PropickAI PropickAI
Sign in Sign up
ITF Women - Singles: W15 Monastir 22 (Tunisia), hard
ITF Women - Singles: W15 Monastir 22 (Tunisia), hard
15.07.2026 08:00 UTC Match prediction

Deppner S. 🇫🇷 - Mincheva V

Tennis ITF Women - Singles: W15 Monastir 22 (Tunisia), hard
ITF Women - Singles: W15 Monastir 22 (Tunisia), hard hard 15.07.2026 08:00 UTC Finished
15.07.2026 08:00 UTC Finished
D
Deppner S. 🇫🇷
M
Mincheva V
0:2
Odds
P1 6.40 14.7% BetBoom
P2 1.10 85.3% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
🎯 PropickAI prediction
Medium confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

2 Mincheva V — 81%

1 · Deppner S. 🇫🇷18.8%
market15%
2 · Mincheva V ✓ Прогноз81.2%
market85%

Model estimate: win Deppner S. 🇫🇷 18.8%, win Mincheva V 81.2%. Model favourite — Mincheva V.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

2Mincheva V (odds1.10) confidence 69% ✓ outcome correct

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Deppner S. 🇫🇷 - Mincheva V 15 июля 2026

Tennis math model

Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Mincheva V.

Line favourite market consensus: Mincheva V. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (market consensus): 1 6.40 / 2 1.10
  • Glicko: Deppner S. 🇫🇷 18.8% / Mincheva V 81.2%

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 6.5%
1 14.7%
2 ✓ Прогноз 85.3%

Odds source: market consensus. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

Match center
Start 15.07.2026 08:00 UTC
Coverage hard
Match center

Deppner S. 🇫🇷 - Mincheva V

H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Match Participants Line
More needed
Form Championat, Flashscore
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Movement Line history
Overview Championat
Post-match / PropickAI database
Score 0:2
Events 0
Statistics 0
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Deppner S. 🇫🇷 15.4% 18.8%
Mincheva V 84.7% 81.2% market and model agree
1X2: 3 Bookies

Glicko-2 - рейтинговая модель силы: сравнивает линию, историю и стабильность, но не дает гарантий.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 18.8% / 81.2% probabilities
Rating 1,500 / 1,500 Deppner S. 🇫🇷 / Mincheva V
RD 350 / 350 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 800-2,200 / 800-2,200 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: value не найден

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 1.08 market consensus · no value · model 81.2%
1 6.03 market consensus · no value · model 18.8%
Total
Over 18.5 1.96 market consensus · line only
Under 18.5 1.69 market consensus · line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Betcity Leon
П1 +6.5 1.88 53.2% 1.79 55.9%
П2 -6.5 1.82 55.0% 1.84 54.4%

Total

Outcome Leon
ТБ 18.5 1.96 51.0%
ТМ 18.5 1.69 59.2%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Leon
П1 6.40 15.6% 5.80 17.2% 5.90 17.0%
П2 1.08 92.6% 1.10 90.9% 1.07 93.5%