Black B A - Ekstrand M
Extended stats (scorego)
| Black B A | Ekstrand M | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 100% | 57% |
| Hard % | 100% | 56.4% |
| Clay % | 0% | 50% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 100% | 51.6% |
| Tie-breaks % | 50% | 75% |
| Titles (total) | 1 | 2 |
| Last 10 | WWWW | WWWLWLLLWW |
Source: scorego-app.com
About the athletes
Serve and return stats
| Black B A | Ekstrand M | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 4.00 | 0.00 |
| Double faults per match | 1 | 3 |
| Breaks per match | 8 | 8.5 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
TennisStats: rating, form and serve/return
Hard
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 58.8% 10 / 17 Matches | 66.7% 4 / 6 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 50.0% 10 / 20 Matches | 57.1% 12 / 21 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 4.00 | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | 100 % | N/A |
Clay
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
Grass
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | 0.00 |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | 0 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
H2H series (tennisstats)
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 55.6% 10 / 18 Matches | 57.1% 4 / 7 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 45.5% 10 / 22 Matches | 54.6% 12 / 22 Matches |
| Current rank | 936 | 827 |
Source: tennisstats.com
Profile and percentages (tennisstats)
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $2,025 USD | $3,940 USD |
| Rating | 936 | 827 |
Win percentage (match / set)
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 56 % | 57 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 56 % | 57 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 50 % | 43 % |
| Wins From Behind | 0 % | 25 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 72 % | 57 % |
| Set 1 Win | 72 % | 43 % |
| Set 2 Win | 50 % | 57 % |
| Set 3 Win | 25 % | 100 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Betting benchmarks (tennisstats)
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
Total games
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.33 | 10.29 | 9.81 |
| Over 6.5 | 89 % | 100 % | 95 % |
| Over 7.5 | 89 % | 100 % | 95 % |
| Over 8.5 | 50 % | 100 % | 75 % |
| Over 9.5 | 39 % | 71 % | 55 % |
| Over 10.5 | 28 % | 29 % | 29 % |
| Over 11.5 | 28 % | 29 % | 29 % |
Aces
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 4.00 | 0.00 | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | 100 % | 0 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 100 % | 0 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 100 % | 0 % | 100 % |
| 3+ | 100 % | 0 % | 50 % |
| 4+ | 100 % | 0 % | 50 % |
| 5+ | 0 % | 0 % | 50 % |
Breaks
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 8 | 8.5 | 16.5 |
| Over 0.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 3.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 100 % |
Tie-breaks
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.33 | 0 | 0.17 |
| Over 0.5 | 28 % | 0 % | 14 % |
| Over 1.5 | 6 % | 0 % | 3 % |
| Under 0.5 | 72 % | 100 % | 14 % |
| Under 1.5 | 94 % | 100 % | 3 % |
Double faults
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 0 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 0 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 0 % | 0 % | 50 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % |
Net points
| Monika Ekstrand | Brooke Black | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 14.5 (15+) | 0 % | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Black B A take on Ekstrand M on August 6, 2026 in the ITF Women - Singles: W35 Roehampton (Velikobritaniya), hard.
PrognozAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 54% to win. Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PrognozAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
1 Black B A — 54%
Pure model vs market (1 · Black B A): model 58% · market 48% Δ +10 pp model estimates above the market
Model estimate: win Black B A 53.8%, win Ekstrand M 46.2%. Model favourite — Black B A.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
- • Black B
- • 🇬🇧 — Ekstrand M
- • 🇺🇸 (tennis)
- • Black B
- • 🇬🇧: forma PVVPV (3-2)
- • Ekstrand M
- • 🇺🇸: forma VVVVP (4-1)
- • Model backs Black B
- • 🇬🇧: probability 58% vs 53% on the line (odds 1.87)
- • edge over the line +4 pp — value pick.
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
AI match prediction Black B A - Ekstrand M August 6, 2026
Tennis math modelBased on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Ekstrand M.
- Win odds (market consensus): 1 1.93 / 2 1.79
- Glicko: Black B A 53.8% / Ekstrand M 46.2%
For reference
Fair probability (no margin)
Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.Odds source: consensus of 3 books (Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Forecast by market
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Black B A - Ekstrand M
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko53.8% · +Elo prior (weight0.44).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
Match markets
Handicap
| Outcome | Leon |
|---|---|
| 1.87 53.5% | |
| 1.79 55.9% | |
| 1.94 51.6% | |
| 1.71 58.5% | |
| 1.77 56.5% | |
| 1.85 54.1% |
Total
| Outcome | Leon |
|---|---|
| Over 21.5 | 1.88 53.2% |
| Under 21.5 | 1.76 56.8% |
Outcome (1X2)
| Outcome | Kambi BetMGM | Kambi Unibet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.91 52.4% | 1.91 52.4% | 1.93 51.8% | |
| 1.79 55.9% | 1.79 55.9% | 1.72 58.1% |
Beyns N. 🇬🇧
Epplton E. 🇬🇧
Doden O. 🇫🇷
Ekstrand M
Klagmen Kh
Full head-to-head historyBlack B A - Ekstrand M
Match history
Unlock the full match prediction
The Black B A - Ekstrand M breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
- Full AI consensus of 7 models
- Win probabilities & value flags
- Match history & form