PropickAI PropickAI
Sign in Sign up
English

AI verdict

AI pick Van de Zandschulp B win probability ~74% confidence High best odds 1.27

Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Van de Zandschulp B. Full breakdown below.

Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
Full Access Go deeper than the free pick Your free pick and probability are below. Full Access adds the full 7-AI consensus, every value-edge pick, math-model probabilities and complete reports for every match.
Get Full Access →
US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge
US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge International
31.08.2026 15:00 UTC

Choinski J vs Van de Zandschulp B — Tennis prediction

✓ Prematch ready Prematch data ✓Line ✓Form –H2H ✓Prediction
Tennis US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge
US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge grass 31.08.2026 15:00 UTC Not started
31.08.2026 15:00 UTC Not started
Choinski J
Choinski J
Rank #71 Elo 834
51Average Form
L W W L W L W W
Van de Zandschulp B
Van de Zandschulp B
Rank #75 Elo 773
56Average Form
L W L W W W L L
-:-
Coverage: grass
Preview

Extended stats (scorego)

Choinski J Van de Zandschulp B
Win % 56.2% 50%
Hard % 38% 0%
Clay % 64.5% 50%
Grass % 43.5% 0%
Deciding set % 56.8% 0%
Tie-breaks % 47.7% 0%
Titles (total) 10 0
Last 10 LLLWWWWWLW LW

Source: scorego-app.com

About the athletes

- Country -
#71 Rating #75
30 Age 30
1.91m Height (cm) 1.96m
85kg Weight (kg) 88kg
Right Hand Right
- Seed -
grass Coverage grass
0 H2H 0

Serve and return stats

Choinski J Van de Zandschulp B
Aces per match 5.56 5.42
Double faults per match 4.5 2.08
Breaks per match 2.21 1.96

Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)

TennisStats: rating, form and serve/return

Botic Van De Zandschulp
Rank:71 Elo: 834
L W W L W L W W
Jan Choinski
Rank:75 Elo: 773
L W L W W W L L
Elo favourite:Van de Zandschulp B (edge +61 Elo)

Hard

Botic Van De ZandschulpJan Choinski
Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year 52.6% 10 / 19 Matches 35.7% 5 / 14 Matches
Win Percentage Last 12 Months 46.9% 15 / 32 Matches 36.8% 7 / 19 Matches

Clay

Botic Van De ZandschulpJan Choinski
Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year 58.3% 7 / 12 Matches 62.1% 18 / 29 Matches
Win Percentage Last 12 Months 58.3% 7 / 12 Matches 68.1% 32 / 47 Matches

Grass

Botic Van De ZandschulpJan Choinski
Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year 33.3% 1 / 3 Matches 80.0% 4 / 5 Matches
Win Percentage Last 12 Months 33.3% 1 / 3 Matches 80.0% 4 / 5 Matches

Source:tennisstats.com

H2H series (tennisstats)

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski
H2H wins 2 (66.7%) 1 (33.3%)
Sets 4 (66.7%) 2 (33.3%)
Wins this year 51.2% 21 / 41 Matches 56.0% 28 / 50 Matches
Wins in 12 mo. 48.2% 26 / 54 Matches 60.8% 45 / 74 Matches
Current rank 71 75

Source: tennisstats.com

Profile and percentages (tennisstats)

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski
Prize money (career) $5,629,377 USD $965,532 USD
Rating 71 75
Age 30 30
Height 1.91m 1.96m
Weight 85kg 88kg
Playing hand Right-handed Right-handed

Win percentage (match / set)

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski
Match Wins 51 % 56 %
Match Wins (3 Sets) 53 % 56 %
Match Wins (5 Sets) 50 % N/A
Wins in Straight Sets 37 % 36 %
Wins From Behind 9 % 21 %
Won At Least 1 Set 73 % 76 %
Set 1 Win 56 % 50 %
Set 2 Win 51 % 62 %

Source:tennisstats.com

Head-to-Head Record

Date Tournament Results
Jul 8 2025 Braunschweig Chall. Men (Clay) Botic Van De Zandschulp 2 – 0 Jan Choinski
Jul 17 2018 Scheveningen Chall. Men (Clay) Botic Van De Zandschulp 2 – 0 Jan Choinski
Jan 26 2018 M25 Nussloch ITF Men (Hard) Botic Van De Zandschulp 0 – 2 Jan Choinski

Source:tennisstats.com

Betting benchmarks (tennisstats)

Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.

