AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Vandecasteele Q. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Tu Li | Vandecasteele Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 57.8% | 55.2% |
| Hard % | 59.8% | 56.3% |
| Clay % | 16.7% | 38.5% |
| Grass % | 58.8% | 55.6% |
| Deciding set % | 52.6% | 39.1% |
| Tie-breaks % | 52% | 55.8% |
| Titles (total) | 7 | 1 |
| Last 10 | LLLLWWWWLW | LWWWLLWLLL |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Tu Li | Vandecasteele Q | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 8.05 | 5.06 |
| Double faults per match | 3.23 | 3.12 |
| Breaks per match | 1.77 | 3.59 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 67.9% 19 / 28 Matches | 58.8% 20 / 34 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 60.0% 21 / 35 Matches | 57.4% 31 / 54 Matches |
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | 62.5% 5 / 8 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 0.0% 0 / 2 Matches | 62.5% 5 / 8 Matches |
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 50.0% 3 / 6 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 60.0% 6 / 10 Matches | 50.0% 3 / 6 Matches |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 63.3% 19 / 30 Matches | 58.3% 28 / 48 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 56.3% 27 / 48 Matches | 57.4% 39 / 68 Matches |
| Current rank | 496 | 483 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $553,005 USD | $46,118 USD |
| Rating | 496 | 483 |
| Age | 30 | 23 |
| Height | 1.83m | 1.91m |
| Weight | 80kg | 79kg |
| Playing hand | Right-handed | Right-handed |
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 63 % | 58 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 63 % | 58 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 43 % | 52 % |
| Wins From Behind | 31 % | 9 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 73 % | 75 % |
| Set 1 Win | 57 % | 67 % |
| Set 2 Win | 60 % | 60 % |
| Set 3 Win | 67 % | 27 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces | 1 | 3 |
| Double Faults | 4 | 3 |
| 1st serve percentage | 56% | 54% |
| 1st serve points won | 71% (17/24) | 76% (26/34) |
| 2nd serve points won | 32% (6/19) | 52% (15/29) |
| Break Points Saved | 3/7 | 5/6 |
| 1st return points won | 38% (13/34) | 33% (8/24) |
| 2nd return points won | 48% (14/29) | 68% (13/19) |
| Break Points Converted | 1/6 | 4/7 |
| Winners | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced errors | 0 | 0 |
| Net points won | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Service Points Won | 53% (23/43) | 65% (41/63) |
| Return Points Won | 35% (22/63) | 47% (20/43) |
| Total Points Won | 42% (45/106) | 58% (61/106) |
| Last 10 balls | 5 | 5 |
| Match points saved | 2 | 0 |
| Service games won | 50% (4/8) | 89% (8/9) |
| Return games won | 11% (1/9) | 50% (4/8) |
| Total games won | 29% (5/17) | 71% (12/17) |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.6 | 9.69 | 9.65 |
| Over 6.5 | 97 % | 98 % | 98 % |
| Over 7.5 | 87 % | 88 % | 88 % |
| Over 8.5 | 70 % | 69 % | 70 % |
| Over 9.5 | 37 % | 40 % | 39 % |
| Over 10.5 | 27 % | 27 % | 27 % |
| Over 11.5 | 27 % | 27 % | 27 % |
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 8.05 | 5.06 | 13.11 |
| Most Aces in a match | 64 % | 70 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 100 % | 94 % | 100 % |
| 2+ | 95 % | 94 % | 99 % |
| 3+ | 86 % | 79 % | 96 % |
| 4+ | 82 % | 61 % | 93 % |
| 5+ | 68 % | 55 % | 85 % |
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 1.77 | 3.59 | 5.36 |
| Over 0.5 | 95 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 91 % | 100 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 0 % | 97 % | 76 % |
| Over 3.5 | 0 % | 97 % | 71 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 70 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 50 % |
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.4 | 0.31 | 0.36 |
| Over 0.5 | 33 % | 29 % | 31 % |
| Over 1.5 | 7 % | 2 % | 4 % |
| Under 0.5 | 67 % | 71 % | 31 % |
| Under 1.5 | 93 % | 98 % | 4 % |
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 3.23 | 3.12 | 6.35 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 91 % | 94 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 73 % | 73 % | 93 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 59 % | 61 % | 89 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 45 % | 42 % | 78 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 27 % | 21 % | 63 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 14 % | 12 % | 50 % |
| Li Tu | Quinn Vandecasteele | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 7.31 | 6.28 | 13.59 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 83 % | 69 % | 76 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 72 % | 56 % | 64 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 67 % | 50 % | 59 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 50 % | 25 % | 38 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 39 % | 6 % | 23 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 33 % | 6 % | 20 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Tu Li go head-to-head with Vandecasteele Q on August 22, 2026 in the ATP. Uinston-Seylem, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Tu Li 1-0-4, Vandecasteele Q 3-0-2. PropickAI's Glicko-2 model gives the home side 47% to win. Scroll down for team stats, head-to-head record, odds and the PropickAI AI pick.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
2 Vandecasteele Q — 53%
Model estimate: win Tu Li 47.0%, win Vandecasteele Q 53.0%. Model favourite — Vandecasteele Q.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Math-model prediction
Based on the collected prematch data, the favourite looks like Vandecasteele Q.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 4 books (Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Model consensus
Modeli dayut edinyy signal. Takie matchi my pomechaem kak bolee silnye.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
AI overview
AI analysis:1/7 ready · Still preparing:DeepSeek, ChatGPT, Claude, Qwen, Kimi, GLM 5.2
The upcoming qualification match at the ATP Winston-Salem Open features Li Tu going head-to-head against Quinn Vandecasteele. Both hard-court competitors are fighting for a spot in the main draw, setting up a closely contested baseline battle.
