PropickAI PropickAI
Sign in Sign up
English

AI verdict

AI pick Rublev A win probability ~80% confidence High best odds 1.17

Model consensus and the Glicko-2 rating lean to Rublev A. Full breakdown below.

Picks locked before kickoff results verified after public accuracy log →
Full Access Go deeper than the free pick Your free pick and probability are below. Full Access adds the full 7-AI consensus, every value-edge pick, math-model probabilities and complete reports for every match.
Get Full Access →
US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge
US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge International
31.08.2026 15:00 UTC

Virtanen O vs Rublev A — Tennis prediction

✓ Prematch ready Prematch data ✓Line ✓Form –H2H ✓Prediction
Tennis US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge
US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge grass 31.08.2026 15:00 UTC Not started
31.08.2026 15:00 UTC Not started
Virtanen O
Virtanen O
L W W L L
Rublev A
Rublev A
L W L L W
-:-
Coverage: grass
🎯 PropickAI prediction
Medium confidence

Our model prediction (Glicko-2)

PropickAI model · comparison with the market line (no margin)

2 Rublev A — 80%

1 · Virtanen O19.8%
market 19%
2 · Rublev A ✓ Pick80.2%
market 81%

Model estimate: win Virtanen O 19.8%, win Rublev A 80.2%. Model favourite — Rublev A.

Informational estimate, not a betting recommendation.

🎯 Safe pick strong

Match winner — Rublev A

Model confidence 81% ~87% on our history

How often this pick wins on our settled history — not a profit forecast.

How we calculated thisModel, consensus and market breakdown

Math-model prediction

AI match prediction Virtanen O - Rublev A August 31, 2026

Tennis math model

The summary is built from our prematch context: line, form, lineups and Glicko.

Line favourite Fonbet: Rublev A. We cross-check with Glicko and the math model below.
  • Win odds (Fonbet): 1 5.00 / 2 1.17

For reference

Fair probability (no margin)

Probability excluding the bookmaker margin — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner bookmaker margin 5.9% 6 books · best price +3.0%
1 18.8%
2 ✓ Pick 81.3%

Odds source: consensus of 6 books (Baltbet, Betcity, Fonbet, Kambi BetMGM, Kambi Unibet, Leon). This is the fair probability after removing the bookmaker margin from the odds — reference information, not a prediction or a betting recommendation.

For reference

Line movement

How the odds changed from opening to the current line — for reference, not a betting recommendation.
Winner P1 6.10 ↓ 5.00
Winner P2 1.12 ↑ 1.17

↓ odds shortened (money on this outcome), ↑ drifted (line weakened). For reference, not a betting recommendation.

%

Market consensus

Forecast by market

Match result
Virtanen O
19%
5.10
Rublev A
81%
1.20
Total
Over 36.5
49%
1.94
Under 36.5
51%
1.86

Consensus probability with the bookmaker margin removed; the number on the right is the best available odds. For reference only, not a bet.

Unlock the full AI analysis

Get the 7-AI consensus, math-model probabilities, value picks and full reports for every match with Full Access.

Get Full Access →
Preview

Extended stats (scorego)

Virtanen O Rublev A
Win % 56.8% 64%
Hard % 62% 63.5%
Clay % 38.2% 65.8%
Grass % 70.5% 62.2%
Deciding set % 49.5% 60.1%
Tie-breaks % 54.4% 49.8%
Titles (total) 8 18
Last 10 LWWLLWLWLW LWLLWWWWWL

Source: scorego-app.com

About the athletes

- Country -
- Rating -
- Age -
- Height (cm) -
- Weight (kg) -
- Hand -
- Seed -
grass Coverage grass
0 H2H 0
Odds
P1 5.10 19.1% BetBoom
P2 1.20 81.0% BetBoom

Virtanen O host Rublev A in tennis, in US Open. Men. Qualifying Wild Card Challenge, on 31 August 2026. Our Glicko-2 rating model leans to Rublev A: roughly 80% to win. Sportsbook prices (6 books) put that result at roughly 81%.

Latest form: Virtanen O 4 won and 1 lost; Rublev A 2 won and 3 lost. Virtanen O arrive on a winning run. On the Glicko scale it is 1764 for Virtanen O against 1751 for Rublev A - a gap of 12 points.

