AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Brady, Patrick. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Deckers, Alec | Brady, Patrick | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 62.3% | 50% |
| Hard % | 65% | 50% |
| Clay % | 60.3% | 0% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 56.1% | 0% |
| Tie-breaks % | 56.5% | 0% |
| Titles (total) | 4 | 0 |
| Last 10 | WLWWLWLWWL | WL |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Deckers, Alec | Brady, Patrick | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 12.50 | 2.64 |
| Double faults per match | 2.75 | 1.5 |
| Breaks per match | 2.29 | 3.14 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 55.9% 19 / 34 Matches | 64.7% 11 / 17 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 61.8% 34 / 55 Matches | 62.5% 15 / 24 Matches |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 50.0% 2 / 4 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 55.6% 5 / 9 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | 42.9% 3 / 7 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 0.0% 0 / 1 Matches | 42.9% 3 / 7 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (100.0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) |
| Wins this year | 53.7% 22 / 41 Matches | 58.3% 14 / 24 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 58.8% 40 / 68 Matches | 58.1% 18 / 31 Matches |
| Current rank | 585 | 812 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $37,131 USD | $21,453 USD |
| Rating | 585 | 812 |
| Age | 26 | 21 |
| Height | 1.93m | 1.88m |
| Weight | 83kg | 76kg |
| Playing hand | Right-handed | Right-handed |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 54 % | 58 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 54 % | 58 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 32 % | 46 % |
| Wins From Behind | 21 % | 9 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 71 % | 75 % |
| Set 1 Win | 49 % | 63 % |
| Set 2 Win | 54 % | 58 % |
| Set 3 Win | 56 % | 43 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Date | Tournament | Results |
|---|---|---|
| May 2 2023 | M25 Nottingham 3 ITF Men (Hard) | Alec Deckers 0 – 2 Patrick Brady |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 10.39 | 10 | 10.2 |
| Over 6.5 | 92 % | 100 % | 96 % |
| Over 7.5 | 87 % | 75 % | 81 % |
| Over 8.5 | 79 % | 63 % | 71 % |
| Over 9.5 | 64 % | 50 % | 57 % |
| Over 10.5 | 41 % | 42 % | 42 % |
| Over 11.5 | 41 % | 42 % | 42 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 12.50 | 2.64 | 15.14 |
| Most Aces in a match | 92 % | 14 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 100 % | 79 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 100 % | 71 % | 100 % |
| 3+ | 100 % | 43 % | 100 % |
| 4+ | 100 % | 29 % | 97 % |
| 5+ | 100 % | 7 % | 97 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 2.29 | 3.14 | 5.43 |
| Over 0.5 | 92 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 33 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 33 % | 100 % | 96 % |
| Over 3.5 | 0 % | 100 % | 67 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 43 % | 67 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 43 % | 34 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.64 | 0.42 | 0.53 |
| Over 0.5 | 54 % | 38 % | 46 % |
| Over 1.5 | 10 % | 4 % | 7 % |
| Under 0.5 | 46 % | 63 % | 46 % |
| Under 1.5 | 90 % | 96 % | 7 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 2.75 | 1.5 | 4.25 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 100 % | 86 % | 97 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 58 % | 57 % | 93 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 33 % | 7 % | 77 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 25 % | 0 % | 66 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 25 % | 0 % | 44 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 17 % | 0 % | 36 % |
| Alec Deckers | Patrick Brady | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 5.9 | 18 | 23.9 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 40 % | 100 % | 70 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 40 % | 100 % | 70 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 40 % | 100 % | 70 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 40 % | 60 % | 50 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 40 % | 60 % | 50 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 40 % | 60 % | 50 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Deckers, Alec take on Brady, Patrick on August 18, 2026 in the ATP Challenger. Roehampton.
Read on for detailed stats, previous meetings, the bookmaker line and the PropickAI neural-network verdict.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Brady, Patrick — 58%
Model estimate: win Deckers, Alec 41.9%, win Brady, Patrick 58.1%. Model favourite — Brady, Patrick.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 4 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
Model consensus
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
AI overview
AI analysis:1/7 ready · Still preparing:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Claude, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
Patrick Brady is favored to win this hardcourt match at the Roehampton Challenger. The pre-match analysis points to a clear structural advantage for the British player on his home soil.
