AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Chin John. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Chin John | Willwerth B | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 48.9% | 40% |
| Hard % | 54.8% | 33.3% |
| Clay % | 0% | 50% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 58.8% | 30% |
| Tie-breaks % | 62.5% | 43.8% |
| Titles (total) | 2 | 0 |
| Last 10 | LLLLLWWWWW | LLWWWWLLLW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Chin John | Willwerth B | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 1.00 | 1.83 |
| Double faults per match | 3 | 2.17 |
| Breaks per match | 7 | 1.92 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | 30.8% 4 / 13 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | 26.3% 5 / 19 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Most Aces in a match | 0 % | 40 % |
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 55.6% 5 / 9 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 50.0% 5 / 10 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | 3.00 |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | 0 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | 39.1% 9 / 23 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | 33.3% 10 / 30 Matches |
| Current rank | - | 1227 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $4,393 USD | $0 USD |
| Rating | — | 1227 |
| Age | 22 | — |
| Height | 1.83m | 1.91m |
| Weight | 75kg | 82kg |
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 0 % | 39 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 0 % | 39 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 0 % | 30 % |
| Wins From Behind | 0 % | 13 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 0 % | 70 % |
| Set 1 Win | 0 % | 48 % |
| Set 2 Win | 0 % | 55 % |
| Set 3 Win | N/A | 22 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 7 | 9.09 | 8.05 |
| Over 6.5 | 100 % | 91 % | 96 % |
| Over 7.5 | 0 % | 78 % | 39 % |
| Over 8.5 | 0 % | 70 % | 35 % |
| Over 9.5 | 0 % | 30 % | 15 % |
| Over 10.5 | 0 % | 17 % | 9 % |
| Over 11.5 | 0 % | 17 % | 9 % |
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 1.00 | 1.83 | 2.83 |
| Most Aces in a match | 0 % | 33 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 100 % | 67 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 0 % | 67 % | 100 % |
| 3+ | 0 % | 33 % | 42 % |
| 4+ | 0 % | 17 % | 25 % |
| 5+ | 0 % | 0 % | 25 % |
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 7 | 1.92 | 8.92 |
| Over 0.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 100 % | 33 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 100 % |
| Over 3.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 59 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 59 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 59 % |
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0 | 0.3 | 0.15 |
| Over 0.5 | 0 % | 30 % | 15 % |
| Over 1.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| Under 0.5 | 100 % | 70 % | 15 % |
| Under 1.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 0 % |
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 3 | 2.17 | 5.17 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 100 % | 83 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 100 % | 67 % | 92 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 100 % | 17 % | 84 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 0 % | 17 % | 34 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 0 % | 17 % | 25 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 0 % | 17 % | 17 % |
| John Chin | Benjamin Willwerth | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | N/A | 6.88 | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | N/A | 75 % | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | N/A | 75 % | N/A |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | N/A | 25 % | N/A |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | N/A | 25 % | N/A |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | N/A | 25 % | N/A |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | N/A | 25 % | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Chin John take on Willwerth B on August 24, 2026 in the ATP Challenger. Kingston 2. Qualification, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Chin John 1-1-3, Willwerth B 0-0-5. PropickAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 56% to win. Full analysis — form, H2H, odds and the PropickAI AI prediction — follows on this page.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
1 Chin John — 56%
Model estimate: win Chin John 55.6%, win Willwerth B 44.4%. Model favourite — Chin John.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Match winner — Willwerth B
How often this pick wins on our settled history — not a profit forecast.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Willwerth B.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 2 books (Fonbet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Get the 7-AI consensus, math-model probabilities, value picks and full reports for every match with Full Access.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| 2.80 35.7% | — | |
| 2.10 47.6% | 2.01 49.8% | |
| 1.65 60.6% | — | |
| 1.38 72.5% | — | |
| 1.65 60.6% | — | |
| 2.10 47.6% | — | |
| — | 1.75 57.1% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 2.70 37.0% | |
| 9.50 10.5% | |
| 1.03 97.1% | |
| 1.40 71.4% |
| Outcome | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| Over 17.5 | 1.52 65.8% | — |
| Over 18.5 | 1.77 56.5% | 1.76 56.8% |
| Over 19.5 | 2.05 48.8% | 2.02 49.5% |
| Over 20.5 | 2.35 42.6% | — |
| Under 17.5 | 2.35 42.6% | — |
| Under 18.5 | 1.93 51.8% | 2.00 50.0% |
| Under 19.5 | 1.68 59.5% | 1.74 57.5% |
| Under 20.5 | 1.53 65.4% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 3.30 30.3% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.30 76.9% |
Chin John
Willwerth B
The Chin John - Willwerth B breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
By the PropickAI model, Willwerth B is favoured — about 56% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Willwerth B. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 24, 2026.