Our model and the market consensus broadly agree on this match. Model confidence in the favourite is high. That is a 1-point gap to the market. For reliability the safer lean is a protected market on Rublev A (double chance, say) rather than the outright win alone. Key markers: an edge of 12 Glicko rating points, the model's 80% for Rublev A. Below on this page: team form, head-to-head history, bookmaker odds and the full PropickAI AI breakdown. This is a probability read from our model plus the market line, not a guaranteed outcome.

Head-to-head and form stats

Head-to-head and form

Team form

Virtanen O
6-4WWLWLWLLWW
sets for 1.3sets against 0.9
Rublev A
6-4LWWWWWLLWL
sets for 1.6sets against 1.1

Head-to-head and recent form per sports statistics — for reference.

Playoff draw

Tournament bracket 2026 US Open, New York, USA, Qualifying

Qualification round 1
Gea, Arthur2
Nagal, Sumit0
Chidekh, Clement2
Coria, Federico0
Mikrut, Luka2
Sanchez Izquierdo, Nikolas0
Kouame, Moise1
Basavareddy, Nishesh2
Wong, Coleman2
Moller, Elmer1
Neumayer, Lukas2
McCabe, James0
Squire, Henri1
Jorda Sanchis, David2
Kwon, Soonwoo0
Lajovic, Dusan0
Gaston, Hugo2
Justo, Guido Ivan0
Ilagan, Andre2
Boyer, Tristan1
Kym, Jerome2
Added, Dan0
Smith, Colton2
Pellegrino, Andrea1
Fearnley, Jacob2
Carballes Baena, Roberto0
Pavlovic, Luka2
Varillas, Juan Pablo1
Dedura-Palomero, Diego0
Ferreira Silva, Frederico2
Coppejans, Kimmer0
Rodionov, Jurij2
Droguet, Titouan1
Rincon, Daniel2
Lajal, Mark1
Lee, Jordan2
Den Ouden, Guy1
Olivieri, Genaro Alberto2
Prado Angelo, Juan Carlos1
Barrios Vera, Tomas2
Mochizuki, Shintaro2
Milavsky, Daniel0
Shick, Braden2
Tabur, Clement0
Passaro, Francesco2
Gill, Felix0
Martin Tiffon, Pol0
Gentzsch, Tom2
Samuel, Toby2
Maestrelli, Francesco1
Bueno, Gonzalo0
Harris, Billy2
Roncadelli, Franco0
Ymer, Elias2
Johnson, Spencer1
Garin, Cristian2
Svrcina, Dalibor2
Meligeni Alves, Felipe0
Smith, Keegan0
Galarneau, Alexis2
Brancaccio, Raul0
Seyboth Wild, Thiago2
Napolitano, Stefano0
McDonald, Mackenzie2
Virtanen, Otto2
Blanchet, Ugo0
Pinnington Jones, Jack2
Svajda, Trevor0
Skatov, Timofey2
Bailly, Gilles Arnaud0
Giustino, Lorenzo0
Dimitrov, Grigor2
Jacquet, Kyrian2
Midon, Lautaro0
Gomez, Federico Agustin0
Dougaz, Aziz2
Guerrieri, Andrea2
Holmgren, August1
Schwaerzler, Joel2
Heide, Gustavo1
Bu, Yunchaokete2
Noguchi, Rio1
Kolar, Zdenek0
Gojo, Borna2
Nardi, Luca0
Cina, Federico0
Echargui, Moez0
Dellien, Hugo2
Piros, Zsombor2
Alcala Gurri, Max0
Martinez, Pedro0
Glinka, Daniil2
Kasnikowski, Maks1
Budkov Kjaer, Nicolai2
Sakellaridis, Stefanos0
O'Connell, Christopher2
Mejia, Nicolas1
Draxl, Liam2
Daniel, Taro1
Johnson, Andrew2
Secord, Jack0
Schoolkate, Tristan2
Hong, Seongchan2
Basilashvili, Nikoloz0
