| Schlagenhauf N | Forger A | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 60.2% | 55.3% |
| Hard % | 20% | 61.2% |
| Clay % | 62% | 50.7% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 52% | 43.9% |
| Tie-breaks % | 30% | 44.8% |
| Titles (total) | 0 | 0 |
| Last 10 | WLWLWLWWWL | WLWWLWWLWW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 66.7% 10 / 15 Matches |
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 60.0% 3 / 5 Matches | 60.0% 6 / 10 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 60.0% 3 / 5 Matches | 47.1% 8 / 17 Matches |
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 60.0% 3 / 5 Matches | 60.0% 6 / 10 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 60.0% 3 / 5 Matches | 56.3% 18 / 32 Matches |
| Current rank | 1382 | 811 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $5,928 USD | $7,693 USD |
| Rating | 1382 | 811 |
| Age | 23 | 21 |
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 60 % | 60 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 60 % | 60 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 40 % | 30 % |
| Wins From Behind | 0 % | 33 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 100 % | 90 % |
| Set 1 Win | 100 % | 50 % |
| Set 2 Win | 40 % | 70 % |
| Set 3 Win | 33 % | 50 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.4 | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| Over 6.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 7.5 | 80 % | 90 % | 85 % |
| Over 8.5 | 60 % | 70 % | 65 % |
| Over 9.5 | 40 % | 40 % | 40 % |
| Over 10.5 | 20 % | 20 % | 20 % |
| Over 11.5 | 20 % | 20 % | 20 % |
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Over 0.5 | 60 % | 30 % | 45 % |
| Over 1.5 | 0 % | 10 % | 5 % |
| Under 0.5 | 40 % | 70 % | 45 % |
| Under 1.5 | 100 % | 90 % | 5 % |
| Noah Schlagenhauf | Abel Forger | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 11.5 (12+) | 0 % | 0 % | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Schlagenhauf N go head-to-head with Forger A on August 7, 2026 in the World Tennis. Men. Belgium. Doubles, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Schlagenhauf N 1-0-0, Forger A 1-0-0. Full analysis — form, H2H, odds and the PrognozAI AI prediction — follows on this page.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Forger A — 70%
Model estimate: win Schlagenhauf N 29.6%, win Forger A 70.4%. Model favourite — Forger A.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 6 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko29.6% · +Elo prior (weight0.41).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 2.30 43.5% | — | |
| 1.84 54.4% | 1.82 55.0% | 1.85 54.1% | 1.86 53.8% | |
| — | — | 1.53 65.4% | — | |
| — | — | 1.55 64.5% | — | |
| — | — | 1.85 54.1% | — | |
| — | — | 2.35 42.6% | — | |
| 1.84 54.4% | 1.90 52.6% | — | 1.77 56.5% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.93 51.8% | |
| 5.70 17.5% | |
| 1.09 91.7% | |
| 1.77 56.5% |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 19.5 | — | — | 1.60 62.5% | — |
| Over 20.5 | 1.79 55.9% | 1.85 54.1% | 1.80 55.6% | 1.82 55.0% |
| Over 21.5 | — | — | 2.02 49.5% | — |
| Under 19.5 | — | — | 2.20 45.5% | — |
| Under 20.5 | 1.89 52.9% | 1.85 54.1% | 1.90 52.6% | 1.82 55.0% |
| Under 21.5 | — | — | 1.70 58.8% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 2.60 38.5% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.45 69.0% |
Schlagenhauf N
Forger A
Full head-to-head historySchlagenhauf N - Forger A
The Schlagenhauf N - Forger A breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.