PropickAI PropickAI
Sign in Sign up
Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
ITF Women - Singles: W75 Koksijde (Belgium), clay
ITF Women - Singles: W75 Koksijde (Belgium), clay
04.08.2026 08:00 UTC

Urgesi F - Van Impe A. 🇧🇪

✓ Prematch ready Prematch data ✓Line ✓Form –H2H ✓Prediction

Urgesi F meet Van Impe A. 🇧🇪 on August 4, 2026 in the ITF Women - Singles: W75 Koksijde (Belgium), clay.

Read on for detailed stats, previous meetings, the bookmaker line and the PrognozAI neural-network verdict.

🎯 PropickAI prediction
Medium confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

1 Urgesi F — 58%

1 · Urgesi F ✓ Pick58.4%
market70%
2 · Van Impe A. 🇧🇪41.6%
market30%

Model estimate: win Urgesi F 58.4%, win Van Impe A. 🇧🇪 41.6%. Model favourite — Urgesi F.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

1Urgesi F (odds1.29) Score 2:1 confidence 50%
  • • Urgesi F
  • • 🇮🇹 — Van Impe A
  • • 🇧🇪 (tennis)
  • • Urgesi F
  • • 🇮🇹: forma PVVPV (3-2)
  • • Van Impe A
  • • 🇧🇪: forma PPV (1-2)
  • • Model backs Urgesi F
  • • 🇮🇹: probability 50% vs 78% on the line (odds 1.29)
  • • no edge over the line (-28 pp) — informational only.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Urgesi F - Van Impe A. 🇧🇪 August 4, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite market consensus: Urgesi F. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (market consensus): 1 1.29 / 2 3.07

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 10.1%
1 ✓ Pick 70.4%
2 29.6%

Odds source: Leon line. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

Head-to-head and form stats

Head-to-head and form

Team form

Urgesi F
6-4WWWLWLWWLL
scored 1.2conceded 1.2
Van Impe A. 🇧🇪

no data

Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics — for reference.

Tennis ITF Women - Singles: W75 Koksijde (Belgium), clay
ITF Women - Singles: W75 Koksijde (Belgium), clay clay 04.08.2026 08:00 UTC Not started
04.08.2026 08:00 UTC Not started
U
Urgesi F
V
Van Impe A. 🇧🇪
-:-
Odds
P1 1.29 70.4% BetBoom
P2 3.07 29.6% BetBoom
Coverage: clay
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
clay Coverage clay
0 H2H 0
Match center
Start 04.08.2026 08:00 UTC
Market 1 70.4% @ 1.29 / 2 29.6% @ 3.07
Coverage clay
Form 6 matches
Match center

Urgesi F - Van Impe A. 🇧🇪

V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.

Form 5/3 recent games
H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Form Match Participants Line Overview
More needed
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Movement Line history
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Urgesi F 70.4% 58.4% market and model agree
Van Impe A. 🇧🇪 29.6% 41.6%

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 58.4% / 41.6% probabilities
Rating 1,596 / 1,409 Urgesi F / Van Impe A. 🇧🇪
RD 165 / 241 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 1,267-1,926 / 928-1,890 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 3.07 market consensus · no value · model 41.6%
1 1.29 market consensus · no value · model 58.4%

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

bookmaker line and markets

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Leon
1.29 77.5%
3.07 32.6%
Match center
Urgesi F
L W W L W
30.07 08:30 UTC+0 ITF Women - Singles: W75 Hechingen (Germany), clay
Urgesi F 1:2 Palitsova B. 🇨🇿Palitsova B. 🇨🇿
29.07 11:30 UTC+0 ITF Women - Singles: W75 Hechingen (Germany), clay
Urgesi F 2:1 Martynov D. 🇫🇷
20.07 16:30 UTC+0 Challenger Women - Singles: Palermo (Italy), clay
Urgesi F 2:1 Yaneva E
15.07 12:00 UTC+0 Challenger Women - Singles: Rome (Italy), clay
Urgesi F 1:2 Dzhons F. 🇬🇧Dzhons F. 🇬🇧
14.07 16:45 UTC+0 Challenger Women - Singles: Rome (Italy), clay
Urgesi F 2:0 Kotliar Y. 🇺🇦
3 Wins
2 Losses
1.6 Sets won
1.2 Sets lost
60% Win percentage
Van Impe A. 🇧🇪
L L W
29.07 08:00 UTC+0 ITF Women - Singles: W50 Knokke-Heist (Belgium), clay
Van Impe A. 🇧🇪 1:2 Matula M. 🇬🇷
04.07 07:00 UTC+0 ITF Women - Singles: W15 Getxo (Spain), clay (indoor)
Van Impe A. 🇧🇪 1:2 Torner Sensano N. 🇪🇸
01.07 06:00 UTC+0 ITF Women - Singles: W15 Getxo (Spain), clay
Van Impe A. 🇧🇪 2:0 Trunet J. 🇫🇷
1 Wins
2 Losses
1.3 Sets won
1.3 Sets lost
33% Win percentage