AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Kim Aidan. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Mallory R | Kim Aidan | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 28.6% | 0% |
| Hard % | 28.6% | 0% |
| Clay % | 0% | 0% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 0% | 0% |
| Tie-breaks % | 20% | 0% |
| Titles (total) | 0 | 0 |
| Last 10 | LLWLLWLLLL | L |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Mallory R | Kim Aidan | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 7.57 | N/A |
| Double faults per match | 2.43 | N/A |
| Breaks per match | 12 | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 70.0% 14 / 20 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 3 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 66.7% 22 / 33 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 3 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 7.57 | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | 86 % | N/A |
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 70.0% 14 / 20 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 3 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 66.7% 22 / 33 Matches | 0.0% 0 / 3 Matches |
| Current rank | 574 | - |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $17,460 USD | $0 USD |
| Rating | 574 | — |
| Age | 21 | — |
| Height | 1.91m | — |
| Weight | 82kg | — |
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 70 % | 0 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 70 % | 0 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 60 % | 0 % |
| Wins From Behind | 14 % | 0 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 80 % | 33 % |
| Set 1 Win | 70 % | 33 % |
| Set 2 Win | 70 % | 0 % |
| Set 3 Win | 50 % | 0 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.9 | 9.67 | 9.79 |
| Over 6.5 | 100 % | 67 % | 84 % |
| Over 7.5 | 85 % | 67 % | 76 % |
| Over 8.5 | 70 % | 67 % | 69 % |
| Over 9.5 | 45 % | 67 % | 56 % |
| Over 10.5 | 30 % | 33 % | 32 % |
| Over 11.5 | 30 % | 33 % | 32 % |
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 7.57 | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | 86 % | N/A | N/A |
| 1+ | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| 2+ | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| 3+ | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| 4+ | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| 5+ | 86 % | N/A | N/A |
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 12 | N/A | N/A |
| Over 0.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 1.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 2.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 3.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 4.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 5.5 | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.56 |
| Over 0.5 | 40 % | 67 % | 53 % |
| Over 1.5 | 5 % | 0 % | 3 % |
| Under 0.5 | 60 % | 33 % | 53 % |
| Under 1.5 | 95 % | 100 % | 3 % |
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 2.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 71 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 71 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 43 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 29 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 14 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 14 % | N/A | N/A |
| Aidan Kim | Richard Mallory | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 8.5 | N/A | N/A |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 100 % | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
Mallory R take on Kim Aidan on August 16, 2026 in the ATP Challenger. Kingston. Qualification, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Mallory R 0-0-5, Kim Aidan 2-0-3. PropickAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 10% to win. Full analysis — form, H2H, odds and the PropickAI AI prediction — follows on this page.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Kim Aidan — 90%
Model estimate: win Mallory R 9.7%, win Kim Aidan 90.3%. Model favourite — Kim Aidan.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Kim Aidan.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 4 books (Betcity, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Betcity | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.05 48.8% | 2.10 47.6% | 2.11 47.4% | |
| — | 1.65 60.6% | — | |
| 1.68 59.5% | — | 1.68 59.5% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 5.70 17.5% | |
| 1.10 90.9% |
| Outcome | Betcity | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 16.5 | — | 1.48 67.6% | — |
| Over 17.5 | 1.86 53.8% | 1.87 53.5% | 1.92 52.1% |
| Over 18.5 | — | 2.35 42.6% | — |
| Over 19.5 | — | 2.90 34.5% | — |
| Under 16.5 | — | 2.45 40.8% | — |
| Under 17.5 | 1.84 54.4% | 1.83 54.6% | 1.82 55.0% |
| Under 18.5 | — | 1.52 65.8% | — |
| Under 19.5 | — | 1.35 74.1% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 6.10 16.4% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.09 91.7% |
Mallory R
Kim Aidan
The Mallory R - Kim Aidan breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
Sportradar · Winline StatsHub
By the PropickAI model, Kim Aidan is favoured — about 90% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Kim Aidan. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 16, 2026.