| Makk P | Hipfl N | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 69.4% | 52.4% |
| Hard % | 72.1% | 42.9% |
| Clay % | 63.3% | 50% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 63% | 40% |
| Tie-breaks % | 40% | 43.5% |
| Titles (total) | 4 | 0 |
| Last 10 | WLWWLWLWLW | WLWLLLWWLW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Makk P | Hipfl N | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 5.50 | 2.00 |
| Double faults per match | 3 | 2 |
| Breaks per match | 5.1 | 9 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 72.2% 13 / 18 Matches | 63.6% 7 / 11 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 64.1% 25 / 39 Matches | 63.6% 7 / 11 Matches |
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 66.7% 14 / 21 Matches | 53.3% 8 / 15 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 63.6% 14 / 22 Matches | 45.0% 9 / 20 Matches |
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Sets | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Wins this year | 69.8% 30 / 43 Matches | 55.6% 15 / 27 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 65.2% 43 / 66 Matches | 50.0% 16 / 32 Matches |
| Current rank | 546 | 913 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $4,757 USD | $3,988 USD |
| Rating | 546 | 913 |
| Age | 24 | 20 |
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 70 % | 56 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 69 % | 58 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 49 % | 44 % |
| Wins From Behind | 24 % | 14 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 86 % | 67 % |
| Set 1 Win | 70 % | 52 % |
| Set 2 Win | 65 % | 59 % |
| Set 3 Win | 56 % | 50 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Date | Tournament | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 29 2026 | M15 Sharm ElSheikh ITF Men (Hard) | Peter Makk 2 – 0 Nico Hipfl |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 8.81 | 9.19 | 9 |
| Over 6.5 | 97 % | 92 % | 95 % |
| Over 7.5 | 82 % | 81 % | 82 % |
| Over 8.5 | 54 % | 69 % | 62 % |
| Over 9.5 | 23 % | 35 % | 29 % |
| Over 10.5 | 10 % | 12 % | 11 % |
| Over 11.5 | 10 % | 12 % | 11 % |
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 5.50 | 2.00 | 7.50 |
| Most Aces in a match | 50 % | 0 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 90 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 80 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| 3+ | 80 % | 0 % | 95 % |
| 4+ | 60 % | 0 % | 95 % |
| 5+ | 40 % | 0 % | 95 % |
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 5.1 | 9 | 14.1 |
| Over 0.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 3.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 4.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 5.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.22 |
| Over 0.5 | 15 % | 27 % | 21 % |
| Over 1.5 | 3 % | 0 % | 1 % |
| Under 0.5 | 85 % | 73 % | 21 % |
| Under 1.5 | 97 % | 100 % | 1 % |
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 90 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 60 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 60 % | 0 % | 90 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 40 % | 0 % | 90 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 20 % | 0 % | 35 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 20 % | 0 % | 25 % |
| Peter Makk | Nico Hipfl | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 9.33 | N/A | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 67 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 67 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 33 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 33 % | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Makk P go head-to-head with Hipfl N on August 7, 2026 in the World Tennis. Men. Slovakia, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Makk P 2-0-0, Hipfl N 2-0-0. Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PrognozAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
1 Makk P — 64%
Pure model vs market (1 · Makk P): model 52% · market 65% Δ −13 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Makk P 63.8%, win Hipfl N 36.2%. Model favourite — Makk P.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 5 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Model consensus
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
AI overview
AI analysis:2/7 ready · Still preparing:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
AI consensus:1
| AI | 1 | 2 | Score | Total games | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 70% | 30% | 2:0 | Under 21.5 | Win Makka P. so schetom 2:0 po setam |
| Claude | 66% | 34% | 2:0 | Over 21.5 |
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko63.8% · +Elo prior (weight0.50).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Fonbet | Kambi BetMGM | Kambi Unibet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.42 70.4% | 1.40 71.4% | 1.42 70.4% | 1.44 69.4% | 1.44 69.4% | |
| 2.65 37.7% | 2.70 37.0% | 2.65 37.7% | 2.60 38.5% | 2.60 38.5% |
Makk P
Hipfl N
Full head-to-head historyMakk P - Hipfl N
The Makk P - Hipfl N breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.