PropickAI PropickAI
Sign in Sign up
Free access Sign in to unlock the full prediction Create a free account to see the full AI breakdown, probabilities, risks and history.
ATP Challenger. Lexington. Doubles
ATP Challenger. Lexington. Doubles International
04.08.2026 22:25 UTC Match prediction

Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R - Loutit J / Stephenson E

✓ Prematch ready Prematch data ✓Line –Form –H2H ✓Prediction
Tennis ATP Challenger. Lexington. Doubles
ATP Challenger. Lexington. Doubles grass 04.08.2026 22:25 UTC Finished
04.08.2026 22:25 UTC Finished
Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R
Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R
Loutit J / Stephenson E
Loutit J / Stephenson E
2:0 6:2 6:2
1 2 GP
Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R 6 6 2
Loutit J / Stephenson E 2 2 0
1 2
Odds
P1 1.13 83.2% BetBoom
P2 5.60 16.8% BetBoom
Coverage: grass
Preview Statistics Broadcast Comments

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
grass Coverage grass
0 H2H 0

Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R meet Loutit J / Stephenson E on August 4, 2026 in the ATP Challenger. Lexington. Doubles, International.

PrognozAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 80% to win. Scroll down for team stats, head-to-head record, odds and the PrognozAI AI pick.

🎯 PropickAI prediction
Medium confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

1 Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R — 80%

Pure model vs market (1 · Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R): model 52% · market 83% Δ −31 pp model estimates below the market

1 · Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R ✓ Pick79.7%
market83%
2 · Loutit J / Stephenson E20.3%
market17%

Model estimate: win Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R 79.7%, win Loutit J / Stephenson E 20.3%. Model favourite — Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R - Loutit J / Stephenson E August 4, 2026

Tennis math model

Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R.

Line favourite Fonbet: Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 1.02 / 2 10.00
  • Glicko: Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R 79.7% / Loutit J / Stephenson E 20.3%

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 8.0% 4 books · best price +1.4%
1 ✓ Pick 83.1%
2 16.9%

Odds source: consensus of 4 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Fonbet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

For reference

Line movement

How the odds changed from opening to the current line — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner 1 1.10 ↑ 1.11
Winner 2 5.40 ↓ 5.30

↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.

Match center
Start 04.08.2026 22:25 UTC
Market 1 90.7% @ 1.02 / 2 9.3% @ 10.00
Coverage grass
Match center

Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R - Loutit J / Stephenson E

H2H 0 head-to-head matches
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Flashscore match data source checked
Odds match data source checked
Bookiesapi match data source checked
Line depth match data source checked
Present in data
Market Match Participants Line Movement
More needed
Form Championat, Flashscore
H2H Championat, Flashscore
Tournament Championat, Flashscore
Overview Championat
Post-match / PropickAI database
Score 2:0
Events 0
Statistics 0
Set Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R Loutit J / Stephenson E Result
Set 1 6 2 6:2
Set 2 6 2 6:2
PropickAI check: math model and Glicko-2

We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.

Option Signal Prediction / actual Rating
Glicko-2: base favourite Audit tennis is audit-only for now: surface, serve/return and market are needed Data: line, coverage home - 79.7% fact: home hit / ROI 13.0% / Brier 0.082 / LogLoss 0.227
Glicko-2: calibrated favourite Audit tennis is audit-only for now: surface, serve/return and market are needed Data: line, coverage home - 53.6% fact: home hit / ROI 13.0% / Brier 0.431 / LogLoss 0.624
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R 82.8% 79.7% market and model agree
Loutit J / Stephenson E 17.3% 20.3%
1X2: 4 Bookies

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 79.7% / 20.3% probabilities
Rating 1,500 / 1,500 Nam Ji Sung / Stalder R / Loutit J / Stephenson E
RD 350 / 350 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 800-2,200 / 800-2,200 strength interval
HFA: 0 HFA mu: 0.000 MoV: on N: N=1 P: two_way_glicko2_expected_score

Best value: no value found

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 10.00 Fonbet · no value · model 20.3%
1 1.02 Fonbet · no value · model 79.7%
Total
Over 15.5 1.45 Fonbet · line only
Over 16.5 7.90 Fonbet · line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Open on Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Fonbet
1.67 59.9%
1.50 66.7%
1.01 99.0%
1.02 98.0%
2.45 40.8%
2.08 48.1%
2.40 41.7%
9.00 11.1%
8.00 12.5%
1.48 67.6%

Total

Outcome Fonbet
Over 15.5 1.45 69.0%
Over 16.5 7.90 12.7%
Over 17.5 9.00 11.1%
Over 18.5 2.40 41.7%
Over 19.5 2.40 41.7%
Over 20.5 1.92 52.1%
Over 21.5 2.15 46.5%
Under 15.5 2.55 39.2%
Under 16.5 1.02 98.0%
Under 17.5 1.01 99.0%
Under 18.5 1.50 66.7%
Under 19.5 1.50 66.7%
Under 20.5 1.78 56.2%
Under 21.5 1.63 61.4%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Fonbet Leon
1.11 90.1% 1.13 88.5% 1.02 98.0% 1.12 89.3%
5.60 17.9% 5.00 20.0% 10.00 10.0% 5.40 18.5%