AI verdict
Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Daniel T. Full breakdown below.
Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
| Daniel T | Johnson Andrew | |
|---|---|---|
| Win % | 40% | 66.7% |
| Hard % | 28.6% | 58.3% |
| Clay % | 50% | 72.2% |
| Grass % | 0% | 0% |
| Deciding set % | 80% | 71.4% |
| Tie-breaks % | 40% | 71.4% |
| Titles (total) | 0 | 1 |
| Last 10 | LLWLLWWWLL | LWWWWLWLWW |
Source: scorego-app.com
| Daniel T | Johnson Andrew | |
|---|---|---|
| Aces per match | 3.64 | 1.25 |
| Double faults per match | 1.44 | 3.25 |
| Breaks per match | 1.04 | 2.5 |
Source:tennisstats.com (per-match averages)
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 63.2% 12 / 19 Matches | 66.7% 6 / 9 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 54.8% 17 / 31 Matches | 69.2% 9 / 13 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 4.42 | 1.00 |
| Most Aces in a match | 37 % | 0 % |
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | 70.6% 12 / 17 Matches | 68.8% 11 / 16 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | 70.6% 12 / 17 Matches | 66.7% 12 / 18 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | 2.76 | 1.33 |
| Most Aces in a match | 35 % | 67 % |
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | |
|---|---|---|
| Win Percentage 2026 Calendar Year | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 50.0% 1 / 2 Matches |
| Win Percentage Last 12 Months | N/A 0 / 0 Matches | 50.0% 1 / 2 Matches |
| Aces Per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Most Aces in a match | N/A | N/A |
Source:tennisstats.com
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | |
|---|---|---|
| H2H wins | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Sets | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
| Wins this year | 67.6% 25 / 37 Matches | 66.7% 18 / 27 Matches |
| Wins in 12 mo. | 61.2% 30 / 49 Matches | 66.7% 22 / 33 Matches |
| Current rank | 186 | 809 |
Source: tennisstats.com
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | |
|---|---|---|
| Prize money (career) | $4,892,371 USD | $0 USD |
| Rating | 186 | 809 |
| Age | 33 | — |
| Height | 1.91m | — |
| Weight | 84kg | — |
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | |
|---|---|---|
| Match Wins | 68 % | 67 % |
| Match Wins (3 Sets) | 67 % | 67 % |
| Wins in Straight Sets | 46 % | 48 % |
| Wins From Behind | 25 % | 31 % |
| Won At Least 1 Set | 76 % | 78 % |
| Set 1 Win | 62 % | 52 % |
| Set 2 Win | 59 % | 74 % |
| Set 3 Win | 73 % | 63 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Outcome percentages for totals and props: values for each player and a match-total column.
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average Games in a Set | 9.92 | 9.37 | 9.65 |
| Over 6.5 | 94 % | 100 % | 97 % |
| Over 7.5 | 92 % | 89 % | 91 % |
| Over 8.5 | 83 % | 48 % | 66 % |
| Over 9.5 | 64 % | 48 % | 56 % |
| Over 10.5 | 25 % | 19 % | 22 % |
| Over 11.5 | 25 % | 19 % | 22 % |
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aces Per Match | 3.64 | 1.25 | 4.89 |
| Most Aces in a match | 36 % | 50 % | N/A |
| 1+ | 97 % | 75 % | 88 % |
| 2+ | 83 % | 50 % | 88 % |
| 3+ | 47 % | 0 % | 86 % |
| 4+ | 36 % | 0 % | 41 % |
| 5+ | 33 % | 0 % | 38 % |
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breaks Per Match | 1.04 | 2.5 | 3.54 |
| Over 0.5 | 44 % | 25 % | 100 % |
| Over 1.5 | 3 % | 25 % | 100 % |
| Over 2.5 | 3 % | 25 % | 52 % |
| Over 3.5 | 3 % | 25 % | 52 % |
| Over 4.5 | 0 % | 25 % | 52 % |
| Over 5.5 | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % |
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tie Breaks Per Match | 0.25 | 0.37 | 0.31 |
| Over 0.5 | 25 % | 22 % | 24 % |
