Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
WTA - Singles: Toronto (Canada), hard
WTA - Singles: Toronto (Canada), hard

Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ - Golubic V

Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ meet Golubic V on August 2, 2026 in the WTA - Singles: Toronto (Canada), hard.

Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PrognozAI AI breakdown.

๐ŸŽฏ PropickAI prediction

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

1 Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ โ€” 50%

Pure model vs market (1 ยท Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ): model 49% ยท market 51% ฮ” โˆ’2 pp model estimate matches the market

1 ยท Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ50.2%
2 ยท Golubic V49.8%

Model estimate: win Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 50.2%, win Golubic V 49.8%. Model favourite โ€” Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

1Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ (odds1.88) Score 2:1 confidence 50%
  • Birrell K
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ โ€” Golubich V
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ (tennis)
  • Golubich V
  • ๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ: forma PPVVP (2-3)
  • Model backs Birrell K
  • ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ: probability 50% vs 53% on the line (odds 1.88)
  • no edge over the line (-3 pp) โ€” informational only.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ - Golubic V August 2, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite market consensus: Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (market consensus): 1 1.88 / 2 1.92

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin โ€” for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 5.3%
1 50.5%
2 49.5%

Odds source: market consensus. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds โ€” reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

Head-to-head and form stats

Head-to-head and form

Team form

Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ

no data

Golubic V
7-3LWLWWWWWLW
scored 1.4conceded 1.1

Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics โ€” for reference.

Tennis WTA - Singles: Toronto (Canada), hard
WTA - Singles: Toronto (Canada), hard hard 02.08.2026 14:00 UTC Not started
02.08.2026 14:00 UTC Not started
B
Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ
Golubic V
Golubic V
-:-
Odds
P1 1.88 50.5% BetBoom
P2 1.92 49.5% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
Match center
Start 02.08.2026 14:00 UTC
Market 1 50.5% @ 1.88 / 2 49.5% @ 1.92
Coverage hard
Form 3 matches
Match center

Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ - Golubic V

V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.

Form 3/5 recent games
H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Form Match Participants Line Overview
More needed
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Movement Line history
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 50.3% 50.2% market and model agree
Golubic V 49.7% 49.8%

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 50.2% / 49.8% probabilities
Rating 1,500 / 1,595 Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ / Golubic V
RD 350 / 170 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 800-2,200 / 1,255-1,936 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 1.91 market consensus ยท no value ยท model 49.8%
1 1.88 market consensus ยท no value ยท model 50.2%
Handicap
2 +0.5 1.86 market consensus ยท line only
1 -0.5 1.92 market consensus ยท line only
Total
Over 21.5 1.82 market consensus ยท line only
Over 22.5 2.01 market consensus ยท line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Baltbet Leon
1.91 52.4% 1.93 51.8%
1.87 53.5% 1.84 54.4%

Total

Outcome Baltbet Leon
Over 21.5 1.82 55.0%
Over 22.5 2.01 49.8%
Under 21.5 1.97 50.8%
Under 22.5 1.78 56.2%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Leon
1.88 53.2% 1.88 53.2%
1.92 52.1% 1.89 52.9%
Match center
Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ
L L W
27.07 13:00 UTC+0 WTA - Singles: Memphis ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, hard
Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 1:2 Volynets K. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVolynets K. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
02.07 16:25 UTC+0 WTA - Singles: Uimbldon (Velikobritaniya), grass
Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 0:2 Paolini Ya. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡นPaolini Ya. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น
30.06 10:00 UTC+0 WTA - Singles: Uimbldon (Velikobritaniya), grass
Birrell K. ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ 2:1 Shimanovich I. (World)Shimanovich I. (World)
1 Wins
2 Losses
1.0 Sets won
1.7 Sets lost
33% Win percentage
Golubic V
L L W W L
27.07 13:00 UTC+0 WTA - Singles: Memphis ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ, hard
Golubic V 1:2 Volynets K. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธVolynets K. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
02.07 16:25 UTC+0 WTA - Singles: Uimbldon (Velikobritaniya), grass
Golubic V 0:2 Paolini Ya. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡นPaolini Ya. ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น
30.06 10:00 UTC+0 WTA - Singles: Uimbldon (Velikobritaniya), grass
Golubic V 2:1 Shimanovich I. (World)Shimanovich I. (World)
14.06 10:30 UTC+0 WTA - Singles: Nottingem (Velikobritaniya) - Qualifying, grass
Golubic V 2:0 Kenin S. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธKenin S. ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
13.06 14:40 UTC+0 WTA - Singles: Nottingem (Velikobritaniya) - Qualifying, grass
Golubic V 0:2 Eryavets V. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎEryavets V. ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฎ
2 Wins
3 Losses
1.0 Sets won
1.4 Sets lost
40% Win percentage