AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Legout T. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Johns G | Legout T | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 62% | 65.8% |
| Hard % | 61.4% | 66.3% |
| Clay % | 63.4% | 66% |
| Grass % | 50% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 66.2% | 69% |
| Tie-breaks % | 51.9% | 45.7% |
| Titles (total) | 8 | 3 |
| Last 10 | WLWLLWWLLW | WWWWWWLWWW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Johns G | Legout T | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 2.97 | 1.09 |
| Double faults per match | 2.03 | 2.36 |
| Breaks per match | 4.99 | 8.5 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 44.4% 8 / 18 Matches | 70.8% 17 / 24 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 44.7% 17 / 38 Matches | 68.0% 17 / 25 Matches |
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 57.9% 11 / 19 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 55.0% 11 / 20 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 50.0% 2 / 4 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 50.0% 2 / 4 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 51.2% 21 / 41 Matches | 68.0% 17 / 25 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 48.4% 30 / 62 Matches | 65.4% 17 / 26 Matches |
| Current rank | 390 | 535 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $45,725 USD | $62,094 USD |
| Rating | 390 | 535 |
| Age | 25 | 24 |
| Height | 1.80m | 1.78m |
| Weight | 70kg | 73kg |
| Playing hand | Right-handed | Right-handed |
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 51 % | 68 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 51 % | 71 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 34 % | 60 % |
| Wins From Behind | 13 % | 11 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 68 % | 80 % |
| Set 1 Win | 56 % | 72 % |
| Set 2 Win | 45 % | 71 % |
| Set 3 Win | 50 % | 40 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Double Faults | 0 | 3 |
| 1st serve percentage | 61% | 61% |
| 1st serve points won | 57% (23/40) | 80% (20/25) |
| 2nd serve points won | 50% (13/26) | 56% (9/16) |
| Break Points Saved | 11/14 | 3/4 |
| 1st return points won | 20% (5/25) | 43% (17/40) |
| 2nd return points won | 44% (7/16) | 50% (13/26) |
| Break Points Converted | 1/4 | 2/14 |
| Service Points Won | 55% (36/66) | 71% (29/41) |
| Return Points Won | 29% (12/41) | 45% (30/66) |
| Total Points Won | 45% (48/107) | 55% (59/107) |
| Last 10 balls | 3 | 7 |
| Match points saved | 0 | 0 |
| Service games won | 71% (5/7) | 86% (6/7) |
| Return games won | 14% (1/7) | 29% (2/7) |
| Total games won | 43% (6/14) | 57% (8/14) |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.85 | 9.16 | 9.51 |
| Over 6.5 | 95 % | 100 % | 98 % |
| Over 7.5 | 88 % | 88 % | 88 % |
| Over 8.5 | 73 % | 50 % | 62 % |
| Over 9.5 | 54 % | 38 % | 46 % |
| Over 10.5 | 27 % | 17 % | 22 % |
| Over 11.5 | 27 % | 17 % | 22 % |
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 2.97 | 1.09 | 4.06 |
| Most Aces in a match | 33 % | 9 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 81 % | 73 % | 93 % |
| 2+ | 69 % | 27 % | 88 % |
| 3+ | 56 % | 9 % | 72 % |
| 4+ | 31 % | 0 % | 54 % |
| 5+ | 22 % | 0 % | 43 % |
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 4.99 | 8.5 | 13.49 |
| Over 0.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 3.5 | 42 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 4.5 | 42 % | 100 % | 99 % |
| Over 5.5 | 42 % | 55 % | 99 % |
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.44 | 0.08 | 0.26 |
| Over 0.5 | 37 % | 8 % | 22 % |
| Over 1.5 | 7 % | 0 % | 4 % |
| Under 0.5 | 63 % | 92 % | 22 % |
| Under 1.5 | 93 % | 100 % | 4 % |
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 2.03 | 2.36 | 4.39 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 83 % | 91 % | 97 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 44 % | 73 % | 95 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 33 % | 36 % | 86 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 19 % | 27 % | 70 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 17 % | 9 % | 61 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 6 % | 0 % | 53 % |
| Garrett Johns | Timo Legout | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 8.81 | 5.33 | 14.14 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 52 % | 67 % | 60 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 43 % | 67 % | 55 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 33 % | 33 % | 33 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 29 % | 33 % | 31 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 24 % | 0 % | 12 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 10 % | 0 % | 5 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Johns G take on Legout T on August 17, 2026 in the ATP Challenger. Kingston. Qualification, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Johns G 2-0-3, Legout T 4-0-1. PropickAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 31% to win. Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PropickAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Legout T — 69%
Model estimate: win Johns G 30.7%, win Legout T 69.3%. Model favourite — Legout T.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Johns G.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 4 books (Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Model consensus
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
AI overview
AI analysis:1/7 ready · Still preparing:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Claude, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
| AI | 1 | 2 | Score | Total games | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 28% | 72% | 0:2 | Under 21.5 |
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko30.7% · +Elo prior (weight0.33).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 2.40 41.7% | |
| 1.95 51.3% | |
| 1.80 55.6% | |
| 1.45 69.0% | |
| 1.40 71.4% | |
| 1.35 74.1% | |
| 1.02 98.0% | |
| 1.27 78.7% | |
| 1.50 66.7% | |
| 1.75 57.1% | |
| 1.90 52.6% | |
| 2.50 40.0% | |
| 2.85 35.1% | |
| 2.55 39.2% | |
| 2.75 36.4% | |
| 2.95 33.9% | |
| 8.00 12.5% | |
| 3.30 30.3% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.19 84.0% | |
| 10.00 10.0% | |
| 1.02 98.0% | |
| 3.90 25.6% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 17.5 | 1.45 69.0% |
| Over 18.5 | 1.85 54.1% |
| Over 19.5 | 1.80 55.6% |
| Over 20.5 | 2.15 46.5% |
| Over 21.5 | 2.30 43.5% |
| Over 22.5 | 1.95 51.3% |
| Over 23.5 | 1.80 55.6% |
| Over 24.5 | 1.70 58.8% |
| Over 25.5 | 1.70 58.8% |
| Over 26.5 | 3.30 30.3% |
| Over 27.5 | 8.00 12.5% |
| Over 28.5 | 2.95 33.9% |
| Over 29.5 | 3.10 32.3% |
| Under 17.5 | 2.60 38.5% |
| Under 18.5 | 1.85 54.1% |
| Under 19.5 | 1.90 52.6% |
| Under 20.5 | 1.63 61.4% |
| Under 21.5 | 1.55 64.5% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 1.19 84.0% |
| Under 2.5 | 3.90 25.6% |
Johns G
Legout T
The Johns G - Legout T breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
Sportradar · Winline StatsHub
By the PropickAI model, Johns G is favoured — about 69% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Johns G. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 17, 2026.