| Nagel A | Van der Meerschen M | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 64.1% | 0% |
| Hard % | 67.9% | 0% |
| Clay % | 60.4% | 0% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 60.3% | 0% |
| Tie-breaks % | 51.1% | 0% |
| Titles (total) | 2 | 0 |
| Last 10 | WLWWWLWWWW | L |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Nagel A | Van der Meerschen M | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 2.50 | 4.40 |
| Double faults per match | 2 | 2.8 |
| Breaks per match | 8.5 | 3.1 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | 60.0% 12 / 20 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | 68.8% 33 / 48 Matches |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 64.7% 11 / 17 Matches | 64.0% 16 / 25 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 59.0% 23 / 39 Matches | 63.6% 21 / 33 Matches |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 60.9% 14 / 23 Matches | 61.7% 29 / 47 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 57.8% 26 / 45 Matches | 66.3% 55 / 83 Matches |
| Current rank | 694 | 400 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $11,045 USD | $11,630 USD |
| Rating | 694 | 400 |
| Age | 26 | 23 |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 61 % | 62 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 58 % | 62 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 39 % | 43 % |
| Wins From Behind | 36 % | 23 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 74 % | 79 % |
| Set 1 Win | 43 % | 66 % |
| Set 2 Win | 70 % | 55 % |
| Set 3 Win | 63 % | 56 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.61 | 9.17 | 9.39 |
| Over 6.5 | 95 % | 91 % | 93 % |
| Over 7.5 | 84 % | 78 % | 81 % |
| Over 8.5 | 58 % | 60 % | 59 % |
| Over 9.5 | 42 % | 42 % | 42 % |
| Over 10.5 | 37 % | 20 % | 29 % |
| Over 11.5 | 37 % | 20 % | 29 % |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 2.50 | 4.40 | 6.90 |
| Most Aces in a match | 50 % | 20 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| 3+ | 50 % | 60 % | 100 % |
| 4+ | 0 % | 60 % | 100 % |
| 5+ | 0 % | 60 % | 75 % |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 8.5 | 3.1 | 11.6 |
| Over 0.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 100 % | 80 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 100 % | 20 % | 100 % |
| Over 3.5 | 100 % | 0 % | 100 % |
| Over 4.5 | 100 % | 0 % | 100 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 80 % |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.28 |
| Over 0.5 | 32 % | 18 % | 25 % |
| Over 1.5 | 0 % | 7 % | 3 % |
| Under 0.5 | 68 % | 82 % | 25 % |
| Under 1.5 | 100 % | 93 % | 3 % |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 2 | 2.8 | 4.8 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 50 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 50 % | 100 % | 75 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 50 % | 60 % | 75 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 50 % | 20 % | 75 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 0 % | 0 % | 40 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 0 % | 0 % | 30 % |
| Martin Van Der Meerschen | Arthur Nagel | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | N/A | 8.5 | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | N/A | 80 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | N/A | 80 % | N/A |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Nagel A meet Van der Meerschen M on August 7, 2026 in the World Tennis. Men. Belgium. Doubles, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Nagel A 1-0-0, Van der Meerschen M 2-0-0. Scroll down for team stats, head-to-head record, odds and the PrognozAI AI pick.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
1 Nagel A — 62%
Pure model vs market (1 · Nagel A): model 56% · market 59% Δ −3 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Nagel A 61.7%, win Van der Meerschen M 38.3%. Model favourite — Nagel A.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 4 books (Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko61.7% · +Elo prior (weight0.39).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60 62.5% | — | |
| 1.68 59.5% | — | |
| 1.80 55.6% | 1.78 56.2% | |
| 2.02 49.5% | 1.84 54.4% | |
| 2.25 44.4% | — | |
| — | 1.86 53.8% | |
| — | 1.79 55.9% | |
| 2.20 45.5% | — | |
| 2.05 48.8% | — | |
| 1.90 52.6% | — | |
| 1.70 58.8% | — | |
| 1.58 63.3% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.23 81.3% | |
| 2.35 42.6% | |
| 1.52 65.8% | |
| 3.55 28.2% |
| Outcome | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| Over 20.5 | 1.70 58.8% | — |
| Over 21.5 | 1.88 53.2% | 1.84 54.4% |
| Over 22.5 | 2.13 47.0% | — |
| Over 23.5 | 2.35 42.6% | — |
| Under 20.5 | 2.02 49.5% | — |
| Under 21.5 | 1.82 55.0% | 1.80 55.6% |
| Under 22.5 | 1.63 61.4% | — |
| Under 23.5 | 1.53 65.4% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 2.40 41.7% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.50 66.7% |
Nagel A
Van der Meerschen M
Full head-to-head historyNagel A - Van der Meerschen M
The Nagel A - Van der Meerschen M breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.