Moon J./Nishimoto S. - Chen M./Van Ya.
Extended stats (scorego) — pair
| Moon J./Nishimoto S. | Chen M./Van Ya. | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 100% | 50% |
| Hard % | 100% | 50% |
| Clay % | 0% | 0% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 0% | 0% |
| Tie-breaks % | 100% | 0% |
| Titles (total) | 0 | 0 |
| Last 10 | W | LW |
Source: scorego-app.com
About the athletes
Moon J./Nishimoto S. face Chen M./Van Ya. on August 7, 2026 in the ITF Women - Doubles: W15 Tianjin (China), hard.
Recent form (W-D-L): Moon J./Nishimoto S. 2-0-0, Chen M./Van Ya. 2-0-0. Read on for detailed stats, previous meetings, the bookmaker line and the PrognozAI neural-network verdict.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
2 Chen M./Van Ya. — 52%
Model estimate: win Moon J./Nishimoto S. 48.4%, win Chen M./Van Ya. 51.6%. Model favourite — Chen M./Van Ya..
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
- • Moon J./Nishimoto S
- • — Chen M./Van Ya
- • (tennis)
- • Moon J./Nishimoto S.: forma VV (2-0)
- • Chen M./Van Ya.: forma VV (2-0)
- • Model backs Chen M./Van Ya.: probability 52% vs 61% on the line (odds 1.63)
- • no edge over the line (-10 pp) — informational only.
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
AI match prediction Moon J./Nishimoto S. - Chen M./Van Ya. August 7, 2026
Tennis math modelThe summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
- Win odds (market consensus): 1 2.05 / 2 1.63
For reference
Fair probability (no margin)
Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.Odds source: Leon line. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
Moon J./Nishimoto S. - Chen M./Van Ya.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
Match markets
Outcome (1X2)
| Outcome | Leon |
|---|---|
| 2.05 48.8% | |
| 1.63 61.4% |
Full head-to-head historyMoon J./Nishimoto S. - Chen M./Van Ya.
Match history
Unlock the full match prediction
The Moon J./Nishimoto S. - Chen M./Van Ya. breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
- Full AI consensus of 7 models
- Win probabilities & value flags
- Match history & form