AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Sakamoto R. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Milavsky D | Sakamoto R | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 67.1% | 55.7% |
| Hard % | 68.4% | 56.2% |
| Clay % | 50% | 54.5% |
| Grass % | 66.7% | 50% |
| Deciding set % | 54.7% | 62.2% |
| Tie-breaks % | 43.2% | 49.2% |
| Titles (total) | 5 | 2 |
| Last 10 | WWLWWWWLWW | WWLWWLWLWW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Milavsky D | Sakamoto R | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 6.51 | 6.13 |
| Double faults per match | 1.95 | 3.2 |
| Breaks per match | 1.03 | 6.47 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 66.7% 18 / 27 Matches | 66.0% 31 / 47 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 63.0% 29 / 46 Matches | 64.5% 49 / 76 Matches |
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 60.0% 9 / 15 Matches | 50.0% 1 / 2 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 60.0% 9 / 15 Matches | 50.0% 1 / 2 Matches |
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | 80.0% 4 / 5 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | 80.0% 4 / 5 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 61.7% 29 / 47 Matches | 67.3% 37 / 55 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 60.6% 40 / 66 Matches | 65.5% 55 / 84 Matches |
| Current rank | 165 | 306 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $28,907 USD | $2,837 USD |
| Rating | 165 | 306 |
| Age | 20 | 24 |
| Height | 1.93m | 1.93m |
| Weight | 80kg | 91kg |
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 62 % | 67 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 63 % | 67 % |
| Match Wins (5 Sets) | 50 % | N/A |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 43 % | 51 % |
| Wins From Behind | 18 % | 22 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 72 % | 82 % |
| Set 1 Win | 55 % | 67 % |
| Set 2 Win | 57 % | 65 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 10.64 | 9.38 | 10.01 |
| Over 6.5 | 98 % | 96 % | 97 % |
| Over 7.5 | 91 % | 81 % | 86 % |
| Over 8.5 | 79 % | 72 % | 76 % |
| Over 9.5 | 67 % | 46 % | 57 % |
| Over 10.5 | 42 % | 19 % | 31 % |
| Over 11.5 | 42 % | 19 % | 31 % |
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 6.51 | 6.13 | 12.64 |
| Most Aces in a match | 56 % | 53 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 98 % | 97 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 91 % | 93 % | 99 % |
| 3+ | 84 % | 83 % | 98 % |
| 4+ | 79 % | 73 % | 94 % |
| 5+ | 63 % | 67 % | 91 % |
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 1.03 | 6.47 | 7.5 |
| Over 0.5 | 14 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 12 % | 100 % | 85 % |
| Over 2.5 | 7 % | 53 % | 55 % |
| Over 3.5 | 7 % | 53 % | 55 % |
| Over 4.5 | 5 % | 0 % | 54 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 54 % |
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.45 |
| Over 0.5 | 44 % | 24 % | 34 % |
| Over 1.5 | 12 % | 4 % | 8 % |
| Under 0.5 | 56 % | 76 % | 34 % |
| Under 1.5 | 88 % | 96 % | 8 % |
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 1.95 | 3.2 | 5.15 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 79 % | 97 % | 99 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 53 % | 80 % | 95 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 33 % | 67 % | 85 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 19 % | 43 % | 75 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 9 % | 23 % | 59 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 2 % | 10 % | 49 % |
| Rei Sakamoto | Daniel Milavsky | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 7.41 | 6.85 | 14.26 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 77 % | 70 % | 74 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 74 % | 40 % | 57 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 66 % | 20 % | 43 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 60 % | 20 % | 40 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 57 % | 20 % | 39 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 49 % | 20 % | 35 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Milavsky D go head-to-head with Sakamoto R on August 14, 2026 in the ATP Challenger. Brownsburg. Qualification, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Milavsky D 4-0-1, Sakamoto R 4-0-1. PrognozAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 37% to win. Scroll down for team stats, head-to-head record, odds and the PrognozAI AI pick.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Sakamoto R — 63%
Model estimate: win Milavsky D 37.1%, win Sakamoto R 62.9%. Model favourite — Sakamoto R.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Milavsky D.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 2 books (Fonbet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Head-to-head and form stats
Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics — for reference.
Playoff draw
Playoff draw: gismo. For reference.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko37.1% · +Elo prior (weight0.32).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.65 60.6% | |
| 1.78 56.2% | |
| 1.90 52.6% | |
| 1.40 71.4% | |
| 1.01 99.0% | |
| 1.90 52.6% | |
| 1.88 53.2% | |
| 2.02 49.5% | |
| 1.95 51.3% | |
| 2.02 49.5% | |
| 2.40 41.7% | |
| 2.10 47.6% | |
| 1.92 52.1% | |
| 1.80 55.6% | |
| 2.65 37.7% | |
| 11.50 8.7% | |
| 1.80 55.6% | |
| 1.20 83.3% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.02 98.0% | |
| 1.01 99.0% | |
| 11.50 8.7% | |
| 10.00 10.0% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 17.5 | 1.35 74.1% |
| Over 18.5 | 1.80 55.6% |
| Over 19.5 | 9.50 10.5% |
| Over 20.5 | 1.68 59.5% |
| Over 21.5 | 2.60 38.5% |
| Over 22.5 | 2.15 46.5% |
| Over 23.5 | 1.80 55.6% |
| Over 24.5 | 1.90 52.6% |
| Over 25.5 | 2.40 41.7% |
| Under 17.5 | 2.90 34.5% |
| Under 18.5 | 1.90 52.6% |
| Under 19.5 | 1.02 98.0% |
| Under 20.5 | 2.05 48.8% |
| Under 21.5 | 1.45 69.0% |
| Under 22.5 | 1.62 61.7% |
| Under 23.5 | 1.90 52.6% |
| Under 24.5 | 1.80 55.6% |
| Under 25.5 | 1.50 66.7% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 11.50 8.7% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.01 99.0% |
Milavsky D
Sakamoto R
Full head-to-head historyMilavsky D - Sakamoto R
The Milavsky D - Sakamoto R breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
By the PropickAI model, Milavsky D is favoured — about 63% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Milavsky D. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 14, 2026.