Total games

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski Match total
Average Games in a Set 9.93 10.18 10.06
Over 6.5 100 % 100 % 100 %
Over 7.5 97 % 92 % 95 %
Over 8.5 85 % 81 % 83 %
Over 9.5 50 % 67 % 59 %
Over 10.5 32 % 31 % 32 %
Over 11.5 32 % 31 % 32 %

Aces

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski Match total
Aces Per Match 5.56 5.42 10.98
Most Aces in a match 47 % 42 % N/A
1+ 91 % 96 % 96 %
2+ 85 % 88 % 96 %
3+ 74 % 79 % 95 %
4+ 65 % 67 % 86 %
5+ 47 % 56 % 84 %

Breaks

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski Match total
Breaks Per Match 2.21 1.96 4.17
Over 0.5 94 % 98 % 100 %
Over 1.5 53 % 94 % 100 %
Over 2.5 6 % 56 % 96 %
Over 3.5 3 % 2 % 67 %
Over 4.5 0 % 0 % 44 %
Over 5.5 0 % 0 % 5 %

Tie-breaks

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski Match total
Tie Breaks Per Match 0.53 0.48 0.5
Over 0.5 50 % 38 % 44 %
Over 1.5 3 % 8 % 6 %
Under 0.5 50 % 63 % 44 %
Under 1.5 97 % 92 % 6 %

Double faults

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski Match total
Double Faults Per Match 4.5 2.08 6.58
Over 0.5 (1+) 100 % 90 % 99 %
Over 1.5 (2+) 88 % 60 % 95 %
Over 2.5 (3+) 79 % 27 % 84 %
Over 3.5 (4+) 68 % 15 % 74 %
Over 4.5 (5+) 50 % 6 % 61 %
Over 5.5 (6+) 26 % 4 % 51 %

Net points

Botic Van De Zandschulp Jan Choinski Match total
Net Points Won Per Match 7.39 7.02 14.41
Over 4.5 (5+) 74 % 88 % 81 %
Over 5.5 (6+) 74 % 76 % 75 %
Over 6.5 (7+) 67 % 76 % 72 %
Over 7.5 (8+) 63 % 56 % 60 %
Over 8.5 (9+) 56 % 48 % 52 %
Over 9.5 (10+) 48 % 40 % 44 %

Source:tennisstats.com

Odds
P1 3.75 25.5% BetBoom
P2 1.28 74.6% BetBoom

Choinski J take on Van de Zandschulp B in tennis, in US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge, on 31 August 2026. Our Glicko-2 rating model leans to Van de Zandschulp B: roughly 74% to win. The bookmaker consensus (5 books) implies about 74% for the same outcome.

Latest form: Choinski J 2 won and 3 lost; Van de Zandschulp B 3 won and 2 lost. Glicko ratings: Choinski J 1736, Van de Zandschulp B 1729, a gap of 7 points.

Our model and the market consensus broadly agree on this match. Model confidence in the favourite is high. For reliability the safer lean is a protected market on Van de Zandschulp B (double chance, say) rather than the outright win alone. Key markers: an edge of 7 Glicko rating points, the model's 74% for Van de Zandschulp B. Below on this page: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PropickAI AI breakdown. This is a probability read from our model plus the market line, not a guaranteed outcome.

🎯 PropickAI prediction
Medium confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

2 Van de Zandschulp B — 74%

1 · Choinski J26.4%
market 26%
2 · Van de Zandschulp B ✓ Pick73.6%
market 74%

Model estimate: win Choinski J 26.4%, win Van de Zandschulp B 73.6%. Model favourite — Van de Zandschulp B.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

🎯 Safe pick confident

Match winner — Van de Zandschulp B

Model confidence 75% ~79% on our history

How often this pick wins on our settled history — not a profit forecast.