Current Form and Tactical Analysis
Li Tu (Home): Shows mixed recent form with 2 wins and 3 losses in his last 5 matches. His veteran experience at the ATP Challenger level gives him a steady edge in high-pressure qualification matches.
Quinn Vandecasteele (Away): Enters this contest in identical form with 2 wins and 3 losses over his last 5 appearances. The younger player relies heavily on his big serve and high-risk baseline aggression, which can lead to streaks of unforced errors.
Head-to-Head and Team News
Head-to-Head History: Li Tu and Quinn Vandecasteele have never faced each other on the professional tour, making this their inaugural H2H meeting.
Injuries and Suspensions: There are no reported injuries or physical limitations for either player leading into this qualification round. Both athletes are fully fit and rested.
Market Divergence and Probabilities
The de-vigged market consensus positions this match as an absolute coin-flip, presenting odds at 49% for Li Tu and 51% for Quinn Vandecasteele. However, my analytical model diverges slightly from the bookmakers. Li Tu possesses superior tactical variety and vastly more experience on North American hard courts compared to the raw collegiate profile of Vandecasteele. This experience tilts the real probability, giving Tu a marginal advantage in sustaining rallies under hot, fast daytime conditions.
P1 (Li Tu Win): 53%
P2 (Quinn Vandecasteele Win): 47%
Additional Markets Forecast
Given the identical recent form and baseline-centric playing styles of both athletes, a highly competitive affair is anticipated.
Total Games: Over 22.5 games. The fast outdoor hard courts favor the server, making early breaks difficult and increasing the likelihood of long sets or a tiebreaker.
Exact Score by Sets: 2:1 in favor of Li Tu. Vandecasteele's powerful serve should secure him a set, but Tu's superior consistency will prevail in the deciding frames.
Conclusion
The main bet for this fixture is Li Tu to win (P1). His strategic variation and top-level transition game should expose Vandecasteele's unforced errors as the match progresses into deeper sets.
| AI | 1 | 2 | Score | Total games | Bet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AI | 53% | 47% | 2:1 | Over 22.5 | P1 |
Get the 7-AI consensus, math-model probabilities, value picks and full reports for every match with Full Access.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
We mark in green only strong signals where the model passed our publication filter. The other rows are for audit and training.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko47.0% · +Elo prior (weight0.60).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| 2.00 50.0% | 1.89 52.9% | |
| 1.85 54.1% | — | |
| 1.70 58.8% | — | |
| 2.15 46.5% | — | |
| 1.73 57.8% | — | |
| 1.85 54.1% | — | |
| 2.02 49.5% | — | |
| 1.63 61.4% | 1.85 54.1% |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.42 70.4% | |
| 3.35 29.9% | |
| 1.28 78.1% | |
| 2.65 37.7% |
| Outcome | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| Over 21.5 | 1.65 60.6% | — |
| Over 22.5 | 1.90 52.6% | 1.89 52.9% |
| Over 23.5 | 2.10 47.6% | — |
| Over 24.5 | 1.95 51.3% | — |
| Under 21.5 | 2.10 47.6% | — |
| Under 22.5 | 1.80 55.6% | 1.85 54.1% |
| Under 23.5 | 1.65 60.6% | — |
| Under 24.5 | 1.75 57.1% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 2.25 44.4% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.57 63.7% |
| Bookmaker | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pari | 1.98 | 1.78 |
| Winline | 1.93 | 1.88 |
| Fonbet | 1.98 | 1.78 |
| Betcity | 1.94 | 1.8 |
Tu Li
Vandecasteele Q
The Tu Li - Vandecasteele Q breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
By the PropickAI model, Vandecasteele Q is favoured — about 53% win probability.
The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Vandecasteele Q. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.
August 22, 2026.