AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Zheng Michael. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Svajda T | Zheng Michael | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 62.5% | 64.8% |
| Hard % | 62.5% | 66.7% |
| Clay % | 0% | 57.1% |
| Grass % | 0% | 55.6% |
| Deciding set % | 52.4% | 53.1% |
| Tie-breaks % | 55.6% | 40.5% |
| Titles (total) | 4 | 4 |
| Last 10 | WLWLWWLWWW | LWLWLWWWLW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Svajda T | Zheng Michael | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 4.42 | 3.25 |
| Double faults per match | 2.33 | 2.12 |
| Breaks per match | 1.48 | 2.41 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 66.7% 12 / 18 Matches | 57.1% 12 / 21 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 74.2% 23 / 31 Matches | 57.1% 16 / 28 Matches |
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 75.0% 3 / 4 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 75.0% 3 / 4 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | N/A 0 / 0 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 63.6% 21 / 33 Matches | 57.1% 12 / 21 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 69.6% 32 / 46 Matches | 57.1% 16 / 28 Matches |
| Current rank | 113 | 383 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $81,357 USD | $35,793 USD |
| Rating | 113 | 383 |
| Age | 22 | 20 |
| Height | 1.88m | 1.75m |
| Weight | 73kg | 69kg |
| Playing hand | Right-handed | Right-handed |
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 64 % | 57 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 63 % | 57 % |
| Match Wins (5 Sets) | 67 % | N/A |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 36 % | 38 % |
| Wins From Behind | 33 % | 10 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 82 % | 67 % |
| Set 1 Win | 58 % | 57 % |
| Set 2 Win | 64 % | 48 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 10.24 | 9.38 | 9.81 |
| Over 6.5 | 96 % | 95 % | 96 % |
| Over 7.5 | 96 % | 81 % | 89 % |
| Over 8.5 | 92 % | 62 % | 77 % |
| Over 9.5 | 71 % | 48 % | 60 % |
| Over 10.5 | 25 % | 19 % | 22 % |
| Over 11.5 | 25 % | 19 % | 22 % |
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 4.42 | 3.25 | 7.67 |
| Most Aces in a match | 46 % | 31 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 88 % | 94 % | 96 % |
| 2+ | 75 % | 69 % | 88 % |
| 3+ | 67 % | 56 % | 88 % |
| 4+ | 54 % | 31 % | 77 % |
| 5+ | 42 % | 25 % | 75 % |
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 1.48 | 2.41 | 3.89 |
| Over 0.5 | 58 % | 75 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 58 % | 69 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 17 % | 63 % | 59 % |
| Over 3.5 | 8 % | 6 % | 41 % |
| Over 4.5 | 8 % | 6 % | 41 % |
| Over 5.5 | 8 % | 6 % | 13 % |
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.4 |
| Over 0.5 | 29 % | 48 % | 38 % |
| Over 1.5 | 4 % | 0 % | 2 % |
| Under 0.5 | 71 % | 52 % | 38 % |
| Under 1.5 | 96 % | 100 % | 2 % |
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 2.33 | 2.12 | 4.45 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 79 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 63 % | 75 % | 96 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 38 % | 31 % | 89 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 25 % | 6 % | 67 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 17 % | 0 % | 56 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 13 % | 0 % | 43 % |
| Michael Zheng | Trevor Svajda | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 11 | 5.94 | 16.94 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 90 % | 75 % | 83 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 80 % | 63 % | 72 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 80 % | 50 % | 65 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 80 % | 38 % | 59 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 80 % | 25 % | 53 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 60 % | 13 % | 37 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Svajda T take on Zheng Michael on August 13, 2026 in the ATP Cincinnati, USA Men Singles, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Svajda T 3-0-2, Zheng Michael 3-0-2. PrognozAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 32% to win. Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PrognozAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
2 Zheng Michael — 68%
Model estimate: win Svajda T 32.4%, win Zheng Michael 67.6%. Model favourite — Zheng Michael.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Independent AI-agent assessment from our data (model, market line, form, H2H)
Analytical AI-agent assessment, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Zheng Michael.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 6 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Head-to-head and form stats
Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics — for reference.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko32.4% · +Elo prior (weight0.49).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.90 52.6% | |
| 2.20 45.5% | |
| 1.60 62.5% | |
| 1.87 53.5% | |
| 2.65 37.7% | |
| 2.55 39.2% | |
| 1.05 95.2% | |
| 1.17 85.5% | |
| 2.55 39.2% | |
| 2.70 37.0% | |
| 2.25 44.4% | |
| 2.95 33.9% | |
| 1.85 54.1% | |
| 1.60 62.5% | |
| 2.20 45.5% | |
| 1.88 53.2% | |
| 1.42 70.4% | |
| 1.48 67.6% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.04 96.2% | |
| 2.60 38.5% | |
| 1.43 69.9% | |
| 8.50 11.8% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 18.5 | 1.55 64.5% |
| Over 19.5 | 1.90 52.6% |
| Over 20.5 | 1.70 58.8% |
| Over 21.5 | 1.70 58.8% |
| Over 22.5 | 2.10 47.6% |
| Over 23.5 | 1.95 51.3% |
| Over 24.5 | 1.78 56.2% |
| Over 25.5 | 1.77 56.5% |
| Over 26.5 | 1.85 54.1% |
| Over 27.5 | 1.75 57.1% |
| Over 28.5 | 1.40 71.4% |
| Over 29.5 | 1.48 67.6% |
| Over 30.5 | 4.50 22.2% |
| Over 31.5 | 5.70 17.5% |
| Under 18.5 | 2.35 42.6% |
| Under 19.5 | 1.85 54.1% |
| Under 20.5 | 2.02 49.5% |
| Under 21.5 | 2.10 47.6% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 1.43 69.9% |
| Under 2.5 | 2.60 38.5% |
| Bookmaker | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pari | 3.15 | 1.35 |
| Winline | 3.15 | 1.36 |
| Fonbet | 3.15 | 1.35 |
| Betcity | 3.3 | 1.34 |
Svajda T
Zheng Michael
Full head-to-head historySvajda T - Zheng Michael
The Svajda T - Zheng Michael breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
By the PropickAI model, Zheng Michael is favoured — about 68% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Zheng Michael. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 13, 2026.