Gaubas, Vilius2
Feldbausch, Kilian0
Cecchinato, Marco2
Broady, Liam0
Bertola, Remy2
Moro Canas, Alejandro0
Wendelken, Harry2
Travaglia, Stefano1
Rocha, Henrique2
Mmoh, Michael0
Tomic, Bernard1
Harris, Lloyd2
Onclin, Gauthier0
Sachko, Vitaliy2
Bolt, Alex0
Llamas Ruiz, Pablo2
Ofner, Sebastian1
Nishikori, Kei2
Antonius, Michael2
Searle, Henry0
Clarke, Jay1
Sakamoto, Rei2
Djere, Laslo0
Muller, Alexandre2
Qualification round 2
Gea, Arthur2
Chidekh, Clement1
Mikrut, Luka0
Basavareddy, Nishesh2
Wong, Coleman2
Neumayer, Lukas0
Jorda Sanchis, David0
Lajovic, Dusan2
Gaston, Hugo2
Ilagan, Andre0
Kym, Jerome1
Smith, Colton2
Fearnley, Jacob2
Pavlovic, Luka1
Ferreira Silva, Frederico1
Rodionov, Jurij2
Rincon, Daniel2
Lee, Jordan1
Olivieri, Genaro Alberto0
Barrios Vera, Tomas2
Mochizuki, Shintaro2
Shick, Braden0
Passaro, Francesco2
Gentzsch, Tom0
Samuel, Toby2
Harris, Billy1
Ymer, Elias0
Garin, Cristian2
Svrcina, Dalibor2
Galarneau, Alexis0
Seyboth Wild, Thiago0
McDonald, Mackenzie2
Virtanen, Otto2
Pinnington Jones, Jack1
Skatov, Timofey0
Dimitrov, Grigor2
Jacquet, Kyrian1
Dougaz, Aziz2
Guerrieri, Andrea2
Schwaerzler, Joel1
Bu, Yunchaokete2
Gojo, Borna0
Cina, Federico2
Dellien, Hugo1
Piros, Zsombor2
Glinka, Daniil1
Budkov Kjaer, Nicolai0
O'Connell, Christopher2
Draxl, Liam2
Johnson, Andrew0
Schoolkate, Tristan2
Hong, Seongchan0
Gaubas, Vilius2
Cecchinato, Marco0
Bertola, Remy1
Wendelken, Harry2
Rocha, Henrique1
Harris, Lloyd2
Sachko, Vitaliy1
Llamas Ruiz, Pablo2
Nishikori, Kei2
Antonius, Michael0
Sakamoto, Rei2
Muller, Alexandre0
Qualification Final
Gea, Arthur0
Basavareddy, Nishesh2
Wong, Coleman2
Lajovic, Dusan0
Gaston, Hugo2
Smith, Colton1
Fearnley, Jacob1
Rodionov, Jurij2
Rincon, Daniel0
Barrios Vera, Tomas2
Mochizuki, Shintaro0
Passaro, Francesco2
Samuel, Toby0
Garin, Cristian0
Svrcina, Dalibor2
McDonald, Mackenzie1
Virtanen, Otto0
Dimitrov, Grigor0
Dougaz, Aziz0
Guerrieri, Andrea2
Bu, Yunchaokete1
Cina, Federico2
Piros, Zsombor0
O'Connell, Christopher0
Draxl, Liam1
Schoolkate, Tristan2
Gaubas, Vilius1
Wendelken, Harry2
Harris, Lloyd2
Llamas Ruiz, Pablo0
Nishikori, Kei0
Sakamoto, Rei2

Playoff draw: gismo. For reference.

Match center
Start 31.08.2026 15:00 UTC
Market 1 19.0% @ 5.00 / 2 81.0% @ 1.17
Coverage grass
Form 6 matches
🥊 Humans vs Machines
📐 Math model Rublev A 80%
💹 Market Rublev A 81%
Every pick locked before kickoff · public log
🏦 Virtual bank $10,000
$10,000Virtual balance

Play free: you start with $10,000 in virtual money. Bet on this match at our odds, then track your profit and climb the global leaderboard. No real money, no sign-up.

My virtual bank & leaderboard →
Match center

Virtanen O - Rublev A

V baze uchteny nedavnie matchi oboikh uchastnikov.