How we calculated thisModel, consensus and market breakdown

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Choinski J - Van de Zandschulp B August 31, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite Fonbet: Van de Zandschulp B. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 3.75 / 2 1.27

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 5.4% 5 books
1 25.6%
2 ✓ Pick 74.5%

Odds source: consensus of 5 books (Baltbet, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

For reference

Line movement

How the odds changed from opening to the current line — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner P1 3.35 ↑ 3.75
Winner P2 1.32 ↓ 1.27

↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.

%

Market consensus

Forecast by market

Match result
Choinski J
25%
3.75
Van de Zandschulp B
75%
1.28
Total
Over 37.5
51%
1.90
Under 37.5
49%
1.92

Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.

Playoff draw

Tournament bracket 2026 US Open, New York, USA, Qualifying

Qualification round 1
Gea, Arthur2
Nagal, Sumit0
Chidekh, Clement2
Coria, Federico0
Mikrut, Luka2
Sanchez Izquierdo, Nikolas0
Kouame, Moise1
Basavareddy, Nishesh2
Wong, Coleman2
Moller, Elmer1
Neumayer, Lukas2
McCabe, James0
Squire, Henri1
Jorda Sanchis, David2
Kwon, Soonwoo0
Lajovic, Dusan0
Gaston, Hugo2
Justo, Guido Ivan0
Ilagan, Andre2
Boyer, Tristan1
Kym, Jerome2
Added, Dan0
Smith, Colton2
Pellegrino, Andrea1
Fearnley, Jacob2
Carballes Baena, Roberto0
Pavlovic, Luka2
Varillas, Juan Pablo1
Dedura-Palomero, Diego0
Ferreira Silva, Frederico2
Coppejans, Kimmer0
Rodionov, Jurij2
Droguet, Titouan1
Rincon, Daniel2
Lajal, Mark1
Lee, Jordan2
Den Ouden, Guy1
Olivieri, Genaro Alberto2
Prado Angelo, Juan Carlos1
Barrios Vera, Tomas2
Mochizuki, Shintaro2
Milavsky, Daniel0
Shick, Braden2
Tabur, Clement0
Passaro, Francesco2
Gill, Felix0
Martin Tiffon, Pol0
Gentzsch, Tom2
Samuel, Toby2
Maestrelli, Francesco1
Bueno, Gonzalo0
Harris, Billy2
Roncadelli, Franco0
Ymer, Elias2
Johnson, Spencer1
Garin, Cristian2
Svrcina, Dalibor2
Meligeni Alves, Felipe0
Smith, Keegan0
Galarneau, Alexis2
Brancaccio, Raul0
Seyboth Wild, Thiago2
Napolitano, Stefano0
McDonald, Mackenzie2
Virtanen, Otto2
Blanchet, Ugo0
Pinnington Jones, Jack2
Svajda, Trevor0
Skatov, Timofey2
Bailly, Gilles Arnaud0
Giustino, Lorenzo0
Dimitrov, Grigor2
Jacquet, Kyrian2
Midon, Lautaro0
Gomez, Federico Agustin0
Dougaz, Aziz2
Guerrieri, Andrea2
Holmgren, August1
Schwaerzler, Joel2
Heide, Gustavo1
Bu, Yunchaokete2
Noguchi, Rio1
