Nilsson L. πΈπͺ - Herrero Linana A
About the athletes
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
2 Herrero Linana A β 54%
Pure model vs market (2 Β· Herrero Linana A): model 52% Β· market 54% Ξ β2 pp model estimate matches the market
Model estimate: win Nilsson L. πΈπͺ 45.9%, win Herrero Linana A 54.1%. Model favourite β Herrero Linana A.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
- • Nilsson L
- • πΈπͺ β Errero Linyana A
- • πͺπΈ (tennis)
- • Nilsson L
- • πΈπͺ: forma P (0-1)
- • Errero Linyana A
- • πͺπΈ: forma PVVV (3-1)
- • Model backs Errero Linyana A
- • πͺπΈ: probability 54% vs 56% on the line (odds 1.79)
- • no edge over the line (-2 pp) β informational only.
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
AI match prediction Nilsson L. πΈπͺ - Herrero Linana A July 15, 2026
Tennis math modelBased on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Herrero Linana A.
- Win odds (market consensus): 1 2.03 / 2 1.72
- Glicko: Nilsson L. πΈπͺ 45.9% / Herrero Linana A 54.1%
For reference
Fair probability (no margin)
Probability excluding the bookmaker margin β for reference, not a betting recommendation.Odds source: market consensus. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds β reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
Head-to-head and form stats
Head-to-head and form
Team form
no data
Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics β for reference.
Nilsson L. πΈπͺ - Herrero Linana A
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
Match markets
Handicap
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.85 54.1% | — | 1.82 55.0% | |
| 1.85 54.1% | 1.85 54.1% | 1.80 55.6% | |
| 1.87 53.5% | — | 1.84 54.4% | |
| — | 1.85 54.1% | — | |
| 1.83 54.6% | — | 1.80 55.6% | |
| 1.85 54.1% | — | 1.82 55.0% | |
| 1.85 54.1% | 1.85 54.1% | 1.83 54.6% | |
| — | 1.85 54.1% | — |
Total
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 20.5 | 1.78 56.2% | 1.79 55.9% | 1.77 56.5% |
| Under 20.5 | 1.93 51.8% | 1.90 52.6% | 1.87 53.5% |
Outcome (1X2)
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.03 49.3% | 2.02 49.5% | 1.92 52.1% | |
| 1.70 58.8% | 1.70 58.8% | 1.72 58.1% |
Arango E. π¨π΄
Sherif Ξ. πͺπ¬
Byurel K. π«π·
Full head-to-head historyNilsson L. πΈπͺ - Herrero Linana A