| Hennemann C W | Encheva L | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 65.5% | 69.2% |
| Hard % | 68.6% | 75% |
| Clay % | 65.5% | 67.6% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 62.1% | 77.3% |
| Tie-breaks % | 50% | 52.9% |
| Titles (total) | 9 | 3 |
| Last 10 | WLWLLLWLWW | WLWWWLWWLW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Hennemann C W | Encheva L | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 0.22 | N/A |
| Double faults per match | 1.78 | N/A |
| Breaks per match | 8 | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | 77.8% 14 / 18 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 71.4% 5 / 7 Matches | 77.8% 14 / 18 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 55.6% 10 / 18 Matches | 61.5% 8 / 13 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 70.0% 28 / 40 Matches | 63.3% 19 / 30 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 0.22 | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | 0 % | N/A |
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 1 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Sets | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Wins this year | 55.6% 15 / 27 Matches | 71.0% 22 / 31 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 70.4% 38 / 54 Matches | 68.8% 33 / 48 Matches |
| Current rank | 267 | 456 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $71,587 USD | $7,551 USD |
| Rating | 267 | 456 |
| Age | 25 | — |
| Height | 1.67m | — |
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 56 % | 71 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 50 % | 71 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 30 % | 42 % |
| Wins From Behind | 20 % | 43 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 74 % | 77 % |
| Set 1 Win | 59 % | 58 % |
| Set 2 Win | 42 % | 63 % |
| Set 3 Win | 58 % | 90 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Date | Tournament | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 20 2025 | W15 Kursumlijska Banja 11 ITF Women (Clay) | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann 2 – 0 Lidia Encheva |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 8.93 | 9.1 | 9.02 |
| Over 6.5 | 100 % | 90 % | 95 % |
| Over 7.5 | 80 % | 81 % | 81 % |
| Over 8.5 | 70 % | 58 % | 64 % |
| Over 9.5 | 30 % | 35 % | 33 % |
| Over 10.5 | 15 % | 23 % | 19 % |
| Over 11.5 | 15 % | 23 % | 19 % |
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 0.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | 0 % | N/A | N/A |
| 1+ | 11 % | N/A | N/A |
| 2+ | 11 % | N/A | N/A |
| 3+ | 0 % | N/A | N/A |
| 4+ | 0 % | N/A | N/A |
| 5+ | 0 % | N/A | N/A |
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 8 | N/A | N/A |
| Over 0.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 1.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 2.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 3.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 4.5 | 33 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 5.5 | 33 % | N/A | N/A |
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.25 | 0.1 | 0.17 |
| Over 0.5 | 20 % | 6 % | 13 % |
| Over 1.5 | 5 % | 3 % | 4 % |
| Under 0.5 | 80 % | 94 % | 13 % |
| Under 1.5 | 95 % | 97 % | 4 % |
| Caijsa Wilda Hennemann | Lidia Encheva | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 1.78 | N/A | N/A |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 89 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 56 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 33 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 0 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 0 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 0 % | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Hennemann C W take on Encheva L on August 6, 2026 in the World Tennis. Women. Leipzig. Doubles, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Hennemann C W 1-0-0, Encheva L 1-0-0. Full analysis — form, H2H, odds and the PrognozAI AI prediction — follows on this page.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
1 Hennemann C W — 67%
Pure model vs market (1 · Hennemann C W): model 42% · market 70% Δ −28 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Hennemann C W 67.0%, win Encheva L 33.0%. Model favourite — Hennemann C W.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 6 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Model consensus
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
AI overview
AI analysis:2/7 ready · Still preparing:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
AI consensus:1
| AI | 1 | 2 | Score | Total games | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 72% | 28% | 2:0 | TM 20.5 | P1 |
| Claude | 65% | 35% | 2:0 | Over 20.5 | Over 20.5 games |
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko67.0% · +Elo prior (weight0.56).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 1.62 61.7% | — | |
| 1.88 53.2% | 1.90 52.6% | 1.88 53.2% | 1.85 54.1% | |
| — | — | 2.30 43.5% | — | |
| 1.82 55.0% | 1.80 55.6% | — | 1.79 55.9% | |
| — | — | 2.15 46.5% | — | |
| — | — | 1.82 55.0% | — | |
| — | — | 1.55 64.5% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.13 88.5% | |
| 1.88 53.2% | |
| 1.82 55.0% | |
| 4.70 21.3% |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 19.5 | 1.76 56.8% | 1.75 57.1% | 1.68 59.5% | 1.73 57.8% |
| Over 20.5 | 1.90 52.6% | 1.90 52.6% | 1.90 52.6% | 1.87 53.5% |
| Over 21.5 | — | — | 2.10 47.6% | — |
| Under 19.5 | 1.95 51.3% | 1.96 51.0% | 2.05 48.8% | 1.91 52.4% |
| Under 20.5 | 1.80 55.6% | 1.80 55.6% | 1.80 55.6% | 1.77 56.5% |
| Under 21.5 | — | — | 1.65 60.6% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 2.60 38.5% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.43 69.9% |
Hennemann C W
Encheva L
Full head-to-head historyHennemann C W - Encheva L
The Hennemann C W - Encheva L breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.