Kolar, Zdenek0
Gojo, Borna2
Nardi, Luca0
Cina, Federico0
Echargui, Moez0
Dellien, Hugo2
Piros, Zsombor2
Alcala Gurri, Max0
Martinez, Pedro0
Glinka, Daniil2
Kasnikowski, Maks1
Budkov Kjaer, Nicolai2
Sakellaridis, Stefanos0
O'Connell, Christopher2
Mejia, Nicolas1
Draxl, Liam2
Daniel, Taro1
Johnson, Andrew2
Secord, Jack0
Schoolkate, Tristan2
Hong, Seongchan2
Basilashvili, Nikoloz0
Gaubas, Vilius2
Feldbausch, Kilian0
Cecchinato, Marco2
Broady, Liam0
Bertola, Remy2
Moro Canas, Alejandro0
Wendelken, Harry2
Travaglia, Stefano1
Rocha, Henrique2
Mmoh, Michael0
Tomic, Bernard1
Harris, Lloyd2
Onclin, Gauthier0
Sachko, Vitaliy2
Bolt, Alex0
Llamas Ruiz, Pablo2
Ofner, Sebastian1
Nishikori, Kei2
Antonius, Michael2
Searle, Henry0
Clarke, Jay1
Sakamoto, Rei2
Djere, Laslo0
Muller, Alexandre2
Qualification round 2
Gea, Arthur2
Chidekh, Clement1
Mikrut, Luka0
Basavareddy, Nishesh2
Wong, Coleman2
Neumayer, Lukas0
Jorda Sanchis, David0
Lajovic, Dusan2
Gaston, Hugo2
Ilagan, Andre0
Kym, Jerome1
Smith, Colton2
Fearnley, Jacob2
Pavlovic, Luka1
Ferreira Silva, Frederico1
Rodionov, Jurij2
Rincon, Daniel2
Lee, Jordan1
Olivieri, Genaro Alberto0
Barrios Vera, Tomas2
Mochizuki, Shintaro2
Shick, Braden0
Passaro, Francesco2
Gentzsch, Tom0
Samuel, Toby2
Harris, Billy1
Ymer, Elias0
Garin, Cristian2
Svrcina, Dalibor2
Galarneau, Alexis0
Seyboth Wild, Thiago0
McDonald, Mackenzie2
Virtanen, Otto2
Pinnington Jones, Jack1
Skatov, Timofey0
Dimitrov, Grigor2
Jacquet, Kyrian1
Dougaz, Aziz2
Guerrieri, Andrea2
Schwaerzler, Joel1
Bu, Yunchaokete2
Gojo, Borna0
Cina, Federico2
Dellien, Hugo1
Piros, Zsombor2
Glinka, Daniil1
Budkov Kjaer, Nicolai0
O'Connell, Christopher2
Draxl, Liam2
Johnson, Andrew0
Schoolkate, Tristan2
Hong, Seongchan0
Gaubas, Vilius2
Cecchinato, Marco0
Bertola, Remy1
Wendelken, Harry2
Rocha, Henrique1
Harris, Lloyd2
Sachko, Vitaliy1
Llamas Ruiz, Pablo2
Nishikori, Kei2
Antonius, Michael0
Sakamoto, Rei2
Muller, Alexandre0
Qualification Final
Gea, Arthur0
Basavareddy, Nishesh0
Wong, Coleman2
Lajovic, Dusan0
Gaston, Hugo0
Smith, Colton0
Fearnley, Jacob0
Rodionov, Jurij0
Rincon, Daniel0
Barrios Vera, Tomas2
Mochizuki, Shintaro0
Passaro, Francesco0
Samuel, Toby0
Garin, Cristian0
Svrcina, Dalibor0
McDonald, Mackenzie0
Virtanen, Otto0
Dimitrov, Grigor0
Dougaz, Aziz0
Guerrieri, Andrea2
Bu, Yunchaokete0
Cina, Federico0
Piros, Zsombor0
O'Connell, Christopher0
Draxl, Liam0
Schoolkate, Tristan0
Gaubas, Vilius0
Wendelken, Harry0
Harris, Lloyd0
Llamas Ruiz, Pablo0
Nishikori, Kei0
Sakamoto, Rei0

