| Krueger A | Boisson L | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 54.2% | 64.5% |
| Hard % | 50% | 54.5% |
| Clay % | 48.6% | 71% |
| Grass % | 72.1% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 55.7% | 65.6% |
| Tie-breaks % | 50% | 59.5% |
| Titles (total) | 3 | 8 |
| Last 10 | LWLWWWWWWW | LWLLLLWLLL |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Krueger A | Boisson L | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 4.88 | 3.56 |
| Double faults per match | 4.38 | 3.89 |
| Breaks per match | 2.51 | 9.5 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 43.8% 7 / 16 Matches | 50.0% 1 / 2 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 38.5% 10 / 26 Matches | 44.4% 4 / 9 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 5.25 | 6.00 |
| Most Aces in a match | 75 % | 100 % |
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 50.0% 5 / 10 Matches | 20.0% 1 / 5 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 50.0% 5 / 10 Matches | 20.0% 1 / 5 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 3.78 | 2.20 |
| Most Aces in a match | 67 % | 40 % |
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 83.3% 15 / 18 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 83.3% 15 / 18 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 5.12 | 4.50 |
| Most Aces in a match | 71 % | 0 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 61.4% 27 / 44 Matches | 22.2% 2 / 9 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 55.6% 30 / 54 Matches | 31.3% 5 / 16 Matches |
| Current rank | 58 | 299 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $1,040,696 USD | $126,909 USD |
| Rating | 58 | 299 |
| Age | 22 | 23 |
| Height | 1.85m | — |
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 61 % | 22 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 61 % | 22 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 39 % | 22 % |
| Wins From Behind | 24 % | 0 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 77 % | 56 % |
| Set 1 Win | 61 % | 33 % |
| Set 2 Win | 55 % | 44 % |
| Set 3 Win | 63 % | 0 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.73 | 8.78 | 9.26 |
| Over 6.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 7.5 | 84 % | 78 % | 81 % |
| Over 8.5 | 73 % | 56 % | 65 % |
| Over 9.5 | 50 % | 44 % | 47 % |
| Over 10.5 | 25 % | 0 % | 13 % |
| Over 11.5 | 25 % | 0 % | 13 % |
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 4.88 | 3.56 | 8.44 |
| Most Aces in a match | 71 % | 44 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 98 % | 100 % | 99 % |
| 2+ | 88 % | 89 % | 97 % |
| 3+ | 76 % | 56 % | 90 % |
| 4+ | 57 % | 44 % | 77 % |
| 5+ | 48 % | 33 % | 63 % |
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 2.51 | 9.5 | 12.01 |
| Over 0.5 | 98 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 98 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 7 % | 100 % | 99 % |
| Over 3.5 | 7 % | 100 % | 84 % |
| Over 4.5 | 2 % | 100 % | 82 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 100 % | 81 % |
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.27 | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| Over 0.5 | 27 % | 22 % | 25 % |
| Over 1.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| Under 0.5 | 73 % | 78 % | 25 % |
| Under 1.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % |
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 4.38 | 3.89 | 8.27 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 98 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 81 % | 89 % | 99 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 76 % | 67 % | 97 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 57 % | 56 % | 90 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 50 % | 44 % | 82 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 29 % | 22 % | 64 % |
| Ashlyn Krueger | Lois Boisson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 7.33 | 6.5 | 13.83 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 67 % | 0 % | 34 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 67 % | 0 % | 34 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 58 % | 0 % | 29 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 50 % | 0 % | 25 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 33 % | 0 % | 17 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 17 % | 0 % | 9 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Krueger A meet Boisson L on August 13, 2026 in the WTA Cincinnati, USA Women Singles.
PrognozAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 69% to win. Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PrognozAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
1 Krueger A — 69%
Pure model vs market (1 · Krueger A): model 66% · market 69% Δ −3 pp model estimates below the market
Model estimate: win Krueger A 69.0%, win Boisson L 31.0%. Model favourite — Krueger A.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Krueger A.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 3 books (Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Head-to-head and form stats
Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics — for reference.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
Onlayn translyatsiya tennisnogo matcha Eshlin Kryuger - Lois Buasson. Tsintsinnati (zh). Vsya informatsiya: statistika, novosti, intervyu, foto
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko69.0% · +Elo prior (weight0.39).
Best value: no value found
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Leon |
|---|---|
| 1.73 57.8% | |
| 2.07 48.3% | |
| 2.07 48.3% | |
| 1.74 57.5% |
| Outcome | Kambi BetMGM |
|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 3.35 29.9% |
| Over 2.5 | 2.63 38.0% |
| Over 6.5 | 1.02 98.0% |
| Over 7.5 | 2.15 46.5% |
| Over 8.5 | 1.41 70.9% |
| Over 9.5 | 2.02 49.5% |
| Over 10.5 | 3.85 26.0% |
| Over 12.5 | 6.25 16.0% |
| Over 16.5 | 1.98 50.5% |
| Over 18.5 | 1.42 70.4% |
| Over 19.5 | 1.58 63.3% |
| Over 20.5 | 1.82 55.0% |
| Over 21.5 | 2.00 50.0% |
| Over 22.5 | 2.28 43.9% |
| Over 23.5 | 2.50 40.0% |
| Under 0.5 | 1.30 76.9% |
| Under 10.5 | 1.23 81.3% |
| Under 12.5 | 1.10 90.9% |
| Outcome | Kambi BetMGM | Kambi Unibet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.37 73.0% | 1.37 73.0% | 1.38 72.5% | |
| 3.10 32.3% | 3.10 32.3% | 3.00 33.3% |
| Bookmaker | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pari | 1.4 | 2.95 |
| Winline | 1.4 | 2.95 |
| Fonbet | 1.4 | 2.95 |
| Betcity | 1.4 | 3 |
Krueger A
Boisson L
Full head-to-head historyKrueger A - Boisson L
The Krueger A - Boisson L breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
By the PropickAI model, Krueger A is favoured — about 69% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Krueger A. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 13, 2026.