AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Tarvet O. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Broom C | Tarvet, Oliver | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 59.9% | 75.4% |
| Hard % | 62.8% | 77% |
| Clay % | 33.3% | 0% |
| Grass % | 50% | 64.3% |
| Deciding set % | 51.6% | 73.1% |
| Tie-breaks % | 50% | 61.5% |
| Titles (total) | 8 | 8 |
| Last 10 | WWWLWWWWWW | WWWWWWWWLW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Broom C | Tarvet O | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 5.71 | 6.77 |
| Double faults per match | 2 | 2.08 |
| Breaks per match | 2.86 | 10 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 73.1% 38 / 52 Matches | 94.4% 17 / 18 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 72.2% 57 / 79 Matches | 75.0% 21 / 28 Matches |
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 55.6% 5 / 9 Matches | 40.0% 2 / 5 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 55.6% 5 / 9 Matches | 40.0% 2 / 5 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 1 (50.0%) | 1 (50.0%) |
| Sets | 3 (60.0%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| Wins this year | 68.3% 43 / 63 Matches | 81.5% 22 / 27 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 68.9% 62 / 90 Matches | 70.3% 26 / 37 Matches |
| Current rank | 258 | 329 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $286,390 USD | $12,518 USD |
| Rating | 258 | 329 |
| Age | 28 | 22 |
| Height | 1.78m | 1.83m |
| Weight | 82kg | 86kg |
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 68 % | 81 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 68 % | 83 % |
| Match Wins (5 Sets) | N/A | 100 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 52 % | 63 % |
| Wins From Behind | 20 % | 0 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 83 % | 93 % |
| Set 1 Win | 68 % | 85 % |
| Set 2 Win | 67 % | 67 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Date | Tournament | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 20 2026 | Roehampton Chall. Men (Hard) | Charles Broom 1 – 2 Oliver Tarvet |
| Aug 9 2026 | M25 Roehampton ITF Men (Hard) | Charles Broom 2 – 0 Oliver Tarvet |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.43 | 9.7 | 9.57 |
| Over 6.5 | 97 % | 100 % | 99 % |
| Over 7.5 | 89 % | 87 % | 88 % |
| Over 8.5 | 68 % | 65 % | 67 % |
| Over 9.5 | 41 % | 39 % | 40 % |
| Over 10.5 | 19 % | 13 % | 16 % |
| Over 11.5 | 19 % | 13 % | 16 % |
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 5.71 | 6.77 | 12.48 |
| Most Aces in a match | 45 % | 69 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 87 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 79 % | 100 % | 99 % |
| 3+ | 66 % | 92 % | 98 % |
| 4+ | 58 % | 77 % | 88 % |
| 5+ | 50 % | 77 % | 82 % |
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 2.86 | 10 | 12.86 |
| Over 0.5 | 95 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 92 % | 100 % | 98 % |
| Over 2.5 | 21 % | 100 % | 96 % |
| Over 3.5 | 5 % | 100 % | 95 % |
| Over 4.5 | 3 % | 100 % | 87 % |
| Over 5.5 | 3 % | 100 % | 87 % |
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.33 | 0.22 | 0.28 |
| Over 0.5 | 27 % | 17 % | 22 % |
| Over 1.5 | 5 % | 4 % | 5 % |
| Under 0.5 | 73 % | 83 % | 22 % |
| Under 1.5 | 95 % | 96 % | 5 % |
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 2 | 2.08 | 4.08 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 74 % | 77 % | 99 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 53 % | 77 % | 91 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 34 % | 46 % | 84 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 24 % | 8 % | 67 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 8 % | 0 % | 44 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 5 % | 0 % | 34 % |
| Charles Broom | Oliver Tarvet | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 8.07 | N/A | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 73 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 67 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 33 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 27 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 20 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 20 % | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Broom C take on Tarvet O on August 28, 2026 in the Rokhempton 2, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Broom C 4-0-1, Tarvet O 5-0-0. These sides have met 1 time recently — the head-to-head record is shown below. Full analysis — form, H2H, odds and the PropickAI AI prediction — follows on this page.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Tarvet O — 63%
Model estimate: win Broom C 37.1%, win Tarvet O 62.9%. Model favourite — Tarvet O.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 4 books (Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Get the 7-AI consensus, math-model probabilities, value picks and full reports for every match with Full Access.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko37.1% · +Elo prior (weight0.16).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| 2.10 47.6% | — | |
| 1.95 51.3% | — | |
| 1.80 55.6% | 1.97 50.8% | |
| 1.72 58.1% | 1.90 52.6% | |
| 1.50 66.7% | — | |
| 1.65 60.6% | — | |
| 1.75 57.1% | — | |
| 1.90 52.6% | — | |
| 2.00 50.0% | — | |
| 2.40 41.7% | — | |
| — | 1.78 56.2% | |
| — | 1.84 54.4% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.50 66.7% | |
| 3.85 26.0% | |
| 1.25 80.0% | |
| 2.55 39.2% |
| Outcome | Fonbet | Kambi BetMGM |
|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | — | 2.35 42.6% |
| Over 8.5 | — | 1.27 78.7% |
| Over 9.5 | — | 1.83 54.6% |
| Over 10.5 | — | 3.25 30.8% |
| Over 21.5 | 1.68 59.5% | 1.70 58.8% |
| Over 22.5 | 1.97 50.8% | 1.95 51.3% |
| Over 23.5 | 2.10 47.6% | 2.17 46.1% |
| Over 24.5 | 2.15 46.5% | — |
| Under 2.5 | — | 1.55 64.5% |
| Under 10.5 | — | 1.30 76.9% |
| Under 21.5 | 2.05 48.8% | 2.05 48.8% |
| Under 22.5 | 1.83 54.6% | — |
| Under 23.5 | 1.65 60.6% | — |
| Under 24.5 | 1.63 61.4% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 2.35 42.6% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.60 62.5% |
Broom C
Tarvet O
The Broom C - Tarvet O breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Tarvet O. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
Live odds for Broom C vs Tarvet O from multiple bookmakers are listed on this page and refresh as the market moves.
August 28, 2026.