Playoff draw: gismo. For reference.

Unlock the full AI analysis

Get the 7-AI consensus, math-model probabilities, value picks and full reports for every match with Full Access.

Get Full Access →
Match center
Start 31.08.2026 15:00 UTC
Market 1 25.3% @ 3.75 / 2 74.7% @ 1.27
Coverage grass
Form 6 matches
🥊 Humans vs Machines
📐 Math model Van de Zandschulp B 74%
💹 Market Van de Zandschulp B 74%
Every pick locked before kickoff · public log
🏦 Virtual bank $10,000
$10,000Virtual balance

Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.

My virtual bank & leaderboard →
Match center

Choinski J - Van de Zandschulp B

V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.

Form 5/5 recent games
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Choinski J 25.6% 32.1% market and model agree
Van de Zandschulp B 74.5% 67.9% market and model agree

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko26.4% · +Elo prior (weight0.25).

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 26.4% / 73.6% probabilities
Rating 1,736 / 1,729 Choinski J / Van de Zandschulp B
RD 139 / 130 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 1,458-2,014 / 1,470-1,988 strength interval

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 1.27 Fonbet · no value · model 73.6%
1 3.75 Fonbet · no value · model 26.4%
Handicap
2 +0.5 1.27 Fonbet · line only
1 +0.5 3.45 Fonbet · line only
Total
Over 0.5 1.70 market consensus · line only
Over 10.5 3.05 market consensus · line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Open on Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Baltbet Fonbet
— 3.45 29.0%
— 3.10 32.3%
— 2.80 35.7%
— 2.45 40.8%
— 2.10 47.6%
1.84 54.4% 1.82 55.0%
— 1.55 64.5%
— 1.35 74.1%
— 1.27 78.7%
— 1.32 75.8%
— 1.40 71.4%
— 1.50 66.7%
— 1.65 60.6%
— 1.93 51.8%
— 2.30 43.5%
— 3.00 33.3%
1.94 51.6% —

Handicap

Outcome Fonbet
5.30 18.9%
9.50 10.5%
1.12 89.3%
1.03 97.1%

Total

Outcome Baltbet Fonbet
Over 33.5 — 1.50 66.7%
Over 34.5 — 1.57 63.7%
Over 35.5 — 1.65 60.6%
Over 36.5 — 1.75 57.1%
Over 37.5 1.89 52.9% 1.90 52.6%
Over 38.5 1.94 51.6% 1.95 51.3%
Over 39.5 — 2.10 47.6%
Over 40.5 — 2.25 44.4%
Over 41.5 — 2.35 42.6%
Under 33.5 — 2.40 41.7%
Under 34.5 — 2.25 44.4%
Under 35.5 — 2.10 47.6%
Under 36.5 — 1.95 51.3%
Under 37.5 1.89 52.9% 1.90 52.6%
Under 38.5 1.84 54.4% —

Total

Outcome Fonbet
Over 3.5 1.60 62.5%
Under 3.5 2.25 44.4%
Match center
Choinski J
L L L W W
2026-08-24 2026 Winston Salem, USA
Choinski J Choinski J 1:2 Rottgering M
2026-08-20 2026 Quebec City, Canada
Choinski J Choinski J 0:2 Daniel T
2026-08-13 2026 Cincinnati, USA
Choinski J Tirante T A 2:1 Choinski J
2026-08-02 2026 Bonn, Germany
Choinski J Choinski J 2:0 Mackenzie J
2026-08-01 2026 Bonn, Germany
Choinski J Choinski J 2:0 Gomez F A
2 Wins
3 Losses
1.2 Sets won
1.2 Sets lost
40% Win percentage
Van de Zandschulp B
L W W L W
2026-08-27 2026 Winston Salem, USA
Bonzi B 2:0 Van de Zandschulp B Van de Zandschulp B
2026-08-26 2026 Winston Salem, USA
Van de Zandschulp B 2:0 Darderi L Van de Zandschulp B
2026-08-25 2026 Winston Salem, USA
Van de Zandschulp B 2:0 Vallejo A D Van de Zandschulp B
2026-08-16 2026 Cincinnati, USA
Fonseca J 2:0 Van de Zandschulp B Van de Zandschulp B
2026-08-14 2026 Cincinnati, USA
Van de Zandschulp B 2:0 Shevchenko A Van de Zandschulp B
3 Wins
2 Losses
1.2 Sets won
0.8 Sets lost
60% Win percentage

More predictions

Shimabukuro S – Rinderknech A 30.08 Wong C – Paul T 30.08 Munar J – Atmane T 30.08 Faria J – Brooksby J 30.08 Landaluce M – Fearnley J 30.08 Bublik A – Wolf J J 31.08

Frequently asked questions

What does PropickAI predict for Choinski J vs Van de Zandschulp B?

The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Van de Zandschulp B. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.

What are the bookmaker odds for Choinski J vs Van de Zandschulp B?

Live odds for Choinski J vs Van de Zandschulp B from multiple bookmakers are listed on this page and refresh as the market moves.

When does Choinski J vs Van de Zandschulp B start?

August 31, 2026.