Outcome Probabilities and Market Context
The analytical model suggests a 42% probability for an Alec Deckers victory (P1) and a 58% probability for a Patrick Brady win (P2). This baseline lines up perfectly with historical data and court adjustments. Patrick Brady has already proven his technical advantage over Deckers in direct matchups, and playing in London provides him with additional physical and environmental comfort.
Current Form and Qualification Trajectory
Both competitors entered the main draw through the qualification stages, holding an identical WLWWL metric over their last 5 appearances. However, their physical exertion in yesterday's final qualifying round differed significantly:
Alec Deckers had a grueling, three-set battle against Ali Habib (3-6, 6-3, 6-2). He blasted 11 aces but also leaked 5 break point opportunities.
Patrick Brady pulled off a highly efficient, straight-sets upset (6-1, 6-4) over the qualification's top seed, Olukayode Alafia Damina Ayeni. Brady stayed composed, dropping his serve just once while breaking his opponent four times.
Head-to-Head (H2H) History
The head-to-head record stands at 1-0 in favor of Patrick Brady. They faced each other on a similar fast, indoor hardcourt back in 2023. Brady won that encounter in straight sets (7-5, 6-3), successfully nullifying Deckers' huge serve by winning 72% of his own first-serve points and converting critical break opportunities.
Injuries, Lines, and Extra Markets
There are no reported injuries or suspensions for either athlete; both are fully fit and highly motivated for this Challenger 50 event. Given the fast nature of the Roehampton outdoor hardcourts, breaks of serve will be at a premium.
Total Games Line: Over 22.5 Games. Deckers' reliance on his big serve suggests at least one long or tiebreak-threatened set, pushing the game count higher.
Exact Score Forecast: 0:2 in favor of Brady. Brady's cleaner returning style and superior court coverage should allow him to resolve the match in two tightly contested sets.
Main Bet Conclusion
The primary recommendation is to back Patrick Brady to win (P2). His straight-set performance yesterday against a higher-seeded opponent, combined with his existing 1-0 H2H edge over Deckers, confirms that his tactical toolkit matches up perfectly against the Dutchman's style.
| AI | 1 | 2 | Score | Total games | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 42% | 58% | 0:2 | Over 22.5 | P2 |
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko41.9% · +Elo prior (weight0.40).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 1.98 50.5% | |
| 1.84 54.4% | 1.83 54.6% | 1.83 54.6% | |
| 1.97 50.8% | 1.93 51.8% | — | |
| — | — | 1.77 56.5% | |
| 1.88 53.2% | 1.87 53.5% | 1.91 52.4% | |
| 1.76 56.8% | 1.77 56.5% | — |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Kambi Unibet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | — | — | 2.23 44.8% |
| Over 8.5 | — | — | 1.22 82.0% |
| Over 9.5 | — | — | 1.74 57.5% |
| Over 10.5 | — | — | 3.05 32.8% |
| Over 21.5 | 1.88 53.2% | 1.85 54.1% | 1.60 62.5% |
| Over 22.5 | 1.89 52.9% | 1.88 53.2% | 1.81 55.3% |
| Over 23.5 | — | — | 2.02 49.5% |
| Under 2.5 | — | — | 1.62 61.7% |
| Under 10.5 | — | — | 1.34 74.6% |
| Under 21.5 | 1.84 54.4% | 1.85 54.1% | 2.23 44.8% |
| Under 22.5 | 1.83 54.6% | 1.82 55.0% | — |
| Outcome | Baltbet | Betcity | Kambi Unibet | Leon |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.25 44.4% | 2.30 43.5% | 2.38 42.0% | 2.24 44.6% | |
| 1.58 63.3% | 1.54 64.9% | 1.56 64.1% | 1.58 63.3% |
Deckers, Alec
Gannon C. 🇮🇪
Yilmaz K. 🇹🇷
Brady, Patrick
Hudd E. 🇬🇧
Martin T. 🇬🇧
The Deckers, Alec - Brady, Patrick breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
August 18, 2026.