Form 5/5 recent games
Market 2 model / bookmakers
Market and Glicko

Tennis math model. Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Outcome Line Glicko Signal
Virtanen O 18.8% 19.8%
Rublev A 81.3% 80.2% market and model agree

Glicko-2 is a team-strength rating: it weighs the line, history and consistency, but is not a guarantee.

Tennis math model
P1 / P2 19.8% / 80.2% probabilities
Rating 1,764 / 1,751 Virtanen O / Rublev A
RD 90 / 153 rating uncertainty
r +/- 2RD 1,583-1,944 / 1,446-2,057 strength interval

Tennis without draws: the base signal comes from player rating, surface, form, serve/return and tournament fatigue. For live logic the set state and who is serving matter more than the overall points score.

Betting snapshot
1X2
2 1.17 Fonbet · no value · model 80.2%
1 5.00 Fonbet · no value · model 19.8%
Total
Over 34.5 1.89 market consensus · line only
Over 35.5 1.86 market consensus · line only

Betting notes are built from the line, market and our math model: take a signal only when the model and market agree.

Bookmaker line

Match markets

Open on Fonbet →
bookmaker line and markets

Handicap

Outcome Betcity Leon
— 2.05 48.8%
1.73 57.8% 1.72 58.1%
— 1.75 57.1%
2.10 47.6% 2.08 48.1%

Total

Outcome Betcity Leon
Over 34.5 — 1.89 52.9%
Over 35.5 — 1.86 53.8%
Over 36.5 1.94 51.6% 1.92 52.1%
Under 34.5 — 1.89 52.9%
Under 35.5 — 1.91 52.4%
Under 36.5 1.86 53.8% 1.86 53.8%

Outcome (1X2)

Outcome Baltbet Betcity Fonbet Kambi BetMGM Kambi Unibet Leon
5.10 19.6% 4.50 22.2% 5.00 20.0% 5.00 20.0% 5.00 20.0% 5.00 20.0%
1.17 85.5% 1.20 83.3% 1.17 85.5% 1.14 87.7% 1.14 87.7% 1.16 86.2%
Match center
Virtanen O
D W W L L
2026-08-27 2026 US Open, New York, USA, Qualifying
Virtanen O Virtanen O 0:0 Dimitrov G
2026-08-26 2026 US Open, New York, USA, Qualifying
Virtanen O Virtanen O 2:1 Pinnington Jones J
2026-08-24 2026 US Open, New York, USA, Qualifying
Virtanen O Virtanen O 2:0 Blanchet U
2026-08-19 2026 Cancun, Mexico
Virtanen O Virtanen O 0:2 Echargui M
2026-08-13 2026 Cincinnati, USA, Qualifying
Virtanen O Wong C 2:0 Virtanen O
2 Wins
2 Losses
0.8 Sets won
1.0 Sets lost
40% Win percentage
Rublev A
L W L L W
2026-08-18 2026 Cincinnati, USA
Rublev A 0:2 Borges N Rublev A
2026-08-16 2026 Cincinnati, USA
Rublev A 2:0 Carreno Busta P Rublev A
2026-08-04 2026 Montreal, Canada
Shang Juncheng 2:1 Rublev A Rublev A
2026-07-24 2026 Estoril, Portugal
Rublev A 1:2 Van Assche L Rublev A
2026-07-23 2026 Estoril, Portugal
Rublev A 2:0 Skatov T Rublev A
2 Wins
3 Losses
1.2 Sets won
1.2 Sets lost
40% Win percentage

More predictions

Arnaldi M – Duckworth J 31.08 Safiullin R. (Mir) – Alkaras K. (Isp) 31.08 Rodionov J – Mpetshi Perricard G 31.08 Nakashima B – Baez S 31.08 Darderi L – Wendelken H 31.08 Svrcina D – Royer V 31.08

Frequently asked questions

What does PropickAI predict for Virtanen O vs Rublev A?

The consensus of 7 AI models and the Glicko-2 rating leans to Rublev A. Full probabilities and bookmaker odds are shown on this page.

What are the bookmaker odds for Virtanen O vs Rublev A?

Live odds for Virtanen O vs Rublev A from multiple bookmakers are listed on this page and refresh as the market moves.

When does Virtanen O vs Rublev A start?

August 31, 2026.