PropickAI PropickAI
Sign in Sign up
Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
WTA. Memphis. Doubles
WTA. Memphis. Doubles
27.07.2026 21:30 UTC Match prediction

Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R - Frey A / Stephens S

Tennis WTA. Memphis. Doubles
WTA. Memphis. Doubles hard 27.07.2026 21:30 UTC Finished
27.07.2026 21:30 UTC Finished
S
Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R
F
Frey A / Stephens S
2:0
Odds
P1 1.16 80.5% BetBoom
P2 4.80 19.5% BetBoom
Coverage: hard
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
hard Coverage hard
0 H2H 0
🎯 PropickAI prediction
Medium confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

1 Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R — 77%

Pure model vs market (1 · Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R): model 52% · market 85% Δ −33 pp model estimates below the market

1 · Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R ✓ Pick77.3%
market85%
2 · Frey A / Stephens S22.7%
market15%

Model estimate: win Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R 77.3%, win Frey A / Stephens S 22.7%. Model favourite — Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

AI agent prediction

Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)

1Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R (odds1.35) Score 2:1 confidence 68% ✓ outcome correct
  • • Starodubtseva Yu./Sarasua R
  • • — Frey A./Stivens S
  • • (tennis)
  • • Model backs Starodubtseva Yu./Sarasua R.: probability 68% vs 74% on the line (odds 1.35)
  • • no edge over the line (-6 pp) — informational only.

Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R - Frey A / Stephens S July 27, 2026

Tennis math model

Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R.

Line favourite Fonbet: Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 1.09 / 2 6.20
  • Glicko: Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R 77.3% / Frey A / Stephens S 22.7%

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 7.9%
1 ✓ Pick 85.0%
2 15.0%

Odds source: Fonbet. This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

For reference

Line movement

How the odds changed from opening to the current line — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner 1 1.17 ↓ 1.16
Winner 2 4.50 ↑ 4.60

↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.

Match center
Start 27.07.2026 21:30 UTC
Coverage hard
Match center

Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R - Frey A / Stephens S

H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Bookiesapi match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Match Participants Line Movement
More needed
Form Championat, Flashscore
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Overview Championat
Post-match / PropickAI database
Score 2:0
Events 0
Statistics 0
PropickAI check: math model and Glicko-2

We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.

Option Signal Prediction / actual Rating
Glicko-2: base favourite Audit tennis is audit-only for now: surface, serve/return and market are needed Data: line, coverage home - 77.3% fact: home hit / ROI 16.0% / Brier 0.103 / LogLoss 0.257
Glicko-2: calibrated favourite Audit tennis is audit-only for now: surface, serve/return and market are needed Data: line, coverage home - 53.3% fact: home hit / ROI 16.0% / Brier 0.437 / LogLoss 0.630
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R 80.1% 77.3% market and model agree
Frey A / Stephens S 19.9% 22.7%
1X2: 4 Bookies

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 77.3% / 22.7% probabilities
Rating 1,500 / 1,500 Starodubtseva Y / Zarazua R / Frey A / Stephens S
RD 350 / 350 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 800-2,200 / 800-2,200 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 6.20 Fonbet · no value · model 22.7%
1 1.09 Fonbet · no value · model 77.3%
Total
Over 17.5 1.63 Fonbet · line only
Over 18.5 1.52 Fonbet · line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Open on Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Fonbet
— — 1.22 82.0%
— 1.80 55.6% 3.80 26.3%
2.00 50.0% 2.06 48.5% 4.70 21.3%
— 1.87 53.5% 2.35 42.6%
— 2.00 50.0% —
1.74 57.5% 1.76 56.8% —
— 1.87 53.5% —
— — 3.85 26.0%
— — 1.22 82.0%
— — 1.14 87.7%
— — 1.55 64.5%
— — 1.65 60.6%
— — 1.45 69.0%

Total

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Fonbet
Over 17.5 — — 1.63 61.4%
Over 18.5 — — 1.52 65.8%
Over 19.5 — 1.87 53.5% 1.72 58.1%
Over 20.5 1.87 53.5% 1.98 50.5% 4.10 24.4%
Over 21.5 — 2.00 50.0% 1.78 56.2%
Over 22.5 — — 5.80 17.2%
Over 23.5 — — 2.15 46.5%
Over 33.5 — — 2.00 50.0%
Over 34.5 — — 2.20 45.5%
Over 35.5 — — 1.75 57.1%
Under 19.5 — 1.87 53.5% —
Under 20.5 1.87 53.5% 1.82 55.0% —
Under 21.5 — 1.80 55.6% —

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Fonbet Leon
1.16 86.2% 1.16 86.2% 1.09 91.7% 1.15 87.0%
4.70 21.3% 4.80 20.8% 6.20 16.1% 4.60 21.7%