| Pleshivtsev E. (World) | Tabata R | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 49.2% | 50% |
| Hard % | 53.2% | 45.7% |
| Clay % | 33.3% | 64.3% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 33.3% | 55% |
| Tie-breaks % | 31.2% | 80% |
| Titles (total) | 0 | 0 |
| Last 10 | WLWLWLLWLW | WLWWWLWWLW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Pleshivtsev E. (World) | Tabata R. π―π΅ | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | N/A | 4.80 |
| Double faults per match | N/A | 3.6 |
| Breaks per match | N/A | 17 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 47.8% 11 / 23 Matches | 58.8% 10 / 17 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 48.5% 16 / 33 Matches | 48.0% 12 / 25 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | 4.80 |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | 0 % |
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 50.0% 2 / 4 Matches | 60.0% 6 / 10 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 44.4% 4 / 9 Matches | 60.0% 6 / 10 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 66.7% 2 / 3 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 66.7% 2 / 3 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Sets | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Wins this year | 51.6% 16 / 31 Matches | 57.6% 19 / 33 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 50.0% 23 / 46 Matches | 51.2% 21 / 41 Matches |
| Current rank | 918 | 992 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $0 USD | $0 USD |
| Rating | 918 | 992 |
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 52 % | 58 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 48 % | 60 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 39 % | 36 % |
| Wins From Behind | 17 % | 28 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 65 % | 73 % |
| Set 1 Win | 55 % | 52 % |
| Set 2 Win | 48 % | 58 % |
| Set 3 Win | 50 % | 64 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Date | Tournament | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 18 2025 | Australian Open Boys (Hard) | Egor Pleshivtsev 2 – 0 Ryo Tabata |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.71 | 9.33 | 9.52 |
| Over 6.5 | 96 % | 93 % | 95 % |
| Over 7.5 | 89 % | 80 % | 85 % |
| Over 8.5 | 67 % | 63 % | 65 % |
| Over 9.5 | 44 % | 43 % | 44 % |
| Over 10.5 | 22 % | 27 % | 25 % |
| Over 11.5 | 22 % | 27 % | 25 % |
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | N/A | 4.80 | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | 0 % | N/A |
| 1+ | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| 2+ | N/A | 80 % | N/A |
| 3+ | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| 4+ | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| 5+ | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | N/A | 17 | N/A |
| Over 0.5 | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 1.5 | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 2.5 | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 3.5 | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 4.5 | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.3 | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Over 0.5 | 30 % | 30 % | 30 % |
| Over 1.5 | 0 % | 3 % | 2 % |
| Under 0.5 | 70 % | 70 % | 30 % |
| Under 1.5 | 100 % | 97 % | 2 % |
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | N/A | 3.6 | N/A |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | N/A | 60 % | N/A |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | N/A | 60 % | N/A |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
| Egor Pleshivtsev | Ryo Tabata | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | N/A | 10.8 | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | N/A | 100 % | N/A |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | N/A | 80 % | N/A |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | N/A | 60 % | N/A |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | N/A | 60 % | N/A |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | N/A | 40 % | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Pleshivtsev E. (World) meet Tabata R. π―π΅ on August 7, 2026 in the ITF Men - Singles: M15 Astana 2 (Kazakhstan), hard.
Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PrognozAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
2 Tabata R. π―π΅ β 52%
Pure model vs market (2 Β· Tabata R. π―π΅): model 45% Β· market 53% Ξ β8 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Pleshivtsev E. (World) 48.2%, win Tabata R. π―π΅ 51.8%. Model favourite β Tabata R. π―π΅.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 3 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds β reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Head-to-head and form stats
no data
Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics β for reference.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko48.2% Β· +Elo prior (weight0.51).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.90 52.6% | — | 1.87 53.5% | |
| — | 1.77 56.5% | — | |
| 1.80 55.6% | — | 1.77 56.5% | |
| — | 1.94 51.6% | — |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 21.5 | 1.77 56.5% | 1.79 55.9% | 1.75 57.1% |
| Under 21.5 | 1.94 51.6% | 1.90 52.6% | 1.89 52.9% |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.95 51.3% | 1.96 51.0% | 1.89 52.9% | |
| 1.76 56.8% | 1.75 57.1% | 1.75 57.1% |
Pleshivtsev E. (World)
Tabata R. π―π΅
Ianin N. (World)
Full head-to-head historyPleshivtsev E. (World) - Tabata R. π―π΅
The Pleshivtsev E. (World) - Tabata R. π―π΅ breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.