.7% - market favourite
Draw 0.0% -
Hoeyeraal H./Rivera L. 16.3% -
Total 2.5 Over 0.0% - Under 0.0%
Model check - - Difference 0.00
Thin market consensus Market vs Glicko gap: 0.00

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 5.60 Fonbet · line only
1 1.09 Fonbet · line only
Handicap
2 -0.5 2.35 Fonbet · line only
2 +0.5 1.68 Fonbet · line only
1 -0.5 1.52 Fonbet · line only
1 +0.5 2.05 Fonbet · line only
Total
Over 21.5 1.68 Fonbet · line only
Over 22.5 1.78 Fonbet · line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Открыть на Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Fonbet
2.05 48.8%
1.03 97.1%
1.73 57.8%
1.67 59.9%
1.62 61.7%
1.52 65.8%
1.32 75.8%
1.09 91.7%
1.67 59.9%
1.68 59.5%
7.60 13.2%
2.00 50.0%
2.07 48.3%
2.15 46.5%
2.35 42.6%
2.95 33.9%
5.60 17.9%
2.07 48.3%

Total

Outcome Fonbet
Over 21.5 1.68 59.5%
Over 22.5 1.78 56.2%
Over 23.5 3.40 29.4%
Over 24.5 1.85 54.1%
Over 25.5 1.92 52.1%
Over 30.5 1.75 57.1%
Over 31.5 1.73 57.8%
Over 32.5 1.78 56.2%
Over 33.5 1.65 60.6%
Over 34.5 1.75 57.1%
Over 35.5 3.50 28.6%
Over 36.5 1.92 52.1%
Under 21.5 2.05 48.8%
Under 22.5 1.92 52.1%
Under 23.5 1.25 80.0%
Under 24.5 1.85 54.1%
Under 25.5 1.78 56.2%
Under 30.5 1.95 51.3%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Fonbet
1.09 91.7%
5.60 17.9%
Match center
? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ????????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? ? ??? ????????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ??? ??????¦? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? ? ??? ????????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ??? ??????¦? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????°? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ? ? ??????? ?????????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????°? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????±? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????»? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ? ? ??????? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????° ? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??-? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????° ? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ??? ??????¦? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????µ? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ????? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ??? ? ????????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ?? ? ? ??????? ?????????? ? ??? ? ? ? ???? ? ? ??? ??? ???????? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ? ??-? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ??? ? ??? ??????¦? ? ??? ? ?????? ? ? ???????? ??????°.

The tournament summary is shown from SStats while the donor comparison is not collected yet.