| Vandewinkel H | Sieg M | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 68.3% | 53.8% |
| Hard % | 75.2% | 50.4% |
| Clay % | 64.4% | 57.4% |
| Grass % | 37.5% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 67.8% | 59.7% |
| Tie-breaks % | 53.2% | 55.8% |
| Titles (total) | 12 | 2 |
| Last 10 | LWWWWLWWLL | WWLWLWLWWW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Vandewinkel H | Sieg M | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 1.50 | 3.57 |
| Double faults per match | 2 | 3.96 |
| Breaks per match | 7.5 | 2.24 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 44.4% 4 / 9 Matches | 76.7% 23 / 30 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 47.6% 10 / 21 Matches | 76.2% 32 / 42 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 1.50 | 5.11 |
| Most Aces in a match | 50 % | 78 % |
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 57.7% 15 / 26 Matches | 28.6% 2 / 7 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 61.1% 22 / 36 Matches | 47.4% 9 / 19 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | 2.00 |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | 43 % |
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 42.9% 3 / 7 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 42.9% 3 / 7 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | 3.14 |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | 43 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Sets | 2 (66.7%) | 1 (33.3%) |
| Wins this year | 54.3% 19 / 35 Matches | 67.4% 33 / 49 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 56.1% 32 / 57 Matches | 66.2% 49 / 74 Matches |
| Current rank | 372 | 93 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $63,998 USD | $66,820 USD |
| Rating | 372 | 93 |
| Age | 23 | 22 |
| Height | — | 1.78m |
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 54 % | 67 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 54 % | 64 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 34 % | 53 % |
| Wins From Behind | 27 % | 6 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 69 % | 76 % |
| Set 1 Win | 40 % | 71 % |
| Set 2 Win | 63 % | 58 % |
| Set 3 Win | 58 % | 64 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Date | Tournament | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 13 2024 | W35 Aschaffenburg ITF Women (Clay) | Madison Sieg 2 – 1 Hanne Vandewinkel |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 8.8 | 8.96 | 8.88 |
| Over 6.5 | 94 % | 95 % | 95 % |
| Over 7.5 | 74 % | 82 % | 78 % |
| Over 8.5 | 54 % | 61 % | 58 % |
| Over 9.5 | 31 % | 34 % | 33 % |
| Over 10.5 | 9 % | 14 % | 12 % |
| Over 11.5 | 9 % | 14 % | 12 % |
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 1.50 | 3.57 | 5.07 |
| Most Aces in a match | 50 % | 57 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 100 % | 91 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 50 % | 83 % | 100 % |
| 3+ | 0 % | 57 % | 69 % |
| 4+ | 0 % | 43 % | 37 % |
| 5+ | 0 % | 26 % | 26 % |
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 7.5 | 2.24 | 9.74 |
| Over 0.5 | 100 % | 39 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 100 % | 39 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 100 % | 39 % | 70 % |
| Over 3.5 | 0 % | 39 % | 70 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 4 % | 70 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 4 % | 70 % |
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.2 |
| Over 0.5 | 23 % | 11 % | 17 % |
| Over 1.5 | 3 % | 2 % | 3 % |
| Under 0.5 | 77 % | 89 % | 17 % |
| Under 1.5 | 97 % | 98 % | 3 % |
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 2 | 3.96 | 5.96 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 100 % | 96 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 50 % | 87 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 50 % | 74 % | 100 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 0 % | 57 % | 92 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 0 % | 39 % | 62 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 0 % | 26 % | 56 % |
| Madison Sieg | Hanne Vandewinkel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | N/A | 13.33 | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | N/A | 67 % | N/A |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | N/A | 67 % | N/A |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | N/A | 67 % | N/A |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | N/A | 67 % | N/A |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | N/A | 67 % | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Vandewinkel H go head-to-head with Sieg M on August 6, 2026 in the World Tennis. Women. Landisville, International.
Full analysis — form, H2H, odds and the PrognozAI AI prediction — follows on this page.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
1 Vandewinkel H — 84%
Pure model vs market (1 · Vandewinkel H): model 60% · market 87% Δ −27 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Vandewinkel H 84.0%, win Sieg M 16.0%. Model favourite — Vandewinkel H.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 6 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Model consensus
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
AI overview
AI analysis:2/7 ready · Still preparing:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
AI consensus:1
| AI | 1 | 2 | Score | Total games | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 80% | 20% | 2:0 | Under 21.5 | |
| Claude | 84% | 16% | 2:0 | Under 22.5 |
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko84.0% · +Elo prior (weight0.40).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Baltbet | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | 1.37 73.0% | — | |
| 1.70 58.8% | 1.70 58.8% | 1.71 58.5% | |
| — | 2.30 43.5% | — | |
| — | 3.45 29.0% | — | |
| 2.03 49.3% | — | 1.94 51.6% | |
| — | 2.85 35.1% | — | |
| — | 2.02 49.5% | — | |
| — | 1.55 64.5% | — | |
| — | 1.25 80.0% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.02 98.0% | |
| 1.23 81.3% | |
| 3.55 28.2% | |
| 10.00 10.0% |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 16.5 | — | 1.50 66.7% | — |
| Over 17.5 | 1.82 55.0% | 1.82 55.0% | 1.76 56.8% |
| Over 18.5 | 2.03 49.3% | 2.20 45.5% | 1.95 51.3% |
| Over 19.5 | — | 2.60 38.5% | — |
| Under 16.5 | — | 2.40 41.7% | — |
| Under 17.5 | 1.88 53.2% | 1.88 53.2% | 1.88 53.2% |
| Under 18.5 | 1.70 58.8% | 1.60 62.5% | 1.70 58.8% |
| Under 19.5 | — | 1.43 69.9% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 4.15 24.1% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.17 85.5% |
Vandewinkel H
Tararudee L
Zakharova A
Sieg M
Rapolu M
Rayna A
Full head-to-head historyVandewinkel H - Sieg M
The Vandewinkel H - Sieg M breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.