| Over 1.5 | 0 % | 11 % | 6 % |
| Under 0.5 | 75 % | 78 % | 24 % |
| Under 1.5 | 100 % | 89 % | 6 % |
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Double Faults Per Match | 1.44 | 3.25 | 4.69 |
| Over 0.5 (1+) | 67 % | 100 % | 99 % |
| Over 1.5 (2+) | 39 % | 75 % | 95 % |
| Over 2.5 (3+) | 22 % | 50 % | 67 % |
| Over 3.5 (4+) | 8 % | 25 % | 46 % |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 6 % | 25 % | 41 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 3 % | 25 % | 24 % |
| Taro Daniel | Andrew Johnson | Match total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net Points Won Per Match | 7.09 | 10.5 | 17.59 |
| Over 4.5 (5+) | 76 % | 100 % | 88 % |
| Over 5.5 (6+) | 59 % | 100 % | 80 % |
| Over 6.5 (7+) | 53 % | 100 % | 77 % |
| Over 7.5 (8+) | 53 % | 100 % | 77 % |
| Over 8.5 (9+) | 47 % | 75 % | 61 % |
| Over 9.5 (10+) | 47 % | 75 % | 61 % |
Source:tennisstats.com
Daniel T take on Johnson Andrew on August 25, 2026 in the US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge, International.
Recent form (W-D-L): Daniel T 4-0-1, Johnson Andrew 2-0-3. Below: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PropickAI AI breakdown.
Our model prediction (Glicko-2)
PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)
1 Daniel T — 85%
Model estimate: win Daniel T 85.1%, win Johnson Andrew 14.9%. Model favourite — Daniel T.
Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.
Match winner — Daniel T
How often this pick wins on our settled history — not a profit forecast.
Math-model prediction
The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.
For reference
Odds source: consensus of 4 books (Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.
For reference
↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.
Market consensus
Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.
Get the 7-AI consensus, math-model probabilities, value picks and full reports for every match with Full Access.
Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.
V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.
Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.
Model = Glicko + Elo strength prior (heuristic, historical calibration in progress). Glicko85.1% · +Elo prior (weight0.60).
Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.
Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.
| Outcome | Fonbet | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32 75.8% | — | |
| 1.55 64.5% | — | |
| 2.00 50.0% | 2.07 48.3% | |
| 2.75 36.4% | — | |
| — | 1.70 58.8% | |
| 3.10 32.3% | — | |
| 2.30 43.5% | — | |
| 1.77 56.5% | — | |
| 1.40 71.4% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| 1.04 96.2% | |
| 1.48 67.6% | |
| 2.55 39.2% | |
| 9.00 11.1% |
| Outcome | Fonbet | Kambi BetMGM |
|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | — | 3.30 30.3% |
| Over 8.5 | — | 1.40 71.4% |
| Over 9.5 | — | 2.08 48.1% |
| Over 10.5 | — | 3.90 25.6% |
| Over 18.5 | 1.50 66.7% | 1.50 66.7% |
| Over 19.5 | 1.78 56.2% | 1.75 57.1% |
| Over 20.5 | 2.00 50.0% | 2.02 49.5% |
| Over 21.5 | 2.25 44.4% | — |
| Over 22.5 | 2.65 37.7% | — |
| Under 10.5 | — | 1.23 81.3% |
| Under 18.5 | 2.40 41.7% | — |
| Under 19.5 | 2.05 48.8% | — |
| Under 20.5 | 1.72 58.1% | — |
| Under 21.5 | 1.57 63.7% | — |
| Under 22.5 | 1.43 69.9% | — |
| Outcome | Fonbet |
|---|---|
| Over 2.5 | 3.15 31.8% |
| Under 2.5 | 1.35 74.1% |
| Bookmaker | 1 | 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pari | 1.13 | 5.9 |
| Winline | 1.08 | 8 |
| Fonbet | 1.08 | 8 |
| Betcity | 1.04 | 9.1 |
Daniel T
Johnson Andrew
The Daniel T - Johnson Andrew breakdown — outcomes, probabilities, risks and history — is available after a free sign-in.
